阿拉伯语在线抄袭检测工具的有效性水平

Ghadah Adel, Yuping Wang
{"title":"阿拉伯语在线抄袭检测工具的有效性水平","authors":"Ghadah Adel, Yuping Wang","doi":"10.11648/J.IOTCC.20190701.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plagiarism affects education quality, academic research results and publishers reputation. Consequently, many online plagiarism tools have been developed to detect and reduce such affects. However, most of these tools were evaluated according to their abilities to reveal different rates of plagiarism in English text. While evaluating their capability in detecting different plagiarism rates from different patterns in Arabic text is still vague. This paper aims to evaluate the efficiency level of online academic plagiarism detection tools (PlagScan, iThenticate and CheckForPlagiarism.net) in detecting different plagiarism patterns’ amounts in Arabic language. A comparison was made between, PlagScan, iThenticate and CheckForPlagiarism.net, detection capabilities by merging university theses and dissertations with eight plagiarism patterns (whole document, some parts, insertion, sentence split or join, phrase reordering, syntax, lexical and morpho-syntactic) with the ratio between 90% , 30% and 10% respectively. Experiment’s results showed that iThenticate is the most efficient online plagiarism detection tool in Arabic for eight plagiarism patterns between 90% and 80% ratio Arabic language. While none of the three online plagiarism detection tools are efficient for less than 80% plagiarized text from any of the eight plagiarism patterns. Hence, mechanism enhancements and consideration to the Arabic anguage structure are recommended for online plagiarism detection tool in Arabic.","PeriodicalId":173948,"journal":{"name":"Internet of Things and Cloud Computing","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness Level of Online Plagiarism Detection Tools in Arabic\",\"authors\":\"Ghadah Adel, Yuping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.11648/J.IOTCC.20190701.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Plagiarism affects education quality, academic research results and publishers reputation. Consequently, many online plagiarism tools have been developed to detect and reduce such affects. However, most of these tools were evaluated according to their abilities to reveal different rates of plagiarism in English text. While evaluating their capability in detecting different plagiarism rates from different patterns in Arabic text is still vague. This paper aims to evaluate the efficiency level of online academic plagiarism detection tools (PlagScan, iThenticate and CheckForPlagiarism.net) in detecting different plagiarism patterns’ amounts in Arabic language. A comparison was made between, PlagScan, iThenticate and CheckForPlagiarism.net, detection capabilities by merging university theses and dissertations with eight plagiarism patterns (whole document, some parts, insertion, sentence split or join, phrase reordering, syntax, lexical and morpho-syntactic) with the ratio between 90% , 30% and 10% respectively. Experiment’s results showed that iThenticate is the most efficient online plagiarism detection tool in Arabic for eight plagiarism patterns between 90% and 80% ratio Arabic language. While none of the three online plagiarism detection tools are efficient for less than 80% plagiarized text from any of the eight plagiarism patterns. Hence, mechanism enhancements and consideration to the Arabic anguage structure are recommended for online plagiarism detection tool in Arabic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internet of Things and Cloud Computing\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internet of Things and Cloud Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IOTCC.20190701.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet of Things and Cloud Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IOTCC.20190701.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

抄袭影响教育质量、学术研究成果和出版商声誉。因此,许多在线抄袭工具已经开发出来,以检测和减少这种影响。然而,这些工具大多是根据它们揭示英语文本中不同剽窃率的能力来评估的。而对其检测阿拉伯语文本中不同模式的不同抄袭率的能力的评估仍然是模糊的。本文旨在评估在线学术剽窃检测工具(PlagScan、iThenticate和CheckForPlagiarism.net)在检测阿拉伯语不同剽窃模式数量方面的效率水平。比较了PlagScan、iThenticate和CheckForPlagiarism.net对8种抄袭模式(全文、部分、插入、句子分割或连接、短语重排、句法、词汇和形态句法)的大学毕业论文的检测能力,其比例分别为90%、30%和10%。实验结果表明,对于阿拉伯语90% ~ 80%比例的8种抄袭模式,iThenticate是最有效的在线抄袭检测工具。然而,这三种在线抄袭检测工具都不能有效地检测出八种抄袭模式中80%以下的抄袭文本。因此,建议在阿拉伯语在线抄袭检测工具中加强机制并考虑阿拉伯语的语言结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness Level of Online Plagiarism Detection Tools in Arabic
Plagiarism affects education quality, academic research results and publishers reputation. Consequently, many online plagiarism tools have been developed to detect and reduce such affects. However, most of these tools were evaluated according to their abilities to reveal different rates of plagiarism in English text. While evaluating their capability in detecting different plagiarism rates from different patterns in Arabic text is still vague. This paper aims to evaluate the efficiency level of online academic plagiarism detection tools (PlagScan, iThenticate and CheckForPlagiarism.net) in detecting different plagiarism patterns’ amounts in Arabic language. A comparison was made between, PlagScan, iThenticate and CheckForPlagiarism.net, detection capabilities by merging university theses and dissertations with eight plagiarism patterns (whole document, some parts, insertion, sentence split or join, phrase reordering, syntax, lexical and morpho-syntactic) with the ratio between 90% , 30% and 10% respectively. Experiment’s results showed that iThenticate is the most efficient online plagiarism detection tool in Arabic for eight plagiarism patterns between 90% and 80% ratio Arabic language. While none of the three online plagiarism detection tools are efficient for less than 80% plagiarized text from any of the eight plagiarism patterns. Hence, mechanism enhancements and consideration to the Arabic anguage structure are recommended for online plagiarism detection tool in Arabic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信