肝脏和甲状腺数据模糊聚类算法性能比较研究

B. Venkataramana, L. Padmasree, M. S. Rao, D. Latha, G. Ganesan
{"title":"肝脏和甲状腺数据模糊聚类算法性能比较研究","authors":"B. Venkataramana, L. Padmasree, M. S. Rao, D. Latha, G. Ganesan","doi":"10.5899/2018/JFSVA-00395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional classification methods are difficult to analyze accurate diagnosis without ambiguities due to fast growth in technology. Since the states are vague in medicine comparative crisp ones the fuzzy methods are supportive. As fuzzy tools provide accurate results in various data sets, in this paper, we concentrate on fuzzy based clustering. In this work, a comparative study of these algorithms with Thyroid data set and liver disorder data set from the UCI repository is presented. Repository results were compared with these results. Based on the clustering output criteria the performance of these two algorithms is analyzed in terms of percentage of correctness and classification performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the performance of two popular clustering algorithms FPCM and PFCM for thyroid data and liver data, and to prove that PFCM gives better performance than FPCM for Thyroid Samples and liver samples in terms of percentage of correctness and Classification performance.","PeriodicalId":308518,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fuzzy Set Valued Analysis","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study on performance of Fuzzy clustering algorithms on Liver and Thyroid Data\",\"authors\":\"B. Venkataramana, L. Padmasree, M. S. Rao, D. Latha, G. Ganesan\",\"doi\":\"10.5899/2018/JFSVA-00395\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional classification methods are difficult to analyze accurate diagnosis without ambiguities due to fast growth in technology. Since the states are vague in medicine comparative crisp ones the fuzzy methods are supportive. As fuzzy tools provide accurate results in various data sets, in this paper, we concentrate on fuzzy based clustering. In this work, a comparative study of these algorithms with Thyroid data set and liver disorder data set from the UCI repository is presented. Repository results were compared with these results. Based on the clustering output criteria the performance of these two algorithms is analyzed in terms of percentage of correctness and classification performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the performance of two popular clustering algorithms FPCM and PFCM for thyroid data and liver data, and to prove that PFCM gives better performance than FPCM for Thyroid Samples and liver samples in terms of percentage of correctness and Classification performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Fuzzy Set Valued Analysis\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Fuzzy Set Valued Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5899/2018/JFSVA-00395\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fuzzy Set Valued Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5899/2018/JFSVA-00395","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于技术的快速发展,传统的分类方法很难分析出准确的诊断结果而不产生歧义。由于医学比较清晰的状态是模糊的,模糊方法是支持的。由于模糊工具可以在各种数据集上提供准确的结果,因此本文主要研究基于模糊的聚类。在这项工作中,这些算法与来自UCI存储库的甲状腺数据集和肝脏疾病数据集进行了比较研究。将存储库结果与这些结果进行比较。基于聚类输出标准,从正确率和分类性能两方面分析了这两种算法的性能。本文的目的是分析两种流行的聚类算法FPCM和PFCM对甲状腺样本和肝脏数据的性能,并证明PFCM在正确率和分类性能方面优于FPCM对甲状腺样本和肝脏样本的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Study on performance of Fuzzy clustering algorithms on Liver and Thyroid Data
Conventional classification methods are difficult to analyze accurate diagnosis without ambiguities due to fast growth in technology. Since the states are vague in medicine comparative crisp ones the fuzzy methods are supportive. As fuzzy tools provide accurate results in various data sets, in this paper, we concentrate on fuzzy based clustering. In this work, a comparative study of these algorithms with Thyroid data set and liver disorder data set from the UCI repository is presented. Repository results were compared with these results. Based on the clustering output criteria the performance of these two algorithms is analyzed in terms of percentage of correctness and classification performance. The objective of this paper is to analyze the performance of two popular clustering algorithms FPCM and PFCM for thyroid data and liver data, and to prove that PFCM gives better performance than FPCM for Thyroid Samples and liver samples in terms of percentage of correctness and Classification performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信