{"title":"并行稀疏Cholesky分解的评价","authors":"W.-Y. Lin, C.-L. Chen","doi":"10.1109/ICPADS.1994.590074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though many parallel implementations of sparse Cholesky factorization with the experimental results accompanied have been proposed, it seems hard to evaluate the performance of these factorization methods theoretically because of the irregular structure of sparse matrices. This paper is an attempt to such research. On the basis of the criteria of parallel computation and communication time, we successfully evaluate four widely adopted Cholesky factorization methods, including column-Cholesky, row-Cholesky, submatrix-Cholesky and multifrontal. The results show that the multifrontal method is superior to the others.","PeriodicalId":154429,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1994 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On evaluating parallel sparse Cholesky factorizations\",\"authors\":\"W.-Y. Lin, C.-L. Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICPADS.1994.590074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though many parallel implementations of sparse Cholesky factorization with the experimental results accompanied have been proposed, it seems hard to evaluate the performance of these factorization methods theoretically because of the irregular structure of sparse matrices. This paper is an attempt to such research. On the basis of the criteria of parallel computation and communication time, we successfully evaluate four widely adopted Cholesky factorization methods, including column-Cholesky, row-Cholesky, submatrix-Cholesky and multifrontal. The results show that the multifrontal method is superior to the others.\",\"PeriodicalId\":154429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of 1994 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1994-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of 1994 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS.1994.590074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1994 International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPADS.1994.590074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
On evaluating parallel sparse Cholesky factorizations
Though many parallel implementations of sparse Cholesky factorization with the experimental results accompanied have been proposed, it seems hard to evaluate the performance of these factorization methods theoretically because of the irregular structure of sparse matrices. This paper is an attempt to such research. On the basis of the criteria of parallel computation and communication time, we successfully evaluate four widely adopted Cholesky factorization methods, including column-Cholesky, row-Cholesky, submatrix-Cholesky and multifrontal. The results show that the multifrontal method is superior to the others.