当股权失败——收入分享作为最后手段的评估

C. Haas, Thomas Heyden
{"title":"当股权失败——收入分享作为最后手段的评估","authors":"C. Haas, Thomas Heyden","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3402623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the trade-off venture capitalists encounter in a financing framework under moral hazard. The venture capitalist has the option to supply funds either within a revenue-sharing contract or via equity but faces a hidden effort problem. While projects with a low degree of moral hazard yield higher returns to the venture capitalist when financed by equity, revenue-sharing contracts become superior as moral hazard increases. At high moral hazard levels, revenue sharing becomes the sole financing option and hence can raise welfare. We apply our model in the context of initial coin offerings as a modern form of revenue sharing.","PeriodicalId":119201,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When Equity Fails – An Appraisal of Revenue Sharing As the Last Resort\",\"authors\":\"C. Haas, Thomas Heyden\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3402623\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the trade-off venture capitalists encounter in a financing framework under moral hazard. The venture capitalist has the option to supply funds either within a revenue-sharing contract or via equity but faces a hidden effort problem. While projects with a low degree of moral hazard yield higher returns to the venture capitalist when financed by equity, revenue-sharing contracts become superior as moral hazard increases. At high moral hazard levels, revenue sharing becomes the sole financing option and hence can raise welfare. We apply our model in the context of initial coin offerings as a modern form of revenue sharing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":119201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"volume\":\"85 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402623\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3402623","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我们研究了风险投资家在道德风险下的融资框架中遇到的权衡。风险资本家可以选择在收入分成合同中或通过股权提供资金,但面临着隐性努力问题。虽然道德风险程度低的项目在股权融资时对风险资本家的回报更高,但随着道德风险的增加,收益分成合同变得更优。在道德风险较高的情况下,收入分享成为唯一的融资选择,因此可以提高福利。我们将我们的模型应用于首次代币发行的背景下,作为一种现代形式的收入分享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When Equity Fails – An Appraisal of Revenue Sharing As the Last Resort
We study the trade-off venture capitalists encounter in a financing framework under moral hazard. The venture capitalist has the option to supply funds either within a revenue-sharing contract or via equity but faces a hidden effort problem. While projects with a low degree of moral hazard yield higher returns to the venture capitalist when financed by equity, revenue-sharing contracts become superior as moral hazard increases. At high moral hazard levels, revenue sharing becomes the sole financing option and hence can raise welfare. We apply our model in the context of initial coin offerings as a modern form of revenue sharing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信