{"title":"特殊函数的自动定理证明:下一阶段","authors":"Lawrence Charles Paulson","doi":"10.1145/2631948.2631950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated theorem proving, in a nutshell, is the combination of symbolic logic with syntactic algorithms. A formal proof calculus is chosen with two criteria in mind: expressiveness and ease of automation. These desiderata pull in opposite directions: Boolean logic and linear arithmetic are decidable, so the answers to all questions can simply be calculated, but these theories are not very expressive. At the other extreme, a dependent type theory such as the calculus of constructions used in Coq [6] is highly expressive and flexible, but complicates automation; even basic rewriting is difficult. Higher-order logic is often seen as a suitable compromise, expressive enough to reason directly about sets and functions, while still admitting substantial automation (especially in the case of Isabelle [18]).","PeriodicalId":308716,"journal":{"name":"Symbolic-Numeric Computation","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Automated theorem proving for special functions: the next phase\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence Charles Paulson\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2631948.2631950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Automated theorem proving, in a nutshell, is the combination of symbolic logic with syntactic algorithms. A formal proof calculus is chosen with two criteria in mind: expressiveness and ease of automation. These desiderata pull in opposite directions: Boolean logic and linear arithmetic are decidable, so the answers to all questions can simply be calculated, but these theories are not very expressive. At the other extreme, a dependent type theory such as the calculus of constructions used in Coq [6] is highly expressive and flexible, but complicates automation; even basic rewriting is difficult. Higher-order logic is often seen as a suitable compromise, expressive enough to reason directly about sets and functions, while still admitting substantial automation (especially in the case of Isabelle [18]).\",\"PeriodicalId\":308716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Symbolic-Numeric Computation\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Symbolic-Numeric Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2631948.2631950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Symbolic-Numeric Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2631948.2631950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Automated theorem proving for special functions: the next phase
Automated theorem proving, in a nutshell, is the combination of symbolic logic with syntactic algorithms. A formal proof calculus is chosen with two criteria in mind: expressiveness and ease of automation. These desiderata pull in opposite directions: Boolean logic and linear arithmetic are decidable, so the answers to all questions can simply be calculated, but these theories are not very expressive. At the other extreme, a dependent type theory such as the calculus of constructions used in Coq [6] is highly expressive and flexible, but complicates automation; even basic rewriting is difficult. Higher-order logic is often seen as a suitable compromise, expressive enough to reason directly about sets and functions, while still admitting substantial automation (especially in the case of Isabelle [18]).