{"title":"长时间牛市对大盘反应的影响对大盘和小盘股分布的影响","authors":"D. Crawford, Diana R. Franz, Gerald J. Lobo","doi":"10.1504/AJFA.2009.026486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A widely cited finding from Grinblatt et al. (1984) (hereafter GMT) is that the market response to the announcement of a small stock distribution is greater than the response to a large one. However, the GMT result is not found for distributions declared from the early 1980s through the end of the 1990s. We examine whether the bull market of 1982 through 2000 may have contributed to the attenuation of the GMT result. We hypothesise that the bull market affected the value and credibility of signals from management. These changes in the quality of the signals changed the association between the predistribution share price and the market's response to the distribution, which altered the GMT result. The evidence is consistent with our hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":379725,"journal":{"name":"American J. of Finance and Accounting","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of the prolonged bull market on the market response to large and small stock distributions\",\"authors\":\"D. Crawford, Diana R. Franz, Gerald J. Lobo\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/AJFA.2009.026486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A widely cited finding from Grinblatt et al. (1984) (hereafter GMT) is that the market response to the announcement of a small stock distribution is greater than the response to a large one. However, the GMT result is not found for distributions declared from the early 1980s through the end of the 1990s. We examine whether the bull market of 1982 through 2000 may have contributed to the attenuation of the GMT result. We hypothesise that the bull market affected the value and credibility of signals from management. These changes in the quality of the signals changed the association between the predistribution share price and the market's response to the distribution, which altered the GMT result. The evidence is consistent with our hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American J. of Finance and Accounting\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American J. of Finance and Accounting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/AJFA.2009.026486\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American J. of Finance and Accounting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/AJFA.2009.026486","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
Grinblatt et al.(1984)(以下简称GMT)的一个被广泛引用的发现是,市场对小股分布的反应大于对大股分布的反应。然而,对于从1980年代早期到1990年代末宣布的分布,没有找到GMT结果。我们考察了1982年至2000年的牛市是否可能导致了GMT结果的衰减。我们假设牛市影响了管理层发出的信号的价值和可信度。信号质量的这些变化改变了预分布股价与市场对分布的反应之间的关联,从而改变了GMT结果。证据与我们的假设一致。
The effect of the prolonged bull market on the market response to large and small stock distributions
A widely cited finding from Grinblatt et al. (1984) (hereafter GMT) is that the market response to the announcement of a small stock distribution is greater than the response to a large one. However, the GMT result is not found for distributions declared from the early 1980s through the end of the 1990s. We examine whether the bull market of 1982 through 2000 may have contributed to the attenuation of the GMT result. We hypothesise that the bull market affected the value and credibility of signals from management. These changes in the quality of the signals changed the association between the predistribution share price and the market's response to the distribution, which altered the GMT result. The evidence is consistent with our hypothesis.