形成的系统概念和物种问题

V. Malikov, F. N. Golenishchev
{"title":"形成的系统概念和物种问题","authors":"V. Malikov, F. N. Golenishchev","doi":"10.31610/trudyzin/2009.supl.1.117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concept of formation is quite similar to epigenetic one. The biological integrity is considered as an all-round concordance between constituents of structure, functioning, reacting and development, while an organism is seen as a dynamic-steady system of integrative relations between genome and phenome based on mutual influence. Any transformation or emergent self-organization within a living system is connected with the maintenance of its steady state. The adaptive constituent of the system’s steady state concerns to its fitness, and the structural constituent – to its steady-state structure. The only difference between ontogenesis and formation is that the object of the first one is an organism, while the object of the second one is a reproducing totality of organisms, which is elementary in the frame of typology and historically conditioned within a definite space. A species is considered as typologically indivisible and historically unrepeatable variant of steady relations between genome and phenome, which canalize the diversity of their own systemically permitted transformations. The «epigenetic» constituent of divergence between species is determined by difference in relations between phenome and genome, not by change of the latter’s compound. The «products» of epigenetic speciation distinctly differ in morphology and ecology, having a lack of post-zygotic reproductive isolation. The reproductive isolation between them is caused by ecological and ethological barriers. The genetic constituent of divergence between species is incompatibility between nonconspecific genomes, which more often is revealed in a form of hybrids sterility. The prevailing of the genetic constituent of interspecific divergence is caused by allopatrie in uniform environmental conditions. In such case, the genomic divergence is accompanied by invariable relations between genome and phenome, that determines morphological and ecological uniformity of cryptic species. The divergence between panmictic species more often includes both of the constituents in different ratio. Due to its universality, the systemic approach to the problem of species is also appropriate to apomictic organisms.","PeriodicalId":344032,"journal":{"name":"Species and speciation. Analysis of new views and trends","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The systemic concept of formation and the problem of species\",\"authors\":\"V. Malikov, F. N. Golenishchev\",\"doi\":\"10.31610/trudyzin/2009.supl.1.117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This concept of formation is quite similar to epigenetic one. The biological integrity is considered as an all-round concordance between constituents of structure, functioning, reacting and development, while an organism is seen as a dynamic-steady system of integrative relations between genome and phenome based on mutual influence. Any transformation or emergent self-organization within a living system is connected with the maintenance of its steady state. The adaptive constituent of the system’s steady state concerns to its fitness, and the structural constituent – to its steady-state structure. The only difference between ontogenesis and formation is that the object of the first one is an organism, while the object of the second one is a reproducing totality of organisms, which is elementary in the frame of typology and historically conditioned within a definite space. A species is considered as typologically indivisible and historically unrepeatable variant of steady relations between genome and phenome, which canalize the diversity of their own systemically permitted transformations. The «epigenetic» constituent of divergence between species is determined by difference in relations between phenome and genome, not by change of the latter’s compound. The «products» of epigenetic speciation distinctly differ in morphology and ecology, having a lack of post-zygotic reproductive isolation. The reproductive isolation between them is caused by ecological and ethological barriers. The genetic constituent of divergence between species is incompatibility between nonconspecific genomes, which more often is revealed in a form of hybrids sterility. The prevailing of the genetic constituent of interspecific divergence is caused by allopatrie in uniform environmental conditions. In such case, the genomic divergence is accompanied by invariable relations between genome and phenome, that determines morphological and ecological uniformity of cryptic species. The divergence between panmictic species more often includes both of the constituents in different ratio. Due to its universality, the systemic approach to the problem of species is also appropriate to apomictic organisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":344032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Species and speciation. Analysis of new views and trends\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Species and speciation. Analysis of new views and trends\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31610/trudyzin/2009.supl.1.117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Species and speciation. Analysis of new views and trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31610/trudyzin/2009.supl.1.117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

这种形成的概念与表观遗传的概念非常相似。生物完整性被认为是结构、功能、反应和发育各组成部分之间的全面协调,而生物体则被视为基因组和表型之间基于相互影响的整合关系的动态稳定系统。生命系统中的任何转变或涌现的自组织都与维持其稳定状态有关。系统稳态的自适应成分关系到系统的适应度,而结构成分关系到系统的稳态结构。个体发生和形成之间的唯一区别是,前者的对象是一个有机体,而后者的对象是有机体的再生产总体,它在类型学框架中是基本的,并且在一定的空间内受到历史的限制。一个物种被认为是类型学上不可分割的,历史上不可重复的基因组和表型之间稳定关系的变体,它们通过自身系统允许的转化的多样性来实现。物种之间差异的“表观遗传”成分是由表型和基因组之间关系的差异决定的,而不是由后者化合物的变化决定的。表观遗传物种形成的“产物”在形态和生态学上明显不同,缺乏合子后的生殖隔离。它们之间的生殖隔离是由生态障碍和行为障碍造成的。物种间分化的遗传成分是非同种基因组间的不亲和性,这种不亲和性更多地表现为杂交不育的形式。种间分化的遗传成分的盛行是由同种异种在统一的环境条件下造成的。在这种情况下,基因组分化伴随着基因组和表型之间的不变关系,这决定了隐种形态和生态的一致性。泛生种间的分化更多地包括这两种成分的不同比例。由于其普遍性,物种问题的系统方法也适用于无分裂生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The systemic concept of formation and the problem of species
This concept of formation is quite similar to epigenetic one. The biological integrity is considered as an all-round concordance between constituents of structure, functioning, reacting and development, while an organism is seen as a dynamic-steady system of integrative relations between genome and phenome based on mutual influence. Any transformation or emergent self-organization within a living system is connected with the maintenance of its steady state. The adaptive constituent of the system’s steady state concerns to its fitness, and the structural constituent – to its steady-state structure. The only difference between ontogenesis and formation is that the object of the first one is an organism, while the object of the second one is a reproducing totality of organisms, which is elementary in the frame of typology and historically conditioned within a definite space. A species is considered as typologically indivisible and historically unrepeatable variant of steady relations between genome and phenome, which canalize the diversity of their own systemically permitted transformations. The «epigenetic» constituent of divergence between species is determined by difference in relations between phenome and genome, not by change of the latter’s compound. The «products» of epigenetic speciation distinctly differ in morphology and ecology, having a lack of post-zygotic reproductive isolation. The reproductive isolation between them is caused by ecological and ethological barriers. The genetic constituent of divergence between species is incompatibility between nonconspecific genomes, which more often is revealed in a form of hybrids sterility. The prevailing of the genetic constituent of interspecific divergence is caused by allopatrie in uniform environmental conditions. In such case, the genomic divergence is accompanied by invariable relations between genome and phenome, that determines morphological and ecological uniformity of cryptic species. The divergence between panmictic species more often includes both of the constituents in different ratio. Due to its universality, the systemic approach to the problem of species is also appropriate to apomictic organisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信