简要回顾定量神经肌肉监测装置的历史和技术进展

Wonjin Lee, K. Jung
{"title":"简要回顾定量神经肌肉监测装置的历史和技术进展","authors":"Wonjin Lee, K. Jung","doi":"10.30579/mbse.2021.4.2.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Corresponding author Ki Tae Jung Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-dearo, Donggu, Gwangju 61453, Korea Tel: +82-62-220-3223 Fax: +82-62-223-2333 E-mail: mdmole@chosun.ac.kr ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2486-9961 Anesthetic procedures using a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) always have a potential risk of residual neuromuscular block (RNMB) associated with serious respiratory complications despite the use of reversal agents. Due to the risk of RNMB, neuromuscular monitoring is a very important tool for assessing patient safety. Recently, the importance of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring has been highlighted because of the advent of sugammadex, which determines dosage based on the degree of NMB. Neuromuscular monitoring, which has been used clinically since the 1970s, is an appropriate method for assessing the level of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) after the use of a NMBD during anesthesia. Although the basic principles have not changed considerably, recent technical advances in neuromuscular monitoring devices can help anesthesiologists with convenient quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to accurately evaluate the levels of NMB, choose an appropriate NMBD, and avoid RNMB. The recently released electromyography-based devices provide more accurate values than acceleromyography (AMG). Although AMG has a problem with overestimation, modern AMG devices with new three-dimensional technology overcome this limitation. Anesthesiologists should increase their knowledge of neuromuscular mechanisms and monitoring, including how to use the latest device for proper neuromuscular monitoring and patient safety. In this review, we have explored the short history of neuromuscular monitoring devices and the latest trends in technology development.","PeriodicalId":259565,"journal":{"name":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A short review of history and technical advances in quantitative neuromuscular monitoring devices\",\"authors\":\"Wonjin Lee, K. Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.30579/mbse.2021.4.2.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Corresponding author Ki Tae Jung Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-dearo, Donggu, Gwangju 61453, Korea Tel: +82-62-220-3223 Fax: +82-62-223-2333 E-mail: mdmole@chosun.ac.kr ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2486-9961 Anesthetic procedures using a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) always have a potential risk of residual neuromuscular block (RNMB) associated with serious respiratory complications despite the use of reversal agents. Due to the risk of RNMB, neuromuscular monitoring is a very important tool for assessing patient safety. Recently, the importance of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring has been highlighted because of the advent of sugammadex, which determines dosage based on the degree of NMB. Neuromuscular monitoring, which has been used clinically since the 1970s, is an appropriate method for assessing the level of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) after the use of a NMBD during anesthesia. Although the basic principles have not changed considerably, recent technical advances in neuromuscular monitoring devices can help anesthesiologists with convenient quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to accurately evaluate the levels of NMB, choose an appropriate NMBD, and avoid RNMB. The recently released electromyography-based devices provide more accurate values than acceleromyography (AMG). Although AMG has a problem with overestimation, modern AMG devices with new three-dimensional technology overcome this limitation. Anesthesiologists should increase their knowledge of neuromuscular mechanisms and monitoring, including how to use the latest device for proper neuromuscular monitoring and patient safety. In this review, we have explored the short history of neuromuscular monitoring devices and the latest trends in technology development.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Biological Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30579/mbse.2021.4.2.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Biological Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30579/mbse.2021.4.2.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通讯作者Ki Tae Jung朝鲜大学医院麻醉与疼痛医学科,365 Pilmun-dearo,东区,光州61453,韩国电话:+82-62-220-3223传真:+82-62-223-2333 E-mail: mdmole@chosun.ac.kr ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2486-9961麻醉过程中使用神经肌肉阻断药物(NMBD)始终存在残留神经肌肉阻滞(RNMB)的潜在风险,尽管使用逆转药物,但仍存在严重呼吸系统并发症。由于rmb的风险,神经肌肉监测是评估患者安全的一个非常重要的工具。最近,由于sugammadex的出现,定量神经肌肉监测的重要性得到了强调,它根据NMB的程度来确定剂量。神经肌肉监测自20世纪70年代开始应用于临床,是评估麻醉过程中使用NMBD后神经肌肉阻断(NMB)水平的合适方法。虽然基本原理没有太大变化,但近年来神经肌肉监测装置的技术进步可以帮助麻醉师通过方便的神经肌肉定量监测,准确评估NMB水平,选择合适的NMBD,避免rmb。最近发布的基于肌电图的设备提供比加速肌图(AMG)更准确的值。虽然AMG存在高估的问题,但现代AMG设备采用新的三维技术克服了这一限制。麻醉师应该增加他们对神经肌肉机制和监测的知识,包括如何使用最新的设备进行适当的神经肌肉监测和患者安全。在这篇综述中,我们探讨了神经肌肉监测装置的短暂历史和技术发展的最新趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A short review of history and technical advances in quantitative neuromuscular monitoring devices
Corresponding author Ki Tae Jung Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, 365 Pilmun-dearo, Donggu, Gwangju 61453, Korea Tel: +82-62-220-3223 Fax: +82-62-223-2333 E-mail: mdmole@chosun.ac.kr ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2486-9961 Anesthetic procedures using a neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD) always have a potential risk of residual neuromuscular block (RNMB) associated with serious respiratory complications despite the use of reversal agents. Due to the risk of RNMB, neuromuscular monitoring is a very important tool for assessing patient safety. Recently, the importance of quantitative neuromuscular monitoring has been highlighted because of the advent of sugammadex, which determines dosage based on the degree of NMB. Neuromuscular monitoring, which has been used clinically since the 1970s, is an appropriate method for assessing the level of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) after the use of a NMBD during anesthesia. Although the basic principles have not changed considerably, recent technical advances in neuromuscular monitoring devices can help anesthesiologists with convenient quantitative neuromuscular monitoring to accurately evaluate the levels of NMB, choose an appropriate NMBD, and avoid RNMB. The recently released electromyography-based devices provide more accurate values than acceleromyography (AMG). Although AMG has a problem with overestimation, modern AMG devices with new three-dimensional technology overcome this limitation. Anesthesiologists should increase their knowledge of neuromuscular mechanisms and monitoring, including how to use the latest device for proper neuromuscular monitoring and patient safety. In this review, we have explored the short history of neuromuscular monitoring devices and the latest trends in technology development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信