世界三大养老金制度的实际应用:丹麦、芬兰和荷兰

Svend E. Hougaarn, Lassila Jukka, Niku Mätänen, Tarmo Valkoneame, Ed Westerh
{"title":"世界三大养老金制度的实际应用:丹麦、芬兰和荷兰","authors":"Svend E. Hougaarn, Lassila Jukka, Niku Mätänen, Tarmo Valkoneame, Ed Westerh","doi":"10.3905/PA.8.2.426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In The Top Three Pension Systems: Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlandsfrom the Fall 2020 issue of TheJournal of Retirement, authors Svend E. Hougaard Jensen(of Copenhagen Business School), Jukka Lassila, Niku Määttänen, Tarmo Valkonen(all of the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy), and Ed Westerhout(of Tilburg University) analyze the three top-rated pension systems from the 2018 Mercer Global Pension Index. All three systems share common strengths: mandatory participation, a minimum guaranteed old-age income, a high income-replacement rate, and robust fiscal sustainability. They also have privatized elements (like decentralized management and market-based investing) and rely on social partners (employee and employer representatives) to help get public buy-in for policies. However, all three pension systems face similar challenges–like legitimacy issues (since social partners are elected by a shrinking number of union members) and the fact that mandatory pension contributions can preempt savings for shorter-term goals. Policymakers worldw study these pension systems to help find solutions to problems in their own systems. Policymakers in the United States can find valuable information on issues like privatizing Social Security, eligibility changes, and getting public buy-in for reforms designed to increase the system’s sustainability. TOPICS: Retirement, social security, pension funds, wealth management","PeriodicalId":179835,"journal":{"name":"Practical Application","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Applications of The Top Three Pension Systems: Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Svend E. Hougaarn, Lassila Jukka, Niku Mätänen, Tarmo Valkoneame, Ed Westerh\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/PA.8.2.426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In The Top Three Pension Systems: Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlandsfrom the Fall 2020 issue of TheJournal of Retirement, authors Svend E. Hougaard Jensen(of Copenhagen Business School), Jukka Lassila, Niku Määttänen, Tarmo Valkonen(all of the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy), and Ed Westerhout(of Tilburg University) analyze the three top-rated pension systems from the 2018 Mercer Global Pension Index. All three systems share common strengths: mandatory participation, a minimum guaranteed old-age income, a high income-replacement rate, and robust fiscal sustainability. They also have privatized elements (like decentralized management and market-based investing) and rely on social partners (employee and employer representatives) to help get public buy-in for policies. However, all three pension systems face similar challenges–like legitimacy issues (since social partners are elected by a shrinking number of union members) and the fact that mandatory pension contributions can preempt savings for shorter-term goals. Policymakers worldw study these pension systems to help find solutions to problems in their own systems. Policymakers in the United States can find valuable information on issues like privatizing Social Security, eligibility changes, and getting public buy-in for reforms designed to increase the system’s sustainability. TOPICS: Retirement, social security, pension funds, wealth management\",\"PeriodicalId\":179835,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Application\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/PA.8.2.426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Application","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/PA.8.2.426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在《退休杂志》2020年秋季版的前三大养老金体系:丹麦、芬兰和荷兰,作者send E. Hougaard Jensen(哥本哈根商学院)、Jukka Lassila、Niku Määttänen、Tarmo Valkonen(芬兰经济研究所的所有人)和Ed Westerhout(蒂尔堡大学)分析了2018年美世全球养老金指数中排名最高的三个养老金体系。这三个体系都有共同的优势:强制性参与、最低保障性养老收入、高收入替代率和强劲的财政可持续性。他们也有私有化的因素(如分散管理和基于市场的投资),并依靠社会伙伴(雇员和雇主代表)来帮助公众购买政策。然而,这三种养老金制度都面临着类似的挑战——比如合法性问题(因为社会伙伴是由数量不断减少的工会成员选举产生的),以及强制性养老金缴款可能会抢占短期目标的储蓄。政策制定者可以研究这些养老金体系,以帮助找到解决本国体系问题的办法。美国的政策制定者可以在诸如社会保障私有化、资格变更以及让公众支持旨在提高体系可持续性的改革等问题上找到有价值的信息。主题:退休、社会保障、养老基金、财富管理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical Applications of The Top Three Pension Systems: Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlands
In The Top Three Pension Systems: Denmark, Finland, and the Netherlandsfrom the Fall 2020 issue of TheJournal of Retirement, authors Svend E. Hougaard Jensen(of Copenhagen Business School), Jukka Lassila, Niku Määttänen, Tarmo Valkonen(all of the Research Institute of the Finnish Economy), and Ed Westerhout(of Tilburg University) analyze the three top-rated pension systems from the 2018 Mercer Global Pension Index. All three systems share common strengths: mandatory participation, a minimum guaranteed old-age income, a high income-replacement rate, and robust fiscal sustainability. They also have privatized elements (like decentralized management and market-based investing) and rely on social partners (employee and employer representatives) to help get public buy-in for policies. However, all three pension systems face similar challenges–like legitimacy issues (since social partners are elected by a shrinking number of union members) and the fact that mandatory pension contributions can preempt savings for shorter-term goals. Policymakers worldw study these pension systems to help find solutions to problems in their own systems. Policymakers in the United States can find valuable information on issues like privatizing Social Security, eligibility changes, and getting public buy-in for reforms designed to increase the system’s sustainability. TOPICS: Retirement, social security, pension funds, wealth management
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信