通过法院判决完成欧盟措施:以欧洲逮捕令为例

Yumiko Nakanishi
{"title":"通过法院判决完成欧盟措施:以欧洲逮捕令为例","authors":"Yumiko Nakanishi","doi":"10.15057/28305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) was adopted as an EU measure in 2002. With this Framework Decision, the system of the EAW was introduced in European Countries. The Melloni Case of the CJEU had an impact on EU Member States. After that, the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) had the opportunity to treat the Melloni decision on the EAW. The GFCC checked it, based on the identity review, and opened a way of derogating the measure. The decision of the GFCC is called “Solange III.” The CJEU reacted to the CFCCʼs decision and accepted it to some extent. Then, GFCC treated the CJEUʼs decision on the EAW again. Those decisions of the GFCC and CJEU contributed to complementing the EAW system through dialogue between them. This article aims to show the process of completion of an EU measure through court decisions, using the framework decision on the EAW as an example.","PeriodicalId":208983,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPLETION OF EU MEASURES THROUGH COURT DECISIONS: THE EXAMPLE OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT\",\"authors\":\"Yumiko Nakanishi\",\"doi\":\"10.15057/28305\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) was adopted as an EU measure in 2002. With this Framework Decision, the system of the EAW was introduced in European Countries. The Melloni Case of the CJEU had an impact on EU Member States. After that, the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) had the opportunity to treat the Melloni decision on the EAW. The GFCC checked it, based on the identity review, and opened a way of derogating the measure. The decision of the GFCC is called “Solange III.” The CJEU reacted to the CFCCʼs decision and accepted it to some extent. Then, GFCC treated the CJEUʼs decision on the EAW again. Those decisions of the GFCC and CJEU contributed to complementing the EAW system through dialogue between them. This article aims to show the process of completion of an EU measure through court decisions, using the framework decision on the EAW as an example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15057/28305\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/28305","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2002年,欧盟通过了关于欧洲逮捕令(EAW)的理事会框架决定。有了这一框架决定,欧洲国家引进了EAW制度。欧洲法院的Melloni案对欧盟成员国产生了影响。此后,德国联邦宪法法院(GFCC)有机会审理Melloni关于EAW的决定。GFCC根据身份审查对其进行了检查,并开辟了一种贬损该措施的方式。GFCC的决定被称为“索朗热III”。欧盟法院对CFCC的决定作出了反应,并在一定程度上接受了CFCC的决定。然后,GFCC再次处理了欧盟法院关于EAW的决定。GFCC和欧洲法院的这些决定有助于通过它们之间的对话补充EAW系统。本文旨在展示通过法院判决完成欧盟措施的过程,并以EAW的框架判决为例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPLETION OF EU MEASURES THROUGH COURT DECISIONS: THE EXAMPLE OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT
The Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant (EAW) was adopted as an EU measure in 2002. With this Framework Decision, the system of the EAW was introduced in European Countries. The Melloni Case of the CJEU had an impact on EU Member States. After that, the German Federal Constitutional Court (GFCC) had the opportunity to treat the Melloni decision on the EAW. The GFCC checked it, based on the identity review, and opened a way of derogating the measure. The decision of the GFCC is called “Solange III.” The CJEU reacted to the CFCCʼs decision and accepted it to some extent. Then, GFCC treated the CJEUʼs decision on the EAW again. Those decisions of the GFCC and CJEU contributed to complementing the EAW system through dialogue between them. This article aims to show the process of completion of an EU measure through court decisions, using the framework decision on the EAW as an example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信