测量中心收缩压在2型糖尿病患者中的意义:一项观察性研究

Modi Kd
{"title":"测量中心收缩压在2型糖尿病患者中的意义:一项观察性研究","authors":"Modi Kd","doi":"10.37179/rijed.000008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Data clearly shows a higher incidence of COVID 19 and worse outcomes in patients with diabetes and Hypertension (30,31). Patients with T2DM are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, which is inadequately explained by conventional risk factors. CSBP is known to correlate with more cardiovascular events than standard mercury based PSBP. Diabetic patients are known to have higher CSBP than non-diabetic individuals. There is a paucity of data about CSBP in diabetic patients in India, hence there is a perceived need for more studies in this area. Design: Analytic (Cross sectional) observational study. Methods: The study was approved by the ‘Institutional Ethics Committee, Care Hospital’, Hyderabad, India. We assessed similar groups of T2DM patients and healthy individuals for CSBP measurement by “Pulsecor - BP+” device and compared them with standard mercury based brachial PSBP measurement. In hypertensive diabetic patients, the diff erences in the eff ect of various antihypertensive agents on PSBP & CSBP was also studied. Results: We found that a higher number of participants (T2DM 73% versus 61%, healthy individuals 22% versus 16.6%) had uncontrolled CSBP than the number of patients with high PSBP p < 0.01). In addition, it was observed that CSBP was better controlled in patients on RAS blockade drugs than in those receiving beta blockers (33% versus 23%). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of measuring CSBP in T2DM patients to identify and treat those who would otherwise be missed by measuring only PSBP.","PeriodicalId":305270,"journal":{"name":"Research International Journal of Endocrinology and Diabetes","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Significance of Measuring Central Systolic Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Observational Study\",\"authors\":\"Modi Kd\",\"doi\":\"10.37179/rijed.000008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Data clearly shows a higher incidence of COVID 19 and worse outcomes in patients with diabetes and Hypertension (30,31). Patients with T2DM are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, which is inadequately explained by conventional risk factors. CSBP is known to correlate with more cardiovascular events than standard mercury based PSBP. Diabetic patients are known to have higher CSBP than non-diabetic individuals. There is a paucity of data about CSBP in diabetic patients in India, hence there is a perceived need for more studies in this area. Design: Analytic (Cross sectional) observational study. Methods: The study was approved by the ‘Institutional Ethics Committee, Care Hospital’, Hyderabad, India. We assessed similar groups of T2DM patients and healthy individuals for CSBP measurement by “Pulsecor - BP+” device and compared them with standard mercury based brachial PSBP measurement. In hypertensive diabetic patients, the diff erences in the eff ect of various antihypertensive agents on PSBP & CSBP was also studied. Results: We found that a higher number of participants (T2DM 73% versus 61%, healthy individuals 22% versus 16.6%) had uncontrolled CSBP than the number of patients with high PSBP p < 0.01). In addition, it was observed that CSBP was better controlled in patients on RAS blockade drugs than in those receiving beta blockers (33% versus 23%). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of measuring CSBP in T2DM patients to identify and treat those who would otherwise be missed by measuring only PSBP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305270,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research International Journal of Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research International Journal of Endocrinology and Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37179/rijed.000008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research International Journal of Endocrinology and Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37179/rijed.000008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数据清楚地表明,糖尿病和高血压患者的COVID - 19发病率更高,预后更差(30,31)。T2DM患者发生心血管疾病的风险较高,传统的危险因素不能充分解释这一点。已知CSBP比标准汞基PSBP与更多心血管事件相关。已知糖尿病患者的CSBP高于非糖尿病患者。关于印度糖尿病患者CSBP的数据缺乏,因此需要在这一领域进行更多的研究。设计:分析(横断面)观察性研究。方法:本研究经印度海得拉巴Care Hospital机构伦理委员会批准。我们评估了相似组的T2DM患者和健康人使用“Pulsecor - BP+”装置测量CSBP,并将其与标准的基于汞的肱动脉PSBP测量进行比较。在高血压糖尿病患者中,还研究了各种降压药对PSBP和CSBP影响的差异。结果:我们发现,与高PSBP患者相比,T2DM患者(73%对61%,健康个体22%对16.6%)CSBP未控制的人数更多(p < 0.01)。此外,我们还观察到,与接受受体阻滞剂的患者相比,接受RAS阻断药物的患者的CSBP得到了更好的控制(33%对23%)。结论:本研究强调了在T2DM患者中测量CSBP对于识别和治疗那些仅通过测量PSBP而被遗漏的患者的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Significance of Measuring Central Systolic Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Observational Study
Background: Data clearly shows a higher incidence of COVID 19 and worse outcomes in patients with diabetes and Hypertension (30,31). Patients with T2DM are at a higher risk of developing cardiovascular disease, which is inadequately explained by conventional risk factors. CSBP is known to correlate with more cardiovascular events than standard mercury based PSBP. Diabetic patients are known to have higher CSBP than non-diabetic individuals. There is a paucity of data about CSBP in diabetic patients in India, hence there is a perceived need for more studies in this area. Design: Analytic (Cross sectional) observational study. Methods: The study was approved by the ‘Institutional Ethics Committee, Care Hospital’, Hyderabad, India. We assessed similar groups of T2DM patients and healthy individuals for CSBP measurement by “Pulsecor - BP+” device and compared them with standard mercury based brachial PSBP measurement. In hypertensive diabetic patients, the diff erences in the eff ect of various antihypertensive agents on PSBP & CSBP was also studied. Results: We found that a higher number of participants (T2DM 73% versus 61%, healthy individuals 22% versus 16.6%) had uncontrolled CSBP than the number of patients with high PSBP p < 0.01). In addition, it was observed that CSBP was better controlled in patients on RAS blockade drugs than in those receiving beta blockers (33% versus 23%). Conclusion: This study highlights the importance of measuring CSBP in T2DM patients to identify and treat those who would otherwise be missed by measuring only PSBP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信