心理治疗不是一件事:同时模拟不同的治疗方法

Maitrey Mehta, Derek D. Caperton, Katherine Axford, L. Weitzman, David C. Atkins, Vivek Srikumar, Zac E. Imel
{"title":"心理治疗不是一件事:同时模拟不同的治疗方法","authors":"Maitrey Mehta, Derek D. Caperton, Katherine Axford, L. Weitzman, David C. Atkins, Vivek Srikumar, Zac E. Imel","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.clpsych-1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are many different forms of psychotherapy. Itemized inventories of psychotherapeutic interventions provide a mechanism for evaluating the quality of care received by clients and for conducting research on how psychotherapy helps. However, evaluations such as these are slow, expensive, and are rarely used outside of well-funded research studies. Natural language processing research has progressed to allow automating such tasks. Yet, NLP work in this area has been restricted to evaluating a single approach to treatment, when prior research indicates therapists used a wide variety of interventions with their clients, often in the same session. In this paper, we frame this scenario as a multi-label classification task, and develop a group of models aimed at predicting a wide variety of therapist talk-turn level orientations. Our models achieve F1 macro scores of 0.5, with the class F1 ranging from 0.36 to 0.67. We present analyses which offer insights into the capability of such models to capture psychotherapy approaches, and which may complement human judgment.","PeriodicalId":107109,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychotherapy is Not One Thing: Simultaneous Modeling of Different Therapeutic Approaches\",\"authors\":\"Maitrey Mehta, Derek D. Caperton, Katherine Axford, L. Weitzman, David C. Atkins, Vivek Srikumar, Zac E. Imel\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2022.clpsych-1.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There are many different forms of psychotherapy. Itemized inventories of psychotherapeutic interventions provide a mechanism for evaluating the quality of care received by clients and for conducting research on how psychotherapy helps. However, evaluations such as these are slow, expensive, and are rarely used outside of well-funded research studies. Natural language processing research has progressed to allow automating such tasks. Yet, NLP work in this area has been restricted to evaluating a single approach to treatment, when prior research indicates therapists used a wide variety of interventions with their clients, often in the same session. In this paper, we frame this scenario as a multi-label classification task, and develop a group of models aimed at predicting a wide variety of therapist talk-turn level orientations. Our models achieve F1 macro scores of 0.5, with the class F1 ranging from 0.36 to 0.67. We present analyses which offer insights into the capability of such models to capture psychotherapy approaches, and which may complement human judgment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":107109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.clpsych-1.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Eighth Workshop on Computational Linguistics and Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.clpsych-1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

心理治疗有很多不同的形式。心理治疗干预的分项清单提供了一种机制,用于评估客户接受的护理质量,并进行心理治疗如何帮助的研究。然而,诸如此类的评估是缓慢的,昂贵的,并且很少在资金充足的研究之外使用。自然语言处理研究已经取得进展,使这些任务能够自动化。然而,这一领域的NLP工作一直局限于评估单一的治疗方法,而之前的研究表明,治疗师对他们的客户使用了各种各样的干预措施,通常是在同一次治疗中。在本文中,我们将这种情况构建为一个多标签分类任务,并开发了一组旨在预测各种治疗师谈话转向水平取向的模型。我们的模型F1宏观得分为0.5,F1类的范围为0.36到0.67。我们提出的分析提供了对这种模型捕捉心理治疗方法的能力的见解,并且可以补充人类的判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychotherapy is Not One Thing: Simultaneous Modeling of Different Therapeutic Approaches
There are many different forms of psychotherapy. Itemized inventories of psychotherapeutic interventions provide a mechanism for evaluating the quality of care received by clients and for conducting research on how psychotherapy helps. However, evaluations such as these are slow, expensive, and are rarely used outside of well-funded research studies. Natural language processing research has progressed to allow automating such tasks. Yet, NLP work in this area has been restricted to evaluating a single approach to treatment, when prior research indicates therapists used a wide variety of interventions with their clients, often in the same session. In this paper, we frame this scenario as a multi-label classification task, and develop a group of models aimed at predicting a wide variety of therapist talk-turn level orientations. Our models achieve F1 macro scores of 0.5, with the class F1 ranging from 0.36 to 0.67. We present analyses which offer insights into the capability of such models to capture psychotherapy approaches, and which may complement human judgment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信