Alva Taylor, L. Foster-Johnson, Richard A. Harriman
{"title":"企业内部从创新活动中学习:管理者的角色、工作环境和所处的组织注意力","authors":"Alva Taylor, L. Foster-Johnson, Richard A. Harriman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1306788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we examine the organizational learning that occurs as a result of the innovative activity of new product development. We argue that learning from the new knowledge generated by the innovative activity is influenced by the cognitive context and work conditions in the organization, and can be aided or impeded by factors that affect the attention of individuals in the organization. We use differences in the organizational context - whether the work environment is a knowledge-rich or a knowledge-sparse environment - to show that factors such as manager involvement and perceived competition play an important part in determining whether attention to new knowledge results in greater or lesser learning. We test our hypotheses using empirical data from multiple new product development groups in a multi-division global consumer goods company. Our findings show that the cognitive influences affect the level of learning, and this learning differs based on the contextual situation created by the level of new knowledge. We also show that management oversight at the middle-manager level separates dynamic learning projects from those that are relatively inert. It is proactive middle managers who are able to help an organization acquire new knowledge and renew its innovative resources. These findings have implications for theories of innovation, competition, organizational learning, and managerial decision making.","PeriodicalId":172039,"journal":{"name":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-Firm Learning from Innovative Activity: The Role of Managers, Work Context and Situated Organizational Attention\",\"authors\":\"Alva Taylor, L. Foster-Johnson, Richard A. Harriman\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1306788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper we examine the organizational learning that occurs as a result of the innovative activity of new product development. We argue that learning from the new knowledge generated by the innovative activity is influenced by the cognitive context and work conditions in the organization, and can be aided or impeded by factors that affect the attention of individuals in the organization. We use differences in the organizational context - whether the work environment is a knowledge-rich or a knowledge-sparse environment - to show that factors such as manager involvement and perceived competition play an important part in determining whether attention to new knowledge results in greater or lesser learning. We test our hypotheses using empirical data from multiple new product development groups in a multi-division global consumer goods company. Our findings show that the cognitive influences affect the level of learning, and this learning differs based on the contextual situation created by the level of new knowledge. We also show that management oversight at the middle-manager level separates dynamic learning projects from those that are relatively inert. It is proactive middle managers who are able to help an organization acquire new knowledge and renew its innovative resources. These findings have implications for theories of innovation, competition, organizational learning, and managerial decision making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306788\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1306788","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intra-Firm Learning from Innovative Activity: The Role of Managers, Work Context and Situated Organizational Attention
In this paper we examine the organizational learning that occurs as a result of the innovative activity of new product development. We argue that learning from the new knowledge generated by the innovative activity is influenced by the cognitive context and work conditions in the organization, and can be aided or impeded by factors that affect the attention of individuals in the organization. We use differences in the organizational context - whether the work environment is a knowledge-rich or a knowledge-sparse environment - to show that factors such as manager involvement and perceived competition play an important part in determining whether attention to new knowledge results in greater or lesser learning. We test our hypotheses using empirical data from multiple new product development groups in a multi-division global consumer goods company. Our findings show that the cognitive influences affect the level of learning, and this learning differs based on the contextual situation created by the level of new knowledge. We also show that management oversight at the middle-manager level separates dynamic learning projects from those that are relatively inert. It is proactive middle managers who are able to help an organization acquire new knowledge and renew its innovative resources. These findings have implications for theories of innovation, competition, organizational learning, and managerial decision making.