多任务环境下的激励、成本分配和税收

Bjorn Jorgensen, Susan Cohen Kulp, M. Maedler
{"title":"多任务环境下的激励、成本分配和税收","authors":"Bjorn Jorgensen, Susan Cohen Kulp, M. Maedler","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1215282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates strategic cost allocation in a single-period principal-agent setting, where the principal has two contractible performance measures available for contracting and the agent controls two productive tasks subject to moral hazard. In this setting, cost allocation shifts profit between the two performance measures (or between two taxable entities). There are two sources of error in cost allocation: random noise and strategic cost allocation under the agent's control. We first provide conditions under which such cost allocation errors lead the principal to abandon cost allocation and rely on a simple aggregate performance measure. We next consider a setting where the two performance measures represent divisional profits that are taxed at different rates. In this setting, the agent's ability strategically shift costs between the divisional performance measures is beneficial to the principal and leads to different relative performance weights for the two divisional performance measures.","PeriodicalId":356551,"journal":{"name":"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incentives, Cost Allocation and Taxes in a Multi-task Setting\",\"authors\":\"Bjorn Jorgensen, Susan Cohen Kulp, M. Maedler\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1215282\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper investigates strategic cost allocation in a single-period principal-agent setting, where the principal has two contractible performance measures available for contracting and the agent controls two productive tasks subject to moral hazard. In this setting, cost allocation shifts profit between the two performance measures (or between two taxable entities). There are two sources of error in cost allocation: random noise and strategic cost allocation under the agent's control. We first provide conditions under which such cost allocation errors lead the principal to abandon cost allocation and rely on a simple aggregate performance measure. We next consider a setting where the two performance measures represent divisional profits that are taxed at different rates. In this setting, the agent's ability strategically shift costs between the divisional performance measures is beneficial to the principal and leads to different relative performance weights for the two divisional performance measures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1215282\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Accounting Association Meetings (AAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1215282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文研究了单期委托代理环境下的战略成本分配问题,其中委托人有两个可签约的绩效指标,代理人控制着两个存在道德风险的生产任务。在这种情况下,成本分配在两个绩效指标之间(或在两个应税实体之间)转移利润。成本分配的误差来源有两个:随机噪声和代理控制下的战略成本分配。我们首先提供了这样的条件,在这种条件下,成本分配错误导致委托人放弃成本分配,并依赖于一个简单的总绩效指标。接下来,我们考虑一种设置,其中两种绩效指标代表按不同税率征税的部门利润。在这种情况下,代理在部门绩效指标之间策略性转移成本的能力有利于委托人,并导致两种部门绩效指标的相对绩效权重不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incentives, Cost Allocation and Taxes in a Multi-task Setting
This paper investigates strategic cost allocation in a single-period principal-agent setting, where the principal has two contractible performance measures available for contracting and the agent controls two productive tasks subject to moral hazard. In this setting, cost allocation shifts profit between the two performance measures (or between two taxable entities). There are two sources of error in cost allocation: random noise and strategic cost allocation under the agent's control. We first provide conditions under which such cost allocation errors lead the principal to abandon cost allocation and rely on a simple aggregate performance measure. We next consider a setting where the two performance measures represent divisional profits that are taxed at different rates. In this setting, the agent's ability strategically shift costs between the divisional performance measures is beneficial to the principal and leads to different relative performance weights for the two divisional performance measures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信