防泡注入优化

A. T. Derebe, Salem Al Neyadi, Fadhal Mohsen Nasser, Ibrahim Al Nuaimi, Brama Damanik, Ahmed Ibrahim Romi
{"title":"防泡注入优化","authors":"A. T. Derebe, Salem Al Neyadi, Fadhal Mohsen Nasser, Ibrahim Al Nuaimi, Brama Damanik, Ahmed Ibrahim Romi","doi":"10.2118/211189-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Habshan-5 & Sulphur Plant consists of two Rich Acid Gas Removal Units (AGRU) designed to process a total of 1340 MMSCFD of sour feed gas. These units utilize MDEA solution to produce close to H2S-free sweet gas. The objective of this study is to minimize the continuous dosing of anti-foam in the AGRUs without increasing the foaming tendencies, while maintaining sweet gas specifications. Consequently, leading to a significant reduction in the operating cost.\n The method used was the reduction in anti-foam continuous dosing rate in a gradual manner. Each phase lasted for approximately one month, which gave enough time to stabilize the unit and collect sufficient reliable data. Meanwhile, several parameters were monitored on regular basis, such as foam height, foam breakdown time, absorber pressure drop and sweet gas quality. Parameters were gathered using laboratory analysis and PI ProcessBook software. These parameters were then compared against design values and trends analyzed before making decision to go ahead with the next phase or revert to earlier dosing rate.\n In phase 1, anti-foam dosing rate was reduced from 90 L/hr. to 50 L/hr. Foam height remained below target of 20 cm and even showed slight reduction compared to before. All other parameters were within acceptable limits, and no noticeable changes compared to earlier data.\n Anti-foam dosing rate in phase 2 was reduced from 50 L/hr. to 40 L/hr. The overall foam breakdown time for both units had a small drop, which indicated a slightly reduced foaming tendency. There were no changes in the other parameters.\n The anti-foam dosing rate in phase 3 was reduced again from 40 L/hr. to 30 L/hr. All parameters were within the acceptable limits, and there were no changes compared to phase 2.\n In phase 4, anti-foam dosing rate was reduced from 30 L/hr. to 20 L/hr. Foam height and breakdown time increased significantly to 100 cm and 100 seconds respectively. It was determined that maintaining dosing rate at 20 L/hr. would eventually lead to a foaming event. Thus, dosing rate was increased back to 30L/hr. permanently and trial was completed.\n Overall anti-foam consumption was reduced by 53%. This initiative shows how decrease in operating costs can be achieved by optimizing chemical injection rate without jeopardizing the safety and integrity of the plant.","PeriodicalId":249690,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-Foam Injection Optimization\",\"authors\":\"A. T. Derebe, Salem Al Neyadi, Fadhal Mohsen Nasser, Ibrahim Al Nuaimi, Brama Damanik, Ahmed Ibrahim Romi\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/211189-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Habshan-5 & Sulphur Plant consists of two Rich Acid Gas Removal Units (AGRU) designed to process a total of 1340 MMSCFD of sour feed gas. These units utilize MDEA solution to produce close to H2S-free sweet gas. The objective of this study is to minimize the continuous dosing of anti-foam in the AGRUs without increasing the foaming tendencies, while maintaining sweet gas specifications. Consequently, leading to a significant reduction in the operating cost.\\n The method used was the reduction in anti-foam continuous dosing rate in a gradual manner. Each phase lasted for approximately one month, which gave enough time to stabilize the unit and collect sufficient reliable data. Meanwhile, several parameters were monitored on regular basis, such as foam height, foam breakdown time, absorber pressure drop and sweet gas quality. Parameters were gathered using laboratory analysis and PI ProcessBook software. These parameters were then compared against design values and trends analyzed before making decision to go ahead with the next phase or revert to earlier dosing rate.\\n In phase 1, anti-foam dosing rate was reduced from 90 L/hr. to 50 L/hr. Foam height remained below target of 20 cm and even showed slight reduction compared to before. All other parameters were within acceptable limits, and no noticeable changes compared to earlier data.\\n Anti-foam dosing rate in phase 2 was reduced from 50 L/hr. to 40 L/hr. The overall foam breakdown time for both units had a small drop, which indicated a slightly reduced foaming tendency. There were no changes in the other parameters.\\n The anti-foam dosing rate in phase 3 was reduced again from 40 L/hr. to 30 L/hr. All parameters were within the acceptable limits, and there were no changes compared to phase 2.\\n In phase 4, anti-foam dosing rate was reduced from 30 L/hr. to 20 L/hr. Foam height and breakdown time increased significantly to 100 cm and 100 seconds respectively. It was determined that maintaining dosing rate at 20 L/hr. would eventually lead to a foaming event. Thus, dosing rate was increased back to 30L/hr. permanently and trial was completed.\\n Overall anti-foam consumption was reduced by 53%. This initiative shows how decrease in operating costs can be achieved by optimizing chemical injection rate without jeopardizing the safety and integrity of the plant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":249690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/211189-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, November 01, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/211189-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Habshan-5 &硫磺装置由两个富酸性气体去除装置(agu)组成,设计用于处理总计1340 MMSCFD的酸性原料气。这些装置利用MDEA溶液生产接近无硫化氢的含硫气体。本研究的目的是尽量减少AGRUs中抗泡剂的连续剂量,而不增加泡沫倾向,同时保持甜气体规格。因此,大大降低了运营成本。采用的方法是逐步降低抗泡剂连续给药率。每个阶段持续大约一个月,有足够的时间稳定装置并收集足够可靠的数据。同时,对泡沫高度、泡沫破裂时间、吸收塔压降、含硫气体质量等参数进行了定期监测。使用实验室分析和PI ProcessBook软件收集参数。然后将这些参数与设计值和趋势进行比较,然后决定进行下一阶段或恢复到早期的给药速率。在第一阶段,抗泡剂的加药速率从90 L/hr降低。至50升/小时。泡沫高度仍然低于20厘米的目标,甚至比之前略有下降。所有其他参数均在可接受范围内,与早期数据相比无明显变化。第二阶段的抗泡剂加药速率从50 L/hr降低。至40升/小时。两个单元的整体泡沫破裂时间都有一个小的下降,这表明泡沫倾向略有降低。其他参数没有变化。第三阶段的抗泡沫加药速率从40 L/hr再次降低。至30升/小时。所有参数均在可接受范围内,与第2阶段相比无变化。在第4阶段,抗泡剂的加药速率从30 L/hr降低。至20升/小时。泡沫高度和破裂时间分别显著增加到100 cm和100秒。结果表明,维持20 L/hr的给药速率。最终会导致泡沫事件。因此,给药速率增加到30L/hr。永久和审判完成了。总体抗泡沫消耗减少了53%。这一举措表明,如何在不危及工厂安全性和完整性的情况下,通过优化化学品注入速度来降低运营成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Anti-Foam Injection Optimization
Habshan-5 & Sulphur Plant consists of two Rich Acid Gas Removal Units (AGRU) designed to process a total of 1340 MMSCFD of sour feed gas. These units utilize MDEA solution to produce close to H2S-free sweet gas. The objective of this study is to minimize the continuous dosing of anti-foam in the AGRUs without increasing the foaming tendencies, while maintaining sweet gas specifications. Consequently, leading to a significant reduction in the operating cost. The method used was the reduction in anti-foam continuous dosing rate in a gradual manner. Each phase lasted for approximately one month, which gave enough time to stabilize the unit and collect sufficient reliable data. Meanwhile, several parameters were monitored on regular basis, such as foam height, foam breakdown time, absorber pressure drop and sweet gas quality. Parameters were gathered using laboratory analysis and PI ProcessBook software. These parameters were then compared against design values and trends analyzed before making decision to go ahead with the next phase or revert to earlier dosing rate. In phase 1, anti-foam dosing rate was reduced from 90 L/hr. to 50 L/hr. Foam height remained below target of 20 cm and even showed slight reduction compared to before. All other parameters were within acceptable limits, and no noticeable changes compared to earlier data. Anti-foam dosing rate in phase 2 was reduced from 50 L/hr. to 40 L/hr. The overall foam breakdown time for both units had a small drop, which indicated a slightly reduced foaming tendency. There were no changes in the other parameters. The anti-foam dosing rate in phase 3 was reduced again from 40 L/hr. to 30 L/hr. All parameters were within the acceptable limits, and there were no changes compared to phase 2. In phase 4, anti-foam dosing rate was reduced from 30 L/hr. to 20 L/hr. Foam height and breakdown time increased significantly to 100 cm and 100 seconds respectively. It was determined that maintaining dosing rate at 20 L/hr. would eventually lead to a foaming event. Thus, dosing rate was increased back to 30L/hr. permanently and trial was completed. Overall anti-foam consumption was reduced by 53%. This initiative shows how decrease in operating costs can be achieved by optimizing chemical injection rate without jeopardizing the safety and integrity of the plant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信