股权激励、盈余管理和公司治理:使用英国面板数据的经验证据

M. A. Shabeeb Ali, Hazem Ramadan Ismael, A. H. Ahmed
{"title":"股权激励、盈余管理和公司治理:使用英国面板数据的经验证据","authors":"M. A. Shabeeb Ali, Hazem Ramadan Ismael, A. H. Ahmed","doi":"10.22495/cocv17i2art10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"JEL Classification: G340, M210, M410, M420, M480 DOI: 10.22495/cocv17i2art10 Using a UK panel data set drawn from 1675 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) year observations and 1540 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) year observations, we examine the relationship between CEO and CFO equity incentives and earnings management. In addition, we examine the moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. We use multivariate regression models to test our hypotheses. We find that CEO equity incentives are related to higher absolute and income increasing earnings management. These results support the managerial power theory argument that CEOs exploit equitylinked compensation to obtain more personal benefits without causing public anger. Contrary to CEO equity incentives, we could not find any significant relationship between CFO equity incentives and any of the earnings management proxies. In addition, we find that corporate governance quality (measured by individual mechanisms and overall index) has no effect on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. This result indicates that whereas some corporate governance mechanisms can reduce earnings management in general, they do not affect wealth driven incentives to manipulate accruals. In total, results question the effectiveness of the corporate governance system in mitigating opportunistic behavior motivated by executives’ compensation structures.","PeriodicalId":438501,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Ownership and Control","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity incentives, earnings management and corporate governance: Empirical evidence using UK panel data\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Shabeeb Ali, Hazem Ramadan Ismael, A. H. Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.22495/cocv17i2art10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"JEL Classification: G340, M210, M410, M420, M480 DOI: 10.22495/cocv17i2art10 Using a UK panel data set drawn from 1675 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) year observations and 1540 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) year observations, we examine the relationship between CEO and CFO equity incentives and earnings management. In addition, we examine the moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. We use multivariate regression models to test our hypotheses. We find that CEO equity incentives are related to higher absolute and income increasing earnings management. These results support the managerial power theory argument that CEOs exploit equitylinked compensation to obtain more personal benefits without causing public anger. Contrary to CEO equity incentives, we could not find any significant relationship between CFO equity incentives and any of the earnings management proxies. In addition, we find that corporate governance quality (measured by individual mechanisms and overall index) has no effect on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. This result indicates that whereas some corporate governance mechanisms can reduce earnings management in general, they do not affect wealth driven incentives to manipulate accruals. In total, results question the effectiveness of the corporate governance system in mitigating opportunistic behavior motivated by executives’ compensation structures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":438501,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Ownership and Control\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Ownership and Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Ownership and Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv17i2art10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

JEL分类:G340, M210, M410, M420, M480 DOI: 10.22495/cocv17i2art10使用来自1675名首席执行官(CEO)年度观察和1540名首席财务官(CFO)年度观察的英国面板数据集,我们研究了CEO和CFO股权激励与盈余管理之间的关系。此外,我们还考察了公司治理机制对高管股权激励与盈余管理关系的调节作用。我们使用多元回归模型来检验我们的假设。我们发现CEO股权激励与更高的绝对盈余管理和收入增加有关。这些结果支持了管理权力理论的观点,即ceo利用与股权挂钩的薪酬,在不引起公众愤怒的情况下获得更多的个人利益。与CEO股权激励相反,我们没有发现CFO股权激励与任何盈余管理代理之间存在显著关系。此外,我们发现公司治理质量(以个体机制和整体指标衡量)对高管股权激励与盈余管理之间的关系没有影响。这一结果表明,尽管某些公司治理机制总体上可以减少盈余管理,但它们并不影响操纵应计利润的财富驱动激励。总的来说,研究结果质疑了公司治理体系在减少由高管薪酬结构驱动的机会主义行为方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equity incentives, earnings management and corporate governance: Empirical evidence using UK panel data
JEL Classification: G340, M210, M410, M420, M480 DOI: 10.22495/cocv17i2art10 Using a UK panel data set drawn from 1675 Chief Executive Officer (CEO) year observations and 1540 Chief Financial Officer (CFO) year observations, we examine the relationship between CEO and CFO equity incentives and earnings management. In addition, we examine the moderation effect of corporate governance mechanisms on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. We use multivariate regression models to test our hypotheses. We find that CEO equity incentives are related to higher absolute and income increasing earnings management. These results support the managerial power theory argument that CEOs exploit equitylinked compensation to obtain more personal benefits without causing public anger. Contrary to CEO equity incentives, we could not find any significant relationship between CFO equity incentives and any of the earnings management proxies. In addition, we find that corporate governance quality (measured by individual mechanisms and overall index) has no effect on the relationship between executives’ equity incentives and earnings management. This result indicates that whereas some corporate governance mechanisms can reduce earnings management in general, they do not affect wealth driven incentives to manipulate accruals. In total, results question the effectiveness of the corporate governance system in mitigating opportunistic behavior motivated by executives’ compensation structures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信