有机体能动性的本体论:康德的方法

Hugh Desmond, P. Huneman
{"title":"有机体能动性的本体论:康德的方法","authors":"Hugh Desmond, P. Huneman","doi":"10.1515/9783110604665-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Biologists explain organisms ’ behavior not only as having been programmed by genes and shaped by natural selection, but also as the result of an organism ’ s agency: the capacity to react to environmental changes in goal-driven ways. The use of such ‘ agential explanations ’ reopens old questions about how justified it is to ascribe agency to entities like bacteria or plants that obviously lack rationality and even a nervous system. Is organismic agency genuinely ‘ real ’ or is it just a useful fiction? In this paper we focus on two questions: whether agential explanations are to be interpreted ontically, and whether they can be reduced to non-agential explanations (thereby dispensing with agency). The Kantian approach we identify interprets agential explanations non-ontically, yet holds agency to be indispensable. Attributing agency to organisms is not to be taken literally in the way we attribute physical properties such as mass or acceleration, but nor is it a mere heuristic or predictive tool. Rather, it is an inevitable consequence of our own rational capacity: as long as we are rational agents ourselves, we cannot avoid seeing agency in organisms.","PeriodicalId":331228,"journal":{"name":"Natural Born Monads","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Ontology of Organismic Agency: A Kantian Approach\",\"authors\":\"Hugh Desmond, P. Huneman\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110604665-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Biologists explain organisms ’ behavior not only as having been programmed by genes and shaped by natural selection, but also as the result of an organism ’ s agency: the capacity to react to environmental changes in goal-driven ways. The use of such ‘ agential explanations ’ reopens old questions about how justified it is to ascribe agency to entities like bacteria or plants that obviously lack rationality and even a nervous system. Is organismic agency genuinely ‘ real ’ or is it just a useful fiction? In this paper we focus on two questions: whether agential explanations are to be interpreted ontically, and whether they can be reduced to non-agential explanations (thereby dispensing with agency). The Kantian approach we identify interprets agential explanations non-ontically, yet holds agency to be indispensable. Attributing agency to organisms is not to be taken literally in the way we attribute physical properties such as mass or acceleration, but nor is it a mere heuristic or predictive tool. Rather, it is an inevitable consequence of our own rational capacity: as long as we are rational agents ourselves, we cannot avoid seeing agency in organisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":331228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Natural Born Monads\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Natural Born Monads\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110604665-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Born Monads","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110604665-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

当前位置生物学家解释生物体的行为不仅是由基因编程和自然选择形成的,而且是生物体能动性的结果:以目标驱动的方式对环境变化作出反应的能力。这种“代理解释”的使用重新引发了一个老问题,即把代理归因于细菌或植物等明显缺乏理性甚至没有神经系统的实体是多么合理。有机体能动性是真正“真实的”还是只是一个有用的虚构?在本文中,我们关注两个问题:代理解释是否可以被理性地解释,以及它们是否可以被简化为非代理解释(从而免除代理)。我们确定的康德方法是非矛盾性地解释代理解释,但认为代理是不可或缺的。给生物体赋予能动性,不能像我们赋予质量或加速度等物理特性那样从字面上理解,但它也不仅仅是一种启发式或预测工具。相反,这是我们自身理性能力的必然结果:只要我们自己是理性的能动者,我们就无法避免在生物体中看到能动者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Ontology of Organismic Agency: A Kantian Approach
: Biologists explain organisms ’ behavior not only as having been programmed by genes and shaped by natural selection, but also as the result of an organism ’ s agency: the capacity to react to environmental changes in goal-driven ways. The use of such ‘ agential explanations ’ reopens old questions about how justified it is to ascribe agency to entities like bacteria or plants that obviously lack rationality and even a nervous system. Is organismic agency genuinely ‘ real ’ or is it just a useful fiction? In this paper we focus on two questions: whether agential explanations are to be interpreted ontically, and whether they can be reduced to non-agential explanations (thereby dispensing with agency). The Kantian approach we identify interprets agential explanations non-ontically, yet holds agency to be indispensable. Attributing agency to organisms is not to be taken literally in the way we attribute physical properties such as mass or acceleration, but nor is it a mere heuristic or predictive tool. Rather, it is an inevitable consequence of our own rational capacity: as long as we are rational agents ourselves, we cannot avoid seeing agency in organisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信