股份公司法争议的可仲裁性

Cem Veziroğlu
{"title":"股份公司法争议的可仲裁性","authors":"Cem Veziroğlu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3046152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While only contractual claims may be requested in arbitral proceedings carried out in accordance with shareholders’ agreements (“SHA”), it is not always possible to prevent claims peculiar to corporate law, such as invalidity of general assembly and board resolutions, action for dissolution and directors’ liability, from being asserted in local courts. Hence, contradicting judgments may be given in these parallel proceedings. For this reason, the rights and obligations stipulated in the SHA are carried into the articles of association (“AoA”) in order to make these mechanisms applicable on corporate level as well. However, the validity of a statutory arbitration clause in the AoA entails a series of issues both in terms of arbitration law and corporate law. This paper addresses the validity of an arbitration clause in the AoA of a joint stock company in respect of arbitrability under Turkish law, and it compares it with German and Swiss jurisdictions in order to propose practical solutions. Our proposal are: (i) the availability and conditions to stipulate an arbitration clause in the AoA should be clearly regulated, (ii) supplementary rules of arbitration that take problems specific to corporate law disputes into consideration should be adopted and (iii) a model arbitration clause referring to the above-mentioned rules should be prepared and published by ISTAC.","PeriodicalId":171263,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitrability of Disputes Arising from Joint Stock Company Law\",\"authors\":\"Cem Veziroğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3046152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While only contractual claims may be requested in arbitral proceedings carried out in accordance with shareholders’ agreements (“SHA”), it is not always possible to prevent claims peculiar to corporate law, such as invalidity of general assembly and board resolutions, action for dissolution and directors’ liability, from being asserted in local courts. Hence, contradicting judgments may be given in these parallel proceedings. For this reason, the rights and obligations stipulated in the SHA are carried into the articles of association (“AoA”) in order to make these mechanisms applicable on corporate level as well. However, the validity of a statutory arbitration clause in the AoA entails a series of issues both in terms of arbitration law and corporate law. This paper addresses the validity of an arbitration clause in the AoA of a joint stock company in respect of arbitrability under Turkish law, and it compares it with German and Swiss jurisdictions in order to propose practical solutions. Our proposal are: (i) the availability and conditions to stipulate an arbitration clause in the AoA should be clearly regulated, (ii) supplementary rules of arbitration that take problems specific to corporate law disputes into consideration should be adopted and (iii) a model arbitration clause referring to the above-mentioned rules should be prepared and published by ISTAC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Governance: Arrangements & Laws eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3046152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然在根据股东协议进行的仲裁程序中只能要求合同索赔,但并不总是能够防止公司法特有的索赔,例如大会和董事会决议的无效、解散行动和董事责任,在当地法院提出。因此,在这些平行程序中可能会作出相互矛盾的判决。因此,SHA规定的权利和义务被纳入公司章程(“AoA”),以使这些机制也适用于公司层面。然而,仲裁协议中法定仲裁条款的效力涉及一系列仲裁法和公司法方面的问题。本文探讨了土耳其法律下股份公司仲裁协议中仲裁条款的有效性,并将其与德国和瑞士司法管辖区进行了比较,以提出切实可行的解决方案。我们的建议是:(i)明确规定AoA中规定仲裁条款的可用性和条件;(ii)采用考虑公司法纠纷具体问题的仲裁补充规则;(iii)由ISTAC参照上述规则制定和发布示范仲裁条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbitrability of Disputes Arising from Joint Stock Company Law
While only contractual claims may be requested in arbitral proceedings carried out in accordance with shareholders’ agreements (“SHA”), it is not always possible to prevent claims peculiar to corporate law, such as invalidity of general assembly and board resolutions, action for dissolution and directors’ liability, from being asserted in local courts. Hence, contradicting judgments may be given in these parallel proceedings. For this reason, the rights and obligations stipulated in the SHA are carried into the articles of association (“AoA”) in order to make these mechanisms applicable on corporate level as well. However, the validity of a statutory arbitration clause in the AoA entails a series of issues both in terms of arbitration law and corporate law. This paper addresses the validity of an arbitration clause in the AoA of a joint stock company in respect of arbitrability under Turkish law, and it compares it with German and Swiss jurisdictions in order to propose practical solutions. Our proposal are: (i) the availability and conditions to stipulate an arbitration clause in the AoA should be clearly regulated, (ii) supplementary rules of arbitration that take problems specific to corporate law disputes into consideration should be adopted and (iii) a model arbitration clause referring to the above-mentioned rules should be prepared and published by ISTAC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信