2019年全日制和普通幼儿园儿童粗动作发展、语言和亲社会行为的差异

Isyos Sari Sembiring
{"title":"2019年全日制和普通幼儿园儿童粗动作发展、语言和亲社会行为的差异","authors":"Isyos Sari Sembiring","doi":"10.55541/emj.v3i2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The background of this research is Targeted SDGs of quality education by 2030 ensure that all children have access to quality early development, care, and pre-primary education.The purpose of this study is to find out the differences in Roughmotoric, language and prosocial behavior development in children undergoing kindergarten and regular daytime kindergarten learning.Types and designs in this study use Mixed Methods namely Sequential Explanatory Designs. Population in Quantitative Research children aged 4-6 years who attend learning in kindergarten and regular programs, and qualitative research populations School Leaders, Teachers/Teaching Staff, parents. Quantitative research sample is 34 respondents in Full Day program Kindergarten and 38 people in Regular program and for Qualitative research are School Leaders, Teachers / Teaching Staff, parents, sample technique in Quantitative research is Total Sampling, and for Qualitative research is proportional simple random sampling. Examination using KPSP and prosocial behavior observation sheets in quantitative research, and in qualitative research using interview guides and focus group discussion guides. Data analysis in quantitative research uses Mann Whitney and qualitative research uses data reduction analysis techniques, data display and conclusion drawing / verification.The results of quantitative research on bivariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between children undergoing full-day and regular program kindergarten.  On p-value motor development was 0.008 (p <0.05), language p-value was 0.006 (p <0.05) and prosocial behavior p-value was 0.009 (p <0.05). Qualitative research results are not found any obstacles and efforts have been made to improve the quality of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior, so that it has benefited and achieved expectations of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior in children undergoing kindergarten full and regular programs.The conclusion of this study is Roughmotoric, language, and prosocial behavior development. in children who undergo full-day kindergarten program is better than regular program kindergarten.Keywords: Language development, rough motor development, prosocial behavior,kindergarten","PeriodicalId":262873,"journal":{"name":"Excellent Midwifery Journal","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DIFFERENCES IN ROUGH MOTORIC DEVELOPMENT, LANGUAGE AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN CHILDREN WHO KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM FULL DAY AND REGULAR IN 2019\",\"authors\":\"Isyos Sari Sembiring\",\"doi\":\"10.55541/emj.v3i2.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The background of this research is Targeted SDGs of quality education by 2030 ensure that all children have access to quality early development, care, and pre-primary education.The purpose of this study is to find out the differences in Roughmotoric, language and prosocial behavior development in children undergoing kindergarten and regular daytime kindergarten learning.Types and designs in this study use Mixed Methods namely Sequential Explanatory Designs. Population in Quantitative Research children aged 4-6 years who attend learning in kindergarten and regular programs, and qualitative research populations School Leaders, Teachers/Teaching Staff, parents. Quantitative research sample is 34 respondents in Full Day program Kindergarten and 38 people in Regular program and for Qualitative research are School Leaders, Teachers / Teaching Staff, parents, sample technique in Quantitative research is Total Sampling, and for Qualitative research is proportional simple random sampling. Examination using KPSP and prosocial behavior observation sheets in quantitative research, and in qualitative research using interview guides and focus group discussion guides. Data analysis in quantitative research uses Mann Whitney and qualitative research uses data reduction analysis techniques, data display and conclusion drawing / verification.The results of quantitative research on bivariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between children undergoing full-day and regular program kindergarten.  On p-value motor development was 0.008 (p <0.05), language p-value was 0.006 (p <0.05) and prosocial behavior p-value was 0.009 (p <0.05). Qualitative research results are not found any obstacles and efforts have been made to improve the quality of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior, so that it has benefited and achieved expectations of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior in children undergoing kindergarten full and regular programs.The conclusion of this study is Roughmotoric, language, and prosocial behavior development. in children who undergo full-day kindergarten program is better than regular program kindergarten.Keywords: Language development, rough motor development, prosocial behavior,kindergarten\",\"PeriodicalId\":262873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Excellent Midwifery Journal\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Excellent Midwifery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55541/emj.v3i2.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Excellent Midwifery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55541/emj.v3i2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的背景是到2030年实现优质教育的可持续发展目标,确保所有儿童都能获得优质的早期发展、护理和学前教育。本研究的目的是探讨幼儿园儿童与普通幼儿园儿童在粗野动作、语言和亲社会行为发展方面的差异。本研究的类型和设计采用混合方法,即顺序解释设计。定量研究人群4-6岁参加幼儿园和常规课程学习的儿童,定性研究人群学校领导,教师/教学人员,家长。定量研究样本为全日制幼儿园34人,普通幼儿园38人,定性研究样本为学校领导、教师/教学人员、家长,定量研究的样本技术为总抽样,定性研究的样本技术为比例简单随机抽样。在定量研究中使用KPSP和亲社会行为观察表进行检查,在定性研究中使用访谈指南和焦点小组讨论指南。定量研究中的数据分析使用曼·惠特尼,定性研究使用数据简化分析技术,数据显示和结论绘制/验证。定量研究的双变量分析结果显示,全日制和常规项目幼儿园的儿童存在显著差异。运动发展p值为0.008 (p <0.05),语言p值为0.006 (p <0.05),亲社会行为p值为0.009 (p <0.05)。定性研究结果没有发现任何障碍,并努力提高粗糙动作发展、语言和亲社会行为的质量,使幼儿园全日制和常规课程儿童的粗糙动作发展、语言和亲社会行为受益并达到预期。本研究的结论是粗野运动、语言和亲社会行为的发展。在接受全日制幼儿园计划的儿童中,比常规计划的幼儿园要好。关键词:语言发展,粗糙动作发展,亲社会行为,幼儿园
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DIFFERENCES IN ROUGH MOTORIC DEVELOPMENT, LANGUAGE AND PROSOCIAL BEHAVIOR IN CHILDREN WHO KINDERGARTEN PROGRAM FULL DAY AND REGULAR IN 2019
The background of this research is Targeted SDGs of quality education by 2030 ensure that all children have access to quality early development, care, and pre-primary education.The purpose of this study is to find out the differences in Roughmotoric, language and prosocial behavior development in children undergoing kindergarten and regular daytime kindergarten learning.Types and designs in this study use Mixed Methods namely Sequential Explanatory Designs. Population in Quantitative Research children aged 4-6 years who attend learning in kindergarten and regular programs, and qualitative research populations School Leaders, Teachers/Teaching Staff, parents. Quantitative research sample is 34 respondents in Full Day program Kindergarten and 38 people in Regular program and for Qualitative research are School Leaders, Teachers / Teaching Staff, parents, sample technique in Quantitative research is Total Sampling, and for Qualitative research is proportional simple random sampling. Examination using KPSP and prosocial behavior observation sheets in quantitative research, and in qualitative research using interview guides and focus group discussion guides. Data analysis in quantitative research uses Mann Whitney and qualitative research uses data reduction analysis techniques, data display and conclusion drawing / verification.The results of quantitative research on bivariate analysis showed that there were significant differences between children undergoing full-day and regular program kindergarten.  On p-value motor development was 0.008 (p <0.05), language p-value was 0.006 (p <0.05) and prosocial behavior p-value was 0.009 (p <0.05). Qualitative research results are not found any obstacles and efforts have been made to improve the quality of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior, so that it has benefited and achieved expectations of Roughmotoric development, language and prosocial behavior in children undergoing kindergarten full and regular programs.The conclusion of this study is Roughmotoric, language, and prosocial behavior development. in children who undergo full-day kindergarten program is better than regular program kindergarten.Keywords: Language development, rough motor development, prosocial behavior,kindergarten
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信