专家知识诱导逻辑张量网络:轴承故障诊断案例研究

Maximilian-Peter Radtke, Jürgen Bock
{"title":"专家知识诱导逻辑张量网络:轴承故障诊断案例研究","authors":"Maximilian-Peter Radtke, Jürgen Bock","doi":"10.36001/phme.2022.v7i1.3329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the recent past deep learning approaches have achieved some remarkable results in the area of fault diagnostics and anomaly detection. Nevertheless, these algorithms rely on large amounts of data, which is often not available, and produce outputs, which are hard to interpret. These deficiencies make real life applications difficult. Before the broad success of deep learning machine faults were often classified using domain expert knowledge based on experience and physical models. In comparison, these approaches only require small amounts of data and produce highly interpretable results. On the downside, however, they struggle to predict unexpected patterns hidden in data. Merging these two concepts promises to increase accuracy, robustness and interpretability of models. In this paper we present a hybrid approach to combine expert knowledge with deep learning and evaluate it on rolling element bearing fault detection. First, we create a knowledge base for fault classification derived from the expected physical attributes of different faults in the envelope spectrum of vibration signals. This knowledge is used to derive a similarity function for comparing input signals to expected faulty signals. Afterwards, the similarity measure is incorporated into different neural networks using a Logic Tensor Network (LTN). This enables logical reasoning in the loss function, in which we aim to mimic the decision process of an expert analyzing the input data. Further, we extend LTNs by weight schedules for axiom groups. We show that our approach outperforms the baseline models on two bearing fault data sets with different attributes and directly gives a better understanding of whether or not fault signals are influenced by other effects or behave as expected.","PeriodicalId":422825,"journal":{"name":"PHM Society European Conference","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Knowledge Induced Logic Tensor Networks: A Bearing Fault Diagnosis Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Maximilian-Peter Radtke, Jürgen Bock\",\"doi\":\"10.36001/phme.2022.v7i1.3329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the recent past deep learning approaches have achieved some remarkable results in the area of fault diagnostics and anomaly detection. Nevertheless, these algorithms rely on large amounts of data, which is often not available, and produce outputs, which are hard to interpret. These deficiencies make real life applications difficult. Before the broad success of deep learning machine faults were often classified using domain expert knowledge based on experience and physical models. In comparison, these approaches only require small amounts of data and produce highly interpretable results. On the downside, however, they struggle to predict unexpected patterns hidden in data. Merging these two concepts promises to increase accuracy, robustness and interpretability of models. In this paper we present a hybrid approach to combine expert knowledge with deep learning and evaluate it on rolling element bearing fault detection. First, we create a knowledge base for fault classification derived from the expected physical attributes of different faults in the envelope spectrum of vibration signals. This knowledge is used to derive a similarity function for comparing input signals to expected faulty signals. Afterwards, the similarity measure is incorporated into different neural networks using a Logic Tensor Network (LTN). This enables logical reasoning in the loss function, in which we aim to mimic the decision process of an expert analyzing the input data. Further, we extend LTNs by weight schedules for axiom groups. We show that our approach outperforms the baseline models on two bearing fault data sets with different attributes and directly gives a better understanding of whether or not fault signals are influenced by other effects or behave as expected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":422825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PHM Society European Conference\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PHM Society European Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2022.v7i1.3329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PHM Society European Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36001/phme.2022.v7i1.3329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,深度学习方法在故障诊断和异常检测领域取得了一些显著的成果。然而,这些算法依赖于大量的数据,而这些数据通常是不可用的,并且产生的输出很难解释。这些缺陷使实际应用变得困难。在深度学习取得广泛成功之前,机器故障通常使用基于经验和物理模型的领域专家知识进行分类。相比之下,这些方法只需要少量的数据,并产生高度可解释的结果。然而,不利的一面是,它们很难预测隐藏在数据中的意外模式。合并这两个概念有望提高模型的准确性、健壮性和可解释性。本文提出了一种结合专家知识和深度学习的混合方法,并对其在滚动轴承故障检测中的应用进行了评价。首先,根据振动信号包络谱中不同故障的预期物理属性,建立故障分类知识库;这个知识被用来推导一个相似函数来比较输入信号和预期的故障信号。然后,使用逻辑张量网络(LTN)将相似性度量并入不同的神经网络。这使得损失函数中的逻辑推理成为可能,我们的目标是模仿专家分析输入数据的决策过程。进一步,我们通过公理群的权调度扩展ltn。我们表明,我们的方法在两个具有不同属性的轴承故障数据集上优于基线模型,并直接更好地理解故障信号是否受到其他影响或表现如预期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Knowledge Induced Logic Tensor Networks: A Bearing Fault Diagnosis Case Study
In the recent past deep learning approaches have achieved some remarkable results in the area of fault diagnostics and anomaly detection. Nevertheless, these algorithms rely on large amounts of data, which is often not available, and produce outputs, which are hard to interpret. These deficiencies make real life applications difficult. Before the broad success of deep learning machine faults were often classified using domain expert knowledge based on experience and physical models. In comparison, these approaches only require small amounts of data and produce highly interpretable results. On the downside, however, they struggle to predict unexpected patterns hidden in data. Merging these two concepts promises to increase accuracy, robustness and interpretability of models. In this paper we present a hybrid approach to combine expert knowledge with deep learning and evaluate it on rolling element bearing fault detection. First, we create a knowledge base for fault classification derived from the expected physical attributes of different faults in the envelope spectrum of vibration signals. This knowledge is used to derive a similarity function for comparing input signals to expected faulty signals. Afterwards, the similarity measure is incorporated into different neural networks using a Logic Tensor Network (LTN). This enables logical reasoning in the loss function, in which we aim to mimic the decision process of an expert analyzing the input data. Further, we extend LTNs by weight schedules for axiom groups. We show that our approach outperforms the baseline models on two bearing fault data sets with different attributes and directly gives a better understanding of whether or not fault signals are influenced by other effects or behave as expected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信