{"title":"不同SDN拓扑下POX和Ryu的性能分析","authors":"Jehad Ali, Seungwoon Lee, B. Roh","doi":"10.1145/3209914.3209931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the performance comparison of two python-based Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers i.e. POX and Ryu under different network topologies such as Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, Data Center Networks (DCN) and Software-Defined naval networks which use satellite communication systems (SATCOM) i.e. SDN-SAT [1]. Experimental results, validated through Mininet has clearly indicated that Ryu has superior performance i.e. A TCP throughput increase of 25.56%, 282.54%, 44.85%, 19.88%, 45.45% and latency decrease of 93.48%, 99.96%, 99.90%, 97.08%, 99.33% in single, linear, tree, dumbbell and DCN topologies respectively. Similarly, in SDN-SAT topology Ryu has 0.21% increase in TCP throughput and 34.62% decrease in latency as compared to POX controller.","PeriodicalId":174382,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis of POX and Ryu with Different SDN Topologies\",\"authors\":\"Jehad Ali, Seungwoon Lee, B. Roh\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3209914.3209931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the performance comparison of two python-based Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers i.e. POX and Ryu under different network topologies such as Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, Data Center Networks (DCN) and Software-Defined naval networks which use satellite communication systems (SATCOM) i.e. SDN-SAT [1]. Experimental results, validated through Mininet has clearly indicated that Ryu has superior performance i.e. A TCP throughput increase of 25.56%, 282.54%, 44.85%, 19.88%, 45.45% and latency decrease of 93.48%, 99.96%, 99.90%, 97.08%, 99.33% in single, linear, tree, dumbbell and DCN topologies respectively. Similarly, in SDN-SAT topology Ryu has 0.21% increase in TCP throughput and 34.62% decrease in latency as compared to POX controller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":174382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3209914.3209931\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information Science and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3209914.3209931","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Analysis of POX and Ryu with Different SDN Topologies
This paper deals with the performance comparison of two python-based Software Defined Network (SDN) controllers i.e. POX and Ryu under different network topologies such as Single, Linear, Tree, Dumbbell, Data Center Networks (DCN) and Software-Defined naval networks which use satellite communication systems (SATCOM) i.e. SDN-SAT [1]. Experimental results, validated through Mininet has clearly indicated that Ryu has superior performance i.e. A TCP throughput increase of 25.56%, 282.54%, 44.85%, 19.88%, 45.45% and latency decrease of 93.48%, 99.96%, 99.90%, 97.08%, 99.33% in single, linear, tree, dumbbell and DCN topologies respectively. Similarly, in SDN-SAT topology Ryu has 0.21% increase in TCP throughput and 34.62% decrease in latency as compared to POX controller.