对比第三方包管理的用户体验

Syful Islam, R. Kula, Christoph Treude, Bodin Chinthanet, T. Ishio, Kenichi Matsumoto
{"title":"对比第三方包管理的用户体验","authors":"Syful Islam, R. Kula, Christoph Treude, Bodin Chinthanet, T. Ishio, Kenichi Matsumoto","doi":"10.26226/morressier.613b5419842293c031b5b64b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The management of third-party package dependencies is crucial to most technology stacks, with package managers acting as brokers to ensure that a verified package is correctly installed, configured, or removed from an application. Diversity in technology stacks has led to dozens of package ecosystems with their own management features. While recent studies have shown that developers struggle to migrate their dependencies, the common assumption is that package ecosystems are used without any issue. In this study, we explore 13 package ecosystems to understand whether their features correlate with the experience of their users. By studying experience through the questions that developers ask on the question-and-answer site Stack Overflow, we find that developer questions are grouped into three themes (i.e., Package management, Input-Output, and Package Usage). Our preliminary analysis indicates that specific features are correlated with the user experience. Our work lays out future directions to investigate the trade-offs involved in designing the ideal package ecosystem.","PeriodicalId":205629,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrasting Third-Party Package Management User Experience\",\"authors\":\"Syful Islam, R. Kula, Christoph Treude, Bodin Chinthanet, T. Ishio, Kenichi Matsumoto\",\"doi\":\"10.26226/morressier.613b5419842293c031b5b64b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The management of third-party package dependencies is crucial to most technology stacks, with package managers acting as brokers to ensure that a verified package is correctly installed, configured, or removed from an application. Diversity in technology stacks has led to dozens of package ecosystems with their own management features. While recent studies have shown that developers struggle to migrate their dependencies, the common assumption is that package ecosystems are used without any issue. In this study, we explore 13 package ecosystems to understand whether their features correlate with the experience of their users. By studying experience through the questions that developers ask on the question-and-answer site Stack Overflow, we find that developer questions are grouped into three themes (i.e., Package management, Input-Output, and Package Usage). Our preliminary analysis indicates that specific features are correlated with the user experience. Our work lays out future directions to investigate the trade-offs involved in designing the ideal package ecosystem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":205629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.613b5419842293c031b5b64b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.613b5419842293c031b5b64b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

第三方包依赖关系的管理对大多数技术栈来说是至关重要的,包管理器充当代理,以确保经过验证的包被正确地安装、配置或从应用程序中删除。技术堆栈的多样性导致了数十个具有各自管理功能的包生态系统。虽然最近的研究表明开发人员很难迁移他们的依赖,但通常的假设是使用包生态系统没有任何问题。在这项研究中,我们探索了13个包生态系统,以了解它们的功能是否与用户的体验相关。通过研究开发人员在问答网站Stack Overflow上提出的问题的经验,我们发现开发人员的问题分为三个主题(即,包管理,输入-输出和包使用)。我们的初步分析表明,特定功能与用户体验相关。我们的工作为研究设计理想的软件包生态系统所涉及的权衡提供了未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrasting Third-Party Package Management User Experience
The management of third-party package dependencies is crucial to most technology stacks, with package managers acting as brokers to ensure that a verified package is correctly installed, configured, or removed from an application. Diversity in technology stacks has led to dozens of package ecosystems with their own management features. While recent studies have shown that developers struggle to migrate their dependencies, the common assumption is that package ecosystems are used without any issue. In this study, we explore 13 package ecosystems to understand whether their features correlate with the experience of their users. By studying experience through the questions that developers ask on the question-and-answer site Stack Overflow, we find that developer questions are grouped into three themes (i.e., Package management, Input-Output, and Package Usage). Our preliminary analysis indicates that specific features are correlated with the user experience. Our work lays out future directions to investigate the trade-offs involved in designing the ideal package ecosystem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信