Luis Rizo Domínguez, R. Mahapatra, I. Padilla-Cantoya
{"title":"利用FPGA实现评估互联网重传超时预测器","authors":"Luis Rizo Domínguez, R. Mahapatra, I. Padilla-Cantoya","doi":"10.1145/3123779.3123798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The congestion control avoidance of TCP (Transport Control Protocol), the most used protocol in Internet, is based on critical RTT (Round Trip Time) forecasting process. Currently, several delay predictors are proposed in literature; but practical implementations have not been yet evaluated. In this paper, a comparison of on-line predictors is presented. We used Altera Cyclone IV GX FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) for evaluation; the criteria included performance time, power, and number of logic elements. For comparison purposes, we considered the most used predictor as reference and concluded which one is more suitable for implementation in next generation devices.","PeriodicalId":405980,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using FPGA implementations for evaluation of internet retransmission-time-out predictors\",\"authors\":\"Luis Rizo Domínguez, R. Mahapatra, I. Padilla-Cantoya\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3123779.3123798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The congestion control avoidance of TCP (Transport Control Protocol), the most used protocol in Internet, is based on critical RTT (Round Trip Time) forecasting process. Currently, several delay predictors are proposed in literature; but practical implementations have not been yet evaluated. In this paper, a comparison of on-line predictors is presented. We used Altera Cyclone IV GX FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) for evaluation; the criteria included performance time, power, and number of logic elements. For comparison purposes, we considered the most used predictor as reference and concluded which one is more suitable for implementation in next generation devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":405980,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3123779.3123798\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3123779.3123798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
TCP (Transport control Protocol,传输控制协议)是Internet上最常用的协议,它的拥塞控制规避是基于临界往返时间(RTT)预测过程的。目前,文献中提出了几种延迟预测器;但实际应用尚未得到评估。本文对在线预测器进行了比较。我们使用Altera Cyclone IV GX FPGA(现场可编程门阵列)进行评估;这些标准包括性能、时间、功率和逻辑元件的数量。为了比较,我们考虑了最常用的预测器作为参考,并得出哪一个更适合在下一代设备中实现。
Using FPGA implementations for evaluation of internet retransmission-time-out predictors
The congestion control avoidance of TCP (Transport Control Protocol), the most used protocol in Internet, is based on critical RTT (Round Trip Time) forecasting process. Currently, several delay predictors are proposed in literature; but practical implementations have not been yet evaluated. In this paper, a comparison of on-line predictors is presented. We used Altera Cyclone IV GX FPGA (Field-Programmable Gate Array) for evaluation; the criteria included performance time, power, and number of logic elements. For comparison purposes, we considered the most used predictor as reference and concluded which one is more suitable for implementation in next generation devices.