静态图像的误差复原算法编码

Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing Pub Date : 1996-09-16 DOI:10.1109/ICIP.1996.560614

D. Redmill, D. Bull

{"title":"静态图像的误差复原算法编码","authors":"D. Redmill, D. Bull","doi":"10.1109/ICIP.1996.560614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the use of arithmetic coding in conjunction with the error resilient entropy code (EREC). The constraints on the coding model are discussed and simulation results are presented and compared to those obtained using Huffman coding. These results show that without the EREC, arithmetic coding is less resilient than Huffman coding, while with the EREC both systems yield comparable results.","PeriodicalId":192947,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Error resilient arithmetic coding of still images\",\"authors\":\"D. Redmill, D. Bull\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIP.1996.560614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the use of arithmetic coding in conjunction with the error resilient entropy code (EREC). The constraints on the coding model are discussed and simulation results are presented and compared to those obtained using Huffman coding. These results show that without the EREC, arithmetic coding is less resilient than Huffman coding, while with the EREC both systems yield comparable results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"21\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.1996.560614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.1996.560614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

摘要

本文研究了算术编码与误差弹性熵码(EREC)的结合使用。讨论了编码模型的约束条件，给出了仿真结果，并与使用霍夫曼编码的结果进行了比较。这些结果表明，在没有EREC的情况下，算术编码的弹性不如霍夫曼编码，而在使用EREC的情况下，两种系统产生的结果相当。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Error resilient arithmetic coding of still images

This paper examines the use of arithmetic coding in conjunction with the error resilient entropy code (EREC). The constraints on the coding model are discussed and simulation results are presented and compared to those obtained using Huffman coding. These results show that without the EREC, arithmetic coding is less resilient than Huffman coding, while with the EREC both systems yield comparable results.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of 3rd IEEE International Conference on Image Processing

自引率

0.00%

发文量