加速受石油污染海岸线恢复的应对方案综述

E. Owens, E. Taylor, G. Sergy, C. An, Z. Chen, Kenneth Lee, Edmonton Ab T J G Canada S Environmental, Ottawa On K A E Canada Oceans Canada
{"title":"加速受石油污染海岸线恢复的应对方案综述","authors":"E. Owens, E. Taylor, G. Sergy, C. An, Z. Chen, Kenneth Lee, Edmonton Ab T J G Canada S Environmental, Ottawa On K A E Canada Oceans Canada","doi":"10.3808/JEIL.202100049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rate at which oil on shorelines weathers and attenuates is a function of the character of the oil on the shoreline (type and volume), the character of the shoreline materials, and the environmental setting (physical and biological). Some light crude oils or products have a very short half-life and may persist for only hours or days whereas other oils may persist for months to years. The objective of this review is to summarize how and why the different commonly used and available response options can contribute to accelerating shoreline recovery and to explain the potential consequences of these actions. Globally, the most widely used shoreline treatment activity is simple physical removal by manual or mechanical cleanup methods with off-site disposal. The explanation for this situation lies in the fact that this method is typically quick, easy, and requires no special skill sets or dedicated equipment. The second most widely used treatment method is low-pressure flushing or washing. A concern with this option is that typically little or no oil is recovered, unless the oil loading on the shore is very high and, although some of the oil may be broken down and dispersed in the water column and then biodegraded, if the method generates oil residue-sediment aggregates these may be negatively buoyant when the sediments are granular (> 1 mm) or coarser. Many guides and manuals describe the mechanics and implementation of these and other treatment methods; this review evaluates the state-of-the art with respect to currently available and widely applicable treatment options to accelerate oiled shore- line recovery. This knowledge is intended to support the creation of a science-based Shoreline Response Program (SRP) Decision Support Tool that is under development as part the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Multi-Partner Research Initiative (MPRI) program. The primary benefit of this tool is to enhance the quality of strategic planning regarding shoreline response intervention and non-intervention decisions related, in part, to Alternative Response Technologies for shoreline treatment.","PeriodicalId":143718,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Review of Response Options to Accelerate the Recovery of Oiled Shorelines\",\"authors\":\"E. Owens, E. Taylor, G. Sergy, C. An, Z. Chen, Kenneth Lee, Edmonton Ab T J G Canada S Environmental, Ottawa On K A E Canada Oceans Canada\",\"doi\":\"10.3808/JEIL.202100049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The rate at which oil on shorelines weathers and attenuates is a function of the character of the oil on the shoreline (type and volume), the character of the shoreline materials, and the environmental setting (physical and biological). Some light crude oils or products have a very short half-life and may persist for only hours or days whereas other oils may persist for months to years. The objective of this review is to summarize how and why the different commonly used and available response options can contribute to accelerating shoreline recovery and to explain the potential consequences of these actions. Globally, the most widely used shoreline treatment activity is simple physical removal by manual or mechanical cleanup methods with off-site disposal. The explanation for this situation lies in the fact that this method is typically quick, easy, and requires no special skill sets or dedicated equipment. The second most widely used treatment method is low-pressure flushing or washing. A concern with this option is that typically little or no oil is recovered, unless the oil loading on the shore is very high and, although some of the oil may be broken down and dispersed in the water column and then biodegraded, if the method generates oil residue-sediment aggregates these may be negatively buoyant when the sediments are granular (> 1 mm) or coarser. Many guides and manuals describe the mechanics and implementation of these and other treatment methods; this review evaluates the state-of-the art with respect to currently available and widely applicable treatment options to accelerate oiled shore- line recovery. This knowledge is intended to support the creation of a science-based Shoreline Response Program (SRP) Decision Support Tool that is under development as part the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Multi-Partner Research Initiative (MPRI) program. The primary benefit of this tool is to enhance the quality of strategic planning regarding shoreline response intervention and non-intervention decisions related, in part, to Alternative Response Technologies for shoreline treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143718,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3808/JEIL.202100049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Informatics Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3808/JEIL.202100049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

海岸线上石油的风化和衰减速率是海岸线上石油的特性(类型和体积)、海岸线材料的特性和环境设置(物理和生物)的函数。一些轻质原油或产品的半衰期很短,可能只持续几小时或几天,而其他油可能持续数月至数年。本综述的目的是总结不同的常用和可用的应对方案如何以及为什么有助于加速海岸线恢复,并解释这些行动的潜在后果。在全球范围内,最广泛使用的岸线处理活动是通过人工或机械清理方法进行简单的物理清除,并进行场外处置。对这种情况的解释是,这种方法通常是快速,简单的,不需要特殊的技能或专用设备。第二种最常用的处理方法是低压冲洗或冲洗。这种选择的一个问题是,除非岸上的石油负荷非常高,否则通常很少或根本不回收石油,尽管一些石油可能会被分解并分散在水柱中,然后被生物降解,但如果该方法产生石油残渣沉积物聚集体,当沉积物颗粒状(> 1毫米)或更粗时,这些沉积物可能具有负浮力。许多指南和手册描述了这些和其他治疗方法的机制和实施;这篇综述评估了目前可用的和广泛适用的处理方案,以加速受油海岸的恢复。这些知识旨在支持基于科学的海岸线响应计划(SRP)决策支持工具的创建,该工具作为加拿大渔业和海洋多方合作研究倡议(MPRI)计划的一部分正在开发中。该工具的主要好处是提高了海岸线响应干预和非干预决策的战略规划质量,这些决策部分与海岸线处理的替代响应技术有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Review of Response Options to Accelerate the Recovery of Oiled Shorelines
The rate at which oil on shorelines weathers and attenuates is a function of the character of the oil on the shoreline (type and volume), the character of the shoreline materials, and the environmental setting (physical and biological). Some light crude oils or products have a very short half-life and may persist for only hours or days whereas other oils may persist for months to years. The objective of this review is to summarize how and why the different commonly used and available response options can contribute to accelerating shoreline recovery and to explain the potential consequences of these actions. Globally, the most widely used shoreline treatment activity is simple physical removal by manual or mechanical cleanup methods with off-site disposal. The explanation for this situation lies in the fact that this method is typically quick, easy, and requires no special skill sets or dedicated equipment. The second most widely used treatment method is low-pressure flushing or washing. A concern with this option is that typically little or no oil is recovered, unless the oil loading on the shore is very high and, although some of the oil may be broken down and dispersed in the water column and then biodegraded, if the method generates oil residue-sediment aggregates these may be negatively buoyant when the sediments are granular (> 1 mm) or coarser. Many guides and manuals describe the mechanics and implementation of these and other treatment methods; this review evaluates the state-of-the art with respect to currently available and widely applicable treatment options to accelerate oiled shore- line recovery. This knowledge is intended to support the creation of a science-based Shoreline Response Program (SRP) Decision Support Tool that is under development as part the Fisheries and Oceans Canada Multi-Partner Research Initiative (MPRI) program. The primary benefit of this tool is to enhance the quality of strategic planning regarding shoreline response intervention and non-intervention decisions related, in part, to Alternative Response Technologies for shoreline treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信