运用messick效度法和rasch模型在科学推理测试项目上构建效度分析

Y. Arfiani, P. Susongko, M. Kusuma
{"title":"运用messick效度法和rasch模型在科学推理测试项目上构建效度分析","authors":"Y. Arfiani, P. Susongko, M. Kusuma","doi":"10.21043/thabiea.v6i1.18918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Scientific Reasoning Test is basically inseparable from the three aspects of the Scientific Literacy Test. This study aims to test the feasibility of the instrument for measuring scientific reasoning in terms of content validity, psychometrics, and constructs. The form of this research is Research and Development (Research and Development). In the instrument development research design using the ADDIE procedural model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). This test was given to 194 high school students in Math and Natural Sciences class XII in the 2022-2023 academic year. Analysis of the validity of the test using Rasch modeling. The type of validity applied is Messick's validity which includes content validity, psychometric validity and construct validity consisting of content aspects, substantive aspects, structural aspects and external aspects. The results show that of the 50 questions made, there are 25 items that are feasible to use as measumenet in scientific reasoning test. This research contributes to the improvement of assessment practice in science education.","PeriodicalId":308683,"journal":{"name":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct validity analysis with messick validity approach and rasch model application on scientific reasoning test items\",\"authors\":\"Y. Arfiani, P. Susongko, M. Kusuma\",\"doi\":\"10.21043/thabiea.v6i1.18918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Scientific Reasoning Test is basically inseparable from the three aspects of the Scientific Literacy Test. This study aims to test the feasibility of the instrument for measuring scientific reasoning in terms of content validity, psychometrics, and constructs. The form of this research is Research and Development (Research and Development). In the instrument development research design using the ADDIE procedural model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). This test was given to 194 high school students in Math and Natural Sciences class XII in the 2022-2023 academic year. Analysis of the validity of the test using Rasch modeling. The type of validity applied is Messick's validity which includes content validity, psychometric validity and construct validity consisting of content aspects, substantive aspects, structural aspects and external aspects. The results show that of the 50 questions made, there are 25 items that are feasible to use as measumenet in scientific reasoning test. This research contributes to the improvement of assessment practice in science education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING\",\"volume\":\"134 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v6i1.18918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THABIEA : JOURNAL OF NATURAL SCIENCE TEACHING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v6i1.18918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学推理测试与科学素养测试的三个方面基本是分不开的。本研究旨在从内容效度、心理测量学和构念三个方面检验科学推理测量工具的可行性。这项研究的形式是研究与发展(research and Development)。在仪器开发研究设计中采用ADDIE程序模型(分析、设计、开发、实施、评估)。这个测试是在2022-2023学年对194名高中数学和自然科学班的学生进行的。使用Rasch模型分析测试的有效性。所采用的效度类型为梅西克效度,包括内容效度、心理测量效度和由内容、实体、结构和外部构成的构念效度。结果表明,在50个问题中,有25个项目是可行的,可以作为科学推理测试的测量。本研究有助于科学教育评估实践的完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Construct validity analysis with messick validity approach and rasch model application on scientific reasoning test items
The Scientific Reasoning Test is basically inseparable from the three aspects of the Scientific Literacy Test. This study aims to test the feasibility of the instrument for measuring scientific reasoning in terms of content validity, psychometrics, and constructs. The form of this research is Research and Development (Research and Development). In the instrument development research design using the ADDIE procedural model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). This test was given to 194 high school students in Math and Natural Sciences class XII in the 2022-2023 academic year. Analysis of the validity of the test using Rasch modeling. The type of validity applied is Messick's validity which includes content validity, psychometric validity and construct validity consisting of content aspects, substantive aspects, structural aspects and external aspects. The results show that of the 50 questions made, there are 25 items that are feasible to use as measumenet in scientific reasoning test. This research contributes to the improvement of assessment practice in science education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信