{"title":"第一次沟通","authors":"S. Harper","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780199329472.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The long shadow cast by the minister’s rejection explains why Smith’s memory formed and re-formed as it did in the context of later experiences. In 1835 Joseph Smith consolidated, and his scribe recorded, a spontaneous memory of his first vision. It differs markedly from his other accounts primarily because it was cued spontaneously by a conversation, not by a premeditated effort to record autobiography. It shows that, given the right cues and context, he could make a memory that did not need to respond to the Methodist minister, whether to please him (as in 1832) or to rebuke him (as in 1838/39).","PeriodicalId":249520,"journal":{"name":"First Vision","volume":"11 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Communication\",\"authors\":\"S. Harper\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OSO/9780199329472.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The long shadow cast by the minister’s rejection explains why Smith’s memory formed and re-formed as it did in the context of later experiences. In 1835 Joseph Smith consolidated, and his scribe recorded, a spontaneous memory of his first vision. It differs markedly from his other accounts primarily because it was cued spontaneously by a conversation, not by a premeditated effort to record autobiography. It shows that, given the right cues and context, he could make a memory that did not need to respond to the Methodist minister, whether to please him (as in 1832) or to rebuke him (as in 1838/39).\",\"PeriodicalId\":249520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"First Vision\",\"volume\":\"11 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"First Vision\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199329472.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"First Vision","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780199329472.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The long shadow cast by the minister’s rejection explains why Smith’s memory formed and re-formed as it did in the context of later experiences. In 1835 Joseph Smith consolidated, and his scribe recorded, a spontaneous memory of his first vision. It differs markedly from his other accounts primarily because it was cued spontaneously by a conversation, not by a premeditated effort to record autobiography. It shows that, given the right cues and context, he could make a memory that did not need to respond to the Methodist minister, whether to please him (as in 1832) or to rebuke him (as in 1838/39).