扩展有限元方法预测和跟踪腹主动脉瘤破裂传播

Wisam J K Al-obaidi, Mohammed, Al-Tayyar, P. Mandal
{"title":"扩展有限元方法预测和跟踪腹主动脉瘤破裂传播","authors":"Wisam J K Al-obaidi, Mohammed, Al-Tayyar, P. Mandal","doi":"10.30772/qjes.2023.178994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening cardio-vascular condition. Current surgical intervention is based on the maximum diameter threshold of 5.5 cm. Over the past years, two indicators to predict potential rupture, Rupture Potential Index (RPI) and Finite Element Analysis Rupture Index (FEARI), had been developed using finite element analysis (FEA), based on the predicted maximum wall stress and statistical or local wall strength. The purpose of this study is to develop a numerical model using the extended finite element method (XFEM) to understand the initiation/growth of potential rupture and predict its location in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall by involving the parameters of failure: the wall stress, wall strength, and strain, as well as, investigating the use of 3D-US AAA models instead of CT models. Failure analyses were conducted on numerical models of AAA derived from 3D-US and CT images for four elected patients to examine the initiation and growth of potential rupture under three different pressures of 120, 140, and 160 mmHg and three different wall strengths of 0.33, 1.34, and 2.36 MPa respectively. The majority of AAAs showed insignificant differences in stress distributions between 3D-US and CT models, except for one patient where the 3D-US model remarkably showed higher stress compared to the CT model. The location of rupture initiation was predicted reliably for both the models of AAA which have been independently verified with visual predictions by cardio-vascular surgeons. However, the predicted length of rupture and the potential penetration (full damage of the wall) varied between the models depending upon the applied pressure and the strength of the wall.","PeriodicalId":227530,"journal":{"name":"Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Extended finite element approach to predict and track rupture propagation in abdominal aortic aneurysm\",\"authors\":\"Wisam J K Al-obaidi, Mohammed, Al-Tayyar, P. Mandal\",\"doi\":\"10.30772/qjes.2023.178994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening cardio-vascular condition. Current surgical intervention is based on the maximum diameter threshold of 5.5 cm. Over the past years, two indicators to predict potential rupture, Rupture Potential Index (RPI) and Finite Element Analysis Rupture Index (FEARI), had been developed using finite element analysis (FEA), based on the predicted maximum wall stress and statistical or local wall strength. The purpose of this study is to develop a numerical model using the extended finite element method (XFEM) to understand the initiation/growth of potential rupture and predict its location in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall by involving the parameters of failure: the wall stress, wall strength, and strain, as well as, investigating the use of 3D-US AAA models instead of CT models. Failure analyses were conducted on numerical models of AAA derived from 3D-US and CT images for four elected patients to examine the initiation and growth of potential rupture under three different pressures of 120, 140, and 160 mmHg and three different wall strengths of 0.33, 1.34, and 2.36 MPa respectively. The majority of AAAs showed insignificant differences in stress distributions between 3D-US and CT models, except for one patient where the 3D-US model remarkably showed higher stress compared to the CT model. The location of rupture initiation was predicted reliably for both the models of AAA which have been independently verified with visual predictions by cardio-vascular surgeons. However, the predicted length of rupture and the potential penetration (full damage of the wall) varied between the models depending upon the applied pressure and the strength of the wall.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.2023.178994\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Qadisiyah Journal for Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30772/qjes.2023.178994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

腹主动脉瘤(AAA)是一种危及生命的心血管疾病。目前的手术干预是基于5.5 cm的最大直径阈值。在过去的几年里,基于预测的最大壁面应力和统计或局部壁面强度,利用有限元分析(FEA)开发了两个预测潜在破裂的指标——破裂电位指数(RPI)和有限元分析破裂指数(FEARI)。本研究的目的是利用扩展有限元法(XFEM)建立一个数值模型,通过涉及破裂参数:壁应力、壁强度和应变,了解腹主动脉瘤壁潜在破裂的发生/发展,预测其在腹主动脉瘤壁的位置,并研究使用3D-US AAA模型代替CT模型。通过3D-US和CT图像建立的AAA数值模型,对4例入选患者进行失效分析,研究在120、140和160 mmHg三种不同压力和0.33、1.34和2.36 MPa三种不同壁强下AAA潜在破裂的发生和发展情况。大多数AAAs在3D-US和CT模型之间的应力分布差异不显著,但有1例患者3D-US模型的应力明显高于CT模型。两种AAA模型的破裂起始位置预测都是可靠的,并且已经由心血管外科医生独立地通过视觉预测进行了验证。然而,预测的破裂长度和潜在的穿透(墙的完全破坏)在不同的模型之间有所不同,这取决于施加的压力和墙的强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Extended finite element approach to predict and track rupture propagation in abdominal aortic aneurysm
Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a life-threatening cardio-vascular condition. Current surgical intervention is based on the maximum diameter threshold of 5.5 cm. Over the past years, two indicators to predict potential rupture, Rupture Potential Index (RPI) and Finite Element Analysis Rupture Index (FEARI), had been developed using finite element analysis (FEA), based on the predicted maximum wall stress and statistical or local wall strength. The purpose of this study is to develop a numerical model using the extended finite element method (XFEM) to understand the initiation/growth of potential rupture and predict its location in abdominal aortic aneurysm wall by involving the parameters of failure: the wall stress, wall strength, and strain, as well as, investigating the use of 3D-US AAA models instead of CT models. Failure analyses were conducted on numerical models of AAA derived from 3D-US and CT images for four elected patients to examine the initiation and growth of potential rupture under three different pressures of 120, 140, and 160 mmHg and three different wall strengths of 0.33, 1.34, and 2.36 MPa respectively. The majority of AAAs showed insignificant differences in stress distributions between 3D-US and CT models, except for one patient where the 3D-US model remarkably showed higher stress compared to the CT model. The location of rupture initiation was predicted reliably for both the models of AAA which have been independently verified with visual predictions by cardio-vascular surgeons. However, the predicted length of rupture and the potential penetration (full damage of the wall) varied between the models depending upon the applied pressure and the strength of the wall.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信