改进飞机初步设计过程的软件工具开发

Willem A. J. Anemaat, B. Kaushik, J. Carroll, J. Jeffery
{"title":"改进飞机初步设计过程的软件工具开发","authors":"Willem A. J. Anemaat, B. Kaushik, J. Carroll, J. Jeffery","doi":"10.3233/978-1-61499-302-5-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aircraft design is a compromise of many different disciplines. Yet the history books are littered with projects that failed because something was overlooked in the early design stages that have come back to haunt it in the latter stages. This is very evident when it comes to evaluation of flying qualities and aircraft behavior as this is almost left out of the overall picture in the early design phases. It has long been considered that first order approximations are sufficient to indicate any issues in the early stages of design, but these can only show so much and are built on simplifications and approximations of a standard set of modes of motion. As airframes move away from classical designs due to improved materials, advanced manufacturing techniques evolve, or the improved efficiency associated with unconventional designs, so the approximations break down further. At this point it becomes prudent to perform more detailed assessment earlier in the project lifecycle. However, this too can have issues as it may be viewed that there is insufficient data, or the airframe is too complex to build a mathematical model. Then there is the question as to what to test and as such 6-DoF flight modeling is left until later in the process. This can have obvious consequences further down the project as 80% of the project and lifecycle costs are committed in the first 20% of the design. This immediately identifies that more effort should be put in the initial 20% to evaluate the complete design including flight modeling. All the problems and issues that are presented above are now solvable through modern modeling techniques and software tools. This paper describes the tools developed to integrate flight simulation early on in the design process. Aerodynamics, stability and control estimates from the Advanced Aircraft Analysis software are corrected with the use of wind tunnel data, wind tunnel data is scaled to full size airplane and actual flight conditions. This data is then fed into the J2 Universal Toolkit to actually fly the airplane. Quality 6-DoF models can be built with minimal data and relative ease allowing engineers to start to look at running detailed analyses across multiple ideas and options very quickly and much earlier in the design process combining the more detailed handling qualities assessment with the aerodynamic evaluation, performance, propulsion and weight calculations right from the beginning of the design. Each point in the regulations has a configuration and maneuver associated with proofing compliance, these configurations and maneuvers can be set up in the modeling tool and all ideas and options can be evaluated. This very quickly identifies areas where the aircraft cannot get certified, and these ideas can then either be eliminated or modified. By following an integrated approach and implementing full 6-DoF flight modeling from the early stages of the design using simple methods initially, looking at sensitivity studies and the impact of tolerances throughout the process, and flying the complete certification envelope throughout the design provides a truly concurrent engineering approach to the design as all other disciplines feed into and have an impact on the behavior and flying qualities. This method allows more ideas to be evaluated earlier, enables the impact of changes to be tracked, and ensures that no surprises remain by the time the first flight comes around. This can reduce timescales, reduce the amount and cost of re-work to fix issues following flight test, and result in a better all-round design. The paper shows the tools developed, the processes followed and an example airplane design using these tools.","PeriodicalId":213842,"journal":{"name":"ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software Tool Development to Improve the Airplane Preliminary Design Process\",\"authors\":\"Willem A. J. Anemaat, B. Kaushik, J. Carroll, J. Jeffery\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/978-1-61499-302-5-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aircraft design is a compromise of many different disciplines. Yet the history books are littered with projects that failed because something was overlooked in the early design stages that have come back to haunt it in the latter stages. This is very evident when it comes to evaluation of flying qualities and aircraft behavior as this is almost left out of the overall picture in the early design phases. It has long been considered that first order approximations are sufficient to indicate any issues in the early stages of design, but these can only show so much and are built on simplifications and approximations of a standard set of modes of motion. As airframes move away from classical designs due to improved materials, advanced manufacturing techniques evolve, or the improved efficiency associated with unconventional designs, so the approximations break down further. At this point it becomes prudent to perform more detailed assessment earlier in the project lifecycle. However, this too can have issues as it may be viewed that there is insufficient data, or the airframe is too complex to build a mathematical model. Then there is the question as to what to test and as such 6-DoF flight modeling is left until later in the process. This can have obvious consequences further down the project as 80% of the project and lifecycle costs are committed in the first 20% of the design. This immediately identifies that more effort should be put in the initial 20% to evaluate the complete design including flight modeling. All the problems and issues that are presented above are now solvable through modern modeling techniques and software tools. This paper describes the tools developed to integrate flight simulation early on in the design process. Aerodynamics, stability and control estimates from the Advanced Aircraft Analysis software are corrected with the use of wind tunnel data, wind tunnel data is scaled to full size airplane and actual flight conditions. This data is then fed into the J2 Universal Toolkit to actually fly the airplane. Quality 6-DoF models can be built with minimal data and relative ease allowing engineers to start to look at running detailed analyses across multiple ideas and options very quickly and much earlier in the design process combining the more detailed handling qualities assessment with the aerodynamic evaluation, performance, propulsion and weight calculations right from the beginning of the design. Each point in the regulations has a configuration and maneuver associated with proofing compliance, these configurations and maneuvers can be set up in the modeling tool and all ideas and options can be evaluated. This very quickly identifies areas where the aircraft cannot get certified, and these ideas can then either be eliminated or modified. By following an integrated approach and implementing full 6-DoF flight modeling from the early stages of the design using simple methods initially, looking at sensitivity studies and the impact of tolerances throughout the process, and flying the complete certification envelope throughout the design provides a truly concurrent engineering approach to the design as all other disciplines feed into and have an impact on the behavior and flying qualities. This method allows more ideas to be evaluated earlier, enables the impact of changes to be tracked, and ensures that no surprises remain by the time the first flight comes around. This can reduce timescales, reduce the amount and cost of re-work to fix issues following flight test, and result in a better all-round design. The paper shows the tools developed, the processes followed and an example airplane design using these tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213842,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-302-5-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-302-5-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

飞机设计是许多不同学科的综合。然而,由于在早期设计阶段忽略了某些内容而导致项目在后期阶段再次出现问题而导致失败的项目比比皆是。当涉及到飞行质量和飞机行为的评估时,这一点非常明显,因为在早期设计阶段,这几乎被排除在整体画面之外。长期以来,人们一直认为一阶近似足以表明设计早期阶段的任何问题,但这些只能显示这么多,并且是建立在一组标准运动模式的简化和近似上。由于改进的材料,先进的制造技术的发展,或者与非常规设计相关的效率的提高,机身远离经典设计,因此近似进一步打破。在这一点上,在项目生命周期的早期执行更详细的评估变得谨慎起来。然而,这也可能有问题,因为它可能被视为有数据不足,或机身太复杂,无法建立一个数学模型。然后还有一个问题是要测试什么,因此6-DoF飞行建模直到后来的过程中。由于80%的项目和生命周期成本都是在设计的前20%投入的,因此这会对项目的后续发展产生明显的影响。这立即表明应该在最初的20%中投入更多的精力来评估包括飞行建模在内的完整设计。通过现代建模技术和软件工具,上述所有问题都可以得到解决。本文描述了在设计过程早期集成飞行模拟的工具。空气动力学、稳定性和控制估计来自先进的飞机分析软件使用风洞数据进行校正,风洞数据被缩放到全尺寸飞机和实际飞行条件。然后将这些数据输入到J2通用工具包中,以实际驾驶飞机。高质量的6自由度模型可以以最少的数据和相对容易的方式构建,使工程师能够在设计过程中非常快速和更早地开始对多个想法和选项进行详细的分析,并将更详细的处理质量评估与空气动力学评估、性能、推进力和重量计算结合起来。法规中的每个点都有与证明合规性相关的配置和操作,这些配置和操作可以在建模工具中设置,并且可以评估所有的想法和选项。这可以很快识别出飞机无法获得认证的领域,然后这些想法可以被消除或修改。通过遵循一种综合方法,从设计的早期阶段开始使用简单的方法实现完整的6自由度飞行建模,在整个过程中观察灵敏度研究和公差的影响,并在整个设计中飞行完整的认证包,为设计提供了一种真正的并行工程方法,因为所有其他学科都会对行为和飞行质量产生影响。这种方法允许更早地评估更多的想法,使更改的影响能够被跟踪,并确保在第一次飞行时不会出现意外。这可以减少时间尺度,减少在飞行测试后修复问题的重做的数量和成本,并导致更好的全面设计。本文介绍了所开发的工具、所遵循的过程以及使用这些工具进行飞机设计的实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Software Tool Development to Improve the Airplane Preliminary Design Process
Aircraft design is a compromise of many different disciplines. Yet the history books are littered with projects that failed because something was overlooked in the early design stages that have come back to haunt it in the latter stages. This is very evident when it comes to evaluation of flying qualities and aircraft behavior as this is almost left out of the overall picture in the early design phases. It has long been considered that first order approximations are sufficient to indicate any issues in the early stages of design, but these can only show so much and are built on simplifications and approximations of a standard set of modes of motion. As airframes move away from classical designs due to improved materials, advanced manufacturing techniques evolve, or the improved efficiency associated with unconventional designs, so the approximations break down further. At this point it becomes prudent to perform more detailed assessment earlier in the project lifecycle. However, this too can have issues as it may be viewed that there is insufficient data, or the airframe is too complex to build a mathematical model. Then there is the question as to what to test and as such 6-DoF flight modeling is left until later in the process. This can have obvious consequences further down the project as 80% of the project and lifecycle costs are committed in the first 20% of the design. This immediately identifies that more effort should be put in the initial 20% to evaluate the complete design including flight modeling. All the problems and issues that are presented above are now solvable through modern modeling techniques and software tools. This paper describes the tools developed to integrate flight simulation early on in the design process. Aerodynamics, stability and control estimates from the Advanced Aircraft Analysis software are corrected with the use of wind tunnel data, wind tunnel data is scaled to full size airplane and actual flight conditions. This data is then fed into the J2 Universal Toolkit to actually fly the airplane. Quality 6-DoF models can be built with minimal data and relative ease allowing engineers to start to look at running detailed analyses across multiple ideas and options very quickly and much earlier in the design process combining the more detailed handling qualities assessment with the aerodynamic evaluation, performance, propulsion and weight calculations right from the beginning of the design. Each point in the regulations has a configuration and maneuver associated with proofing compliance, these configurations and maneuvers can be set up in the modeling tool and all ideas and options can be evaluated. This very quickly identifies areas where the aircraft cannot get certified, and these ideas can then either be eliminated or modified. By following an integrated approach and implementing full 6-DoF flight modeling from the early stages of the design using simple methods initially, looking at sensitivity studies and the impact of tolerances throughout the process, and flying the complete certification envelope throughout the design provides a truly concurrent engineering approach to the design as all other disciplines feed into and have an impact on the behavior and flying qualities. This method allows more ideas to be evaluated earlier, enables the impact of changes to be tracked, and ensures that no surprises remain by the time the first flight comes around. This can reduce timescales, reduce the amount and cost of re-work to fix issues following flight test, and result in a better all-round design. The paper shows the tools developed, the processes followed and an example airplane design using these tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信