政策论坛:税收支出-从安大略省学费和教育税收抵免取消的教训

Christine Neill, Tracy R. Snoddon
{"title":"政策论坛:税收支出-从安大略省学费和教育税收抵免取消的教训","authors":"Christine Neill, Tracy R. Snoddon","doi":"10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.pf.neill.snoddon","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stanley Surrey and others have highlighted tax expenditures as being hidden forms of spending that can evade the type of analysis and scrutiny applied to direct spending programs, allowing inefficient and inequitable programs to persist. But there is only limited empirical evidence on differences in the persistence of similar programs in a tax measure compared to a direct spending form. The conversion of Ontario's education and tuition tax expenditures into a direct form of spending via the existing student aid program provides an interesting case study. As discussed in this article, although the tax credits had never been the subject of a value-for-money audit, the student aid program was reviewed in 2018 shortly after the changeover, to hearty criticism of its distributional effects despite its being less regressive than the tax credit versions. This led to substantial cuts in the program, in line with views on the persistence of tax expenditures.","PeriodicalId":375948,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Policy Forum: Tax Expenditures—Lessons from the Elimination of Ontario's Tuition and Education Tax Credits\",\"authors\":\"Christine Neill, Tracy R. Snoddon\",\"doi\":\"10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.pf.neill.snoddon\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Stanley Surrey and others have highlighted tax expenditures as being hidden forms of spending that can evade the type of analysis and scrutiny applied to direct spending programs, allowing inefficient and inequitable programs to persist. But there is only limited empirical evidence on differences in the persistence of similar programs in a tax measure compared to a direct spending form. The conversion of Ontario's education and tuition tax expenditures into a direct form of spending via the existing student aid program provides an interesting case study. As discussed in this article, although the tax credits had never been the subject of a value-for-money audit, the student aid program was reviewed in 2018 shortly after the changeover, to hearty criticism of its distributional effects despite its being less regressive than the tax credit versions. This led to substantial cuts in the program, in line with views on the persistence of tax expenditures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":375948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.pf.neill.snoddon\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Tax Journal/Revue fiscale canadienne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32721/ctj.2022.70.3.pf.neill.snoddon","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

斯坦利·萨里(Stanley Surrey)和其他人强调,税收支出是一种隐藏的支出形式,可以逃避适用于直接支出项目的分析和审查,从而导致效率低下和不公平的项目持续存在。但是,只有有限的经验证据表明,与直接支出形式相比,税收措施中类似项目的持久性存在差异。通过现有的学生援助计划,将安大略省的教育和学费税收支出直接转化为支出形式,提供了一个有趣的案例研究。正如本文所讨论的那样,尽管税收抵免从未成为物有所值审计的主题,但在转换后不久,2018年对学生援助计划进行了审查,尽管它的累退性不如税收抵免版本,但对其分配效果的强烈批评。这导致了该计划的大幅削减,符合对税收支出持续存在的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Policy Forum: Tax Expenditures—Lessons from the Elimination of Ontario's Tuition and Education Tax Credits
Stanley Surrey and others have highlighted tax expenditures as being hidden forms of spending that can evade the type of analysis and scrutiny applied to direct spending programs, allowing inefficient and inequitable programs to persist. But there is only limited empirical evidence on differences in the persistence of similar programs in a tax measure compared to a direct spending form. The conversion of Ontario's education and tuition tax expenditures into a direct form of spending via the existing student aid program provides an interesting case study. As discussed in this article, although the tax credits had never been the subject of a value-for-money audit, the student aid program was reviewed in 2018 shortly after the changeover, to hearty criticism of its distributional effects despite its being less regressive than the tax credit versions. This led to substantial cuts in the program, in line with views on the persistence of tax expenditures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信