书评:《社交照片:关于摄影和社交媒体》,作者:内森·尤根森

S. Amon
{"title":"书评:《社交照片:关于摄影和社交媒体》,作者:内森·尤根森","authors":"S. Amon","doi":"10.1525/aft.2019.464008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media , by Nathan Jurgenson. Verso, 2019. 144 pp./$19.95 (sb).\n\n\n\nSnapchat sociologist Nathan Jurgenson's new book, The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media , is a sprawling consideration of social media as a new photographic ecosystem. Jurgenson crystallizes a working definition of the “social photo” that works against the widespread dismissal of contemporary media culture as socially invalid and inauthentic. It also delineates the replacement of photographic nostalgia with ephemerality and reconsiders documentary vision in light of the social media feed. Jurgenson states that he aims “to sensitize more than convince,” and The Social Photo does ultimately fall short of any unified theory of social media photography (11). It skirts both the social-scientific evidence and theoretical depth that could have made a more meaningful contribution to the literature, but it seeds a rethinking of mass photography and does so fashionably.\n\nJurgenson ascribes three primary qualities to social photography, which he describes as “a type of photography made ubiquitous by networked, digital sharing” (8). It prioritizes communication over aesthetics; its images are properly understood in streams, rather than singly; and its ephemerality is key. Social photography encompasses cultural practices that surpass art history and artworld criticism, and Jurgenson makes a useful case that the presuppositions of aesthetic supremacy, technical importance, and visual originality are not productive measures of …","PeriodicalId":443446,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society","volume":"111 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review: The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media, by Nathan Jurgenson\",\"authors\":\"S. Amon\",\"doi\":\"10.1525/aft.2019.464008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media , by Nathan Jurgenson. Verso, 2019. 144 pp./$19.95 (sb).\\n\\n\\n\\nSnapchat sociologist Nathan Jurgenson's new book, The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media , is a sprawling consideration of social media as a new photographic ecosystem. Jurgenson crystallizes a working definition of the “social photo” that works against the widespread dismissal of contemporary media culture as socially invalid and inauthentic. It also delineates the replacement of photographic nostalgia with ephemerality and reconsiders documentary vision in light of the social media feed. Jurgenson states that he aims “to sensitize more than convince,” and The Social Photo does ultimately fall short of any unified theory of social media photography (11). It skirts both the social-scientific evidence and theoretical depth that could have made a more meaningful contribution to the literature, but it seeds a rethinking of mass photography and does so fashionably.\\n\\nJurgenson ascribes three primary qualities to social photography, which he describes as “a type of photography made ubiquitous by networked, digital sharing” (8). It prioritizes communication over aesthetics; its images are properly understood in streams, rather than singly; and its ephemerality is key. Social photography encompasses cultural practices that surpass art history and artworld criticism, and Jurgenson makes a useful case that the presuppositions of aesthetic supremacy, technical importance, and visual originality are not productive measures of …\",\"PeriodicalId\":443446,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1525/aft.2019.464008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Technology Transfer and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/aft.2019.464008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《社交照片:关于摄影和社交媒体》,作者:内森·尤根森。左页,2019年。144页/ 19.95美元(某人)Snapchat社会学家内森·尤根森(Nathan Jurgenson)的新书《社交照片:论摄影和社交媒体》(The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media)对社交媒体作为一种新的摄影生态系统进行了广泛的思考。Jurgenson明确了“社交照片”的工作定义,以反对对当代媒体文化的普遍不屑一顾,认为它在社会上无效且不真实。它还描绘了用短暂性取代摄影怀旧,并根据社交媒体的动态重新考虑纪录片的视觉。Jurgenson表示,他的目标是“让人们更加敏感,而不是让人们信服”,而《社交照片》最终没有形成任何关于社交媒体摄影的统一理论(11)。它避开了社会科学的证据和理论的深度,这些都可以为文学做出更有意义的贡献,但它播下了对大众摄影的重新思考,并且做得很时尚。Jurgenson将社交摄影归结为三个主要特征,他将其描述为“一种通过网络、数字共享而无处不在的摄影类型”(8)。它的形象是在溪流中而不是单独地被理解的;它的短暂性是关键。社会摄影包含了超越艺术史和艺术界批评的文化实践,Jurgenson提出了一个有用的案例,即美学至上、技术重要性和视觉独创性的前提不是……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review: The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media, by Nathan Jurgenson
The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media , by Nathan Jurgenson. Verso, 2019. 144 pp./$19.95 (sb). Snapchat sociologist Nathan Jurgenson's new book, The Social Photo: On Photography and Social Media , is a sprawling consideration of social media as a new photographic ecosystem. Jurgenson crystallizes a working definition of the “social photo” that works against the widespread dismissal of contemporary media culture as socially invalid and inauthentic. It also delineates the replacement of photographic nostalgia with ephemerality and reconsiders documentary vision in light of the social media feed. Jurgenson states that he aims “to sensitize more than convince,” and The Social Photo does ultimately fall short of any unified theory of social media photography (11). It skirts both the social-scientific evidence and theoretical depth that could have made a more meaningful contribution to the literature, but it seeds a rethinking of mass photography and does so fashionably. Jurgenson ascribes three primary qualities to social photography, which he describes as “a type of photography made ubiquitous by networked, digital sharing” (8). It prioritizes communication over aesthetics; its images are properly understood in streams, rather than singly; and its ephemerality is key. Social photography encompasses cultural practices that surpass art history and artworld criticism, and Jurgenson makes a useful case that the presuppositions of aesthetic supremacy, technical importance, and visual originality are not productive measures of …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信