巴西的政治腐败与发展:腐败的随机审计会增加经济活动吗?

Jamie Bologna Pavlik, Kaitlyn R. Harger
{"title":"巴西的政治腐败与发展:腐败的随机审计会增加经济活动吗?","authors":"Jamie Bologna Pavlik, Kaitlyn R. Harger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3277998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The government of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva implemented a random audits program aimed at curbing municipal corruption in 2003. Recent literature found evidence that these audits successfully reduced corruption (Avis, Ferraz, and Finan 2018) and improved firm performance (Colonnelli and Prem 2017). These latter findings are obtained using survey data concerning formal activity alone. However, many formal firms operate partially “off the books”. Further, these audits likely affect citizen tolerance for corruption in general potentially affecting other facets of governance including informality enforcement. This has its own consequence on economic growth. Thus, an analysis including all forms of economic activity is warranted. We utilize difference-in-difference and matching techniques in conjunction with broad measures of total economic activity to test if audited municipalities improved relative to their non-audited counterparts. We find evidence of a slight decline in subsequent economic activity; we find no evidence of any benefit. A preliminary analysis suggests that this decline may stem from increased informality enforcement.","PeriodicalId":132360,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Political Corruption and Development in Brazil: Do Random Audits of Corruption Increase Economic Activity?\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Bologna Pavlik, Kaitlyn R. Harger\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3277998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The government of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva implemented a random audits program aimed at curbing municipal corruption in 2003. Recent literature found evidence that these audits successfully reduced corruption (Avis, Ferraz, and Finan 2018) and improved firm performance (Colonnelli and Prem 2017). These latter findings are obtained using survey data concerning formal activity alone. However, many formal firms operate partially “off the books”. Further, these audits likely affect citizen tolerance for corruption in general potentially affecting other facets of governance including informality enforcement. This has its own consequence on economic growth. Thus, an analysis including all forms of economic activity is warranted. We utilize difference-in-difference and matching techniques in conjunction with broad measures of total economic activity to test if audited municipalities improved relative to their non-audited counterparts. We find evidence of a slight decline in subsequent economic activity; we find no evidence of any benefit. A preliminary analysis suggests that this decline may stem from increased informality enforcement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":132360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Political Economy: National\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Political Economy: National\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3277998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

2003年,路易斯·伊纳西奥·卢拉·达席尔瓦政府实施了一项旨在遏制市政腐败的随机审计计划。最近的文献发现,有证据表明这些审计成功地减少了腐败(Avis, Ferraz, and Finan, 2018)并改善了公司绩效(Colonnelli and Prem, 2017)。后一项发现是仅使用有关正式活动的调查数据得出的。然而,许多正规公司部分地“不入账”。此外,这些审计可能会影响公民对腐败的容忍度,进而影响治理的其他方面,包括非正式执法。这对经济增长有其自身的影响。因此,有必要对所有形式的经济活动进行分析。我们利用差中之差和匹配技术与总体经济活动的广泛措施相结合,以测试经审计的市政当局是否相对于未经审计的同行有所改善。我们发现了随后经济活动略有下降的证据;我们没有发现任何有益的证据。初步分析表明,这种下降可能源于非正式执法的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Political Corruption and Development in Brazil: Do Random Audits of Corruption Increase Economic Activity?
The government of Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva implemented a random audits program aimed at curbing municipal corruption in 2003. Recent literature found evidence that these audits successfully reduced corruption (Avis, Ferraz, and Finan 2018) and improved firm performance (Colonnelli and Prem 2017). These latter findings are obtained using survey data concerning formal activity alone. However, many formal firms operate partially “off the books”. Further, these audits likely affect citizen tolerance for corruption in general potentially affecting other facets of governance including informality enforcement. This has its own consequence on economic growth. Thus, an analysis including all forms of economic activity is warranted. We utilize difference-in-difference and matching techniques in conjunction with broad measures of total economic activity to test if audited municipalities improved relative to their non-audited counterparts. We find evidence of a slight decline in subsequent economic activity; we find no evidence of any benefit. A preliminary analysis suggests that this decline may stem from increased informality enforcement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信