为突破性产品创新开发并行程序

J. Bessant, D. Francis
{"title":"为突破性产品创新开发并行程序","authors":"J. Bessant, D. Francis","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1306952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A paradox in innovation management is that firms deploying what is generally recognised 'good practice' can find themselves under threat through disruption caused by some form of discontinuity in their operating environment. Routines suited to dealing with 'steady state' innovation differ from and may even conflict with those needed to explore and exploit discontinuous shifts in technology or markets. This paper explores this 'innovator's dilemma' and reviews the experience of a case study firm working in the medical products field. It argues that firms need to learn to manage innovation but that two complementary learning approaches - adaptive and generative - are needed.","PeriodicalId":280189,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing Parallel Routines for Radical Product Innovation\",\"authors\":\"J. Bessant, D. Francis\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1306952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A paradox in innovation management is that firms deploying what is generally recognised 'good practice' can find themselves under threat through disruption caused by some form of discontinuity in their operating environment. Routines suited to dealing with 'steady state' innovation differ from and may even conflict with those needed to explore and exploit discontinuous shifts in technology or markets. This paper explores this 'innovator's dilemma' and reviews the experience of a case study firm working in the medical products field. It argues that firms need to learn to manage innovation but that two complementary learning approaches - adaptive and generative - are needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Institute of Management Research (AIM) Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

创新管理中的一个矛盾之处在于,企业采用了通常公认的“良好实践”,却发现自己受到了运营环境中某种形式的不连续性所造成的破坏的威胁。适合处理“稳定状态”创新的常规与探索和利用技术或市场的不连续变化所需的常规不同,甚至可能相冲突。本文探讨了这种“创新者的困境”,并回顾了一个案例研究公司在医疗产品领域工作的经验。它认为,企业需要学会管理创新,但需要两种互补的学习方法——适应性和生成性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing Parallel Routines for Radical Product Innovation
A paradox in innovation management is that firms deploying what is generally recognised 'good practice' can find themselves under threat through disruption caused by some form of discontinuity in their operating environment. Routines suited to dealing with 'steady state' innovation differ from and may even conflict with those needed to explore and exploit discontinuous shifts in technology or markets. This paper explores this 'innovator's dilemma' and reviews the experience of a case study firm working in the medical products field. It argues that firms need to learn to manage innovation but that two complementary learning approaches - adaptive and generative - are needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信