次贷危机——关于“可持续”和“有机”监管体系的一些思考

J. Markham
{"title":"次贷危机——关于“可持续”和“有机”监管体系的一些思考","authors":"J. Markham","doi":"10.25148/LAWREV.4.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Nation is now in the midst of one of the greatest financial crises in its history. Much of the blame for this condition is being placed on the bursting of the residential real estate bubble, which was fueled in large part by the reckless expansion of subprime mortgage lending. Those mortgages began defaulting in droves as the Federal Reserve Board drove up interest rates, causing massive losses at Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Countrywide Financial Group, American International Group and Merrill Lynch, to name a few. Those losses were shocking but paled in comparison to the failures of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns and the placing of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. Massive bailout packages for the financial service firms failed to restart lending, the country slipped into recession and unemployment soared. The subprime crisis had other ripple effects. The Dow Jones Industrial average was down 47 percent on February 19, 2009 from the high of 14,087 that was reached on October 1, 2007. This devastated retirement savings, college and other endowments, and every other investor in the market.On the other side of the equation were the subprime borrowers. They too were devastated by the subprime crisis as their adjustable rate mortgages (which had been originally issued at low \"teaser\" rates) reset at unaffordable levels. Foreclosures became an epidemic in many communities across the country, Florida being one of the worst centers for those sad events. Hispanics were also a particular target for subprime lenders. Hispanic homeownership in the United States grew by 47 percent between 2000 and 2007, compared to an overall homeownership increase of 8 percent. Tellingly, that growth was fueled by the fact that some 47 percent of mortgage loans to Hispanics were subprime and many of those loans are now being foreclosed. The African-American community has also been hard hit by the subprime crisis. Over one half of mortgage loans to African-Americans in 2006 were subprime, and they too are facing massive foreclosures. These problems have been blamed on flaws in the financial regulatory structure, and Congress has now begun the process of restructuring that regulation. This Article discusses the subprime mortgage market and the flaws in the financial system that led to the present crisis, and it will then provide some suggestions on regulatory reform.","PeriodicalId":431402,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Subprime Crisis - Some Thoughts on a 'Sustainable' and 'Organic' Regulatory System\",\"authors\":\"J. Markham\",\"doi\":\"10.25148/LAWREV.4.2.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Nation is now in the midst of one of the greatest financial crises in its history. Much of the blame for this condition is being placed on the bursting of the residential real estate bubble, which was fueled in large part by the reckless expansion of subprime mortgage lending. Those mortgages began defaulting in droves as the Federal Reserve Board drove up interest rates, causing massive losses at Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Countrywide Financial Group, American International Group and Merrill Lynch, to name a few. Those losses were shocking but paled in comparison to the failures of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns and the placing of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. Massive bailout packages for the financial service firms failed to restart lending, the country slipped into recession and unemployment soared. The subprime crisis had other ripple effects. The Dow Jones Industrial average was down 47 percent on February 19, 2009 from the high of 14,087 that was reached on October 1, 2007. This devastated retirement savings, college and other endowments, and every other investor in the market.On the other side of the equation were the subprime borrowers. They too were devastated by the subprime crisis as their adjustable rate mortgages (which had been originally issued at low \\\"teaser\\\" rates) reset at unaffordable levels. Foreclosures became an epidemic in many communities across the country, Florida being one of the worst centers for those sad events. Hispanics were also a particular target for subprime lenders. Hispanic homeownership in the United States grew by 47 percent between 2000 and 2007, compared to an overall homeownership increase of 8 percent. Tellingly, that growth was fueled by the fact that some 47 percent of mortgage loans to Hispanics were subprime and many of those loans are now being foreclosed. The African-American community has also been hard hit by the subprime crisis. Over one half of mortgage loans to African-Americans in 2006 were subprime, and they too are facing massive foreclosures. These problems have been blamed on flaws in the financial regulatory structure, and Congress has now begun the process of restructuring that regulation. This Article discusses the subprime mortgage market and the flaws in the financial system that led to the present crisis, and it will then provide some suggestions on regulatory reform.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.4.2.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Securities Law: U.S. (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25148/LAWREV.4.2.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美国现在正处于历史上最严重的金融危机之中。造成这种状况的主要原因是住宅房地产泡沫的破裂,这在很大程度上是由于次级抵押贷款的盲目扩张。随着联邦储备委员会提高利率,这些抵押贷款开始大量违约,导致贝尔斯登、雷曼兄弟、摩根士丹利、花旗集团、美联银行、华盛顿互惠银行、全国金融集团、美国国际集团和美林证券等遭受巨额损失。这些损失令人震惊,但与雷曼兄弟(Lehman Brothers)和贝尔斯登(Bear Stearns)的破产以及房地美(Freddie Mac)和房利美(Fannie Mae)的破产相比,就相形见绌了。针对金融服务公司的大规模救助计划未能重启贷款,希腊陷入衰退,失业率飙升。次贷危机还产生了其他连锁反应。2009年2月19日,道琼斯工业平均指数从2007年10月1日达到的14,087点高点下跌了47%。这摧毁了退休储蓄、大学和其他捐赠基金,以及市场上的所有其他投资者。在等式的另一边是次级借款人。他们也在次贷危机中遭受重创,因为他们的可调利率抵押贷款(最初以较低的“诱惑”利率发行)重新调整到无法承受的水平。丧失抵押品赎回权成为全国许多社区的流行病,佛罗里达州是这些悲惨事件发生最严重的中心之一。拉美裔人也是次级贷款机构的特别目标。2000年至2007年间,美国的西班牙裔住房拥有率增长了47%,而总体住房拥有率仅增长了8%。很明显,这一增长是由一个事实推动的,即大约47%的西班牙裔抵押贷款是次级抵押贷款,其中许多贷款现在被取消赎回权。非裔美国人社区也受到次贷危机的沉重打击。2006年发放给非洲裔美国人的抵押贷款中有一半以上是次级抵押贷款,他们也面临着大规模的止赎。这些问题一直被归咎于金融监管结构的缺陷,国会现在已经开始了重组监管的进程。本文讨论了次级抵押贷款市场和导致当前危机的金融体系的缺陷,并提出了监管改革的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Subprime Crisis - Some Thoughts on a 'Sustainable' and 'Organic' Regulatory System
The Nation is now in the midst of one of the greatest financial crises in its history. Much of the blame for this condition is being placed on the bursting of the residential real estate bubble, which was fueled in large part by the reckless expansion of subprime mortgage lending. Those mortgages began defaulting in droves as the Federal Reserve Board drove up interest rates, causing massive losses at Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wachovia, Washington Mutual, Countrywide Financial Group, American International Group and Merrill Lynch, to name a few. Those losses were shocking but paled in comparison to the failures of Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns and the placing of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae into conservatorship. Massive bailout packages for the financial service firms failed to restart lending, the country slipped into recession and unemployment soared. The subprime crisis had other ripple effects. The Dow Jones Industrial average was down 47 percent on February 19, 2009 from the high of 14,087 that was reached on October 1, 2007. This devastated retirement savings, college and other endowments, and every other investor in the market.On the other side of the equation were the subprime borrowers. They too were devastated by the subprime crisis as their adjustable rate mortgages (which had been originally issued at low "teaser" rates) reset at unaffordable levels. Foreclosures became an epidemic in many communities across the country, Florida being one of the worst centers for those sad events. Hispanics were also a particular target for subprime lenders. Hispanic homeownership in the United States grew by 47 percent between 2000 and 2007, compared to an overall homeownership increase of 8 percent. Tellingly, that growth was fueled by the fact that some 47 percent of mortgage loans to Hispanics were subprime and many of those loans are now being foreclosed. The African-American community has also been hard hit by the subprime crisis. Over one half of mortgage loans to African-Americans in 2006 were subprime, and they too are facing massive foreclosures. These problems have been blamed on flaws in the financial regulatory structure, and Congress has now begun the process of restructuring that regulation. This Article discusses the subprime mortgage market and the flaws in the financial system that led to the present crisis, and it will then provide some suggestions on regulatory reform.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信