人工投资组合模拟器

Matjaž Steinbacher
{"title":"人工投资组合模拟器","authors":"Matjaž Steinbacher","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1476460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Portfolio selection simulator of social interaction is proposed in this paper. We explained why different investors possess different portfolios in time and why portfolios change with the change of the environment. The developments of the games are path-dependent depending on several factors. The most significant are the returns, the rate of maximization, selection of an investor, the presence of liquidity investors and the number of alternatives. The main empirical conclusion is that investors opt for medium-risky to risky alternatives and avoid both extremes.","PeriodicalId":374208,"journal":{"name":"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Portfolio Simulator\",\"authors\":\"Matjaž Steinbacher\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1476460\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Portfolio selection simulator of social interaction is proposed in this paper. We explained why different investors possess different portfolios in time and why portfolios change with the change of the environment. The developments of the games are path-dependent depending on several factors. The most significant are the returns, the rate of maximization, selection of an investor, the presence of liquidity investors and the number of alternatives. The main empirical conclusion is that investors opt for medium-risky to risky alternatives and avoid both extremes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1476460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chicago Booth Fama-Miller: Finance - Other (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1476460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种基于社会互动的投资组合选择模拟器。我们解释了为什么不同的投资者在时间上拥有不同的投资组合,以及为什么投资组合会随着环境的变化而变化。游戏的发展取决于若干因素。最重要的是收益、最大化率、投资者的选择、流动性投资者的存在和备选方案的数量。主要的实证结论是,投资者选择中等风险到高风险的替代方案,并避免这两个极端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Portfolio Simulator
Portfolio selection simulator of social interaction is proposed in this paper. We explained why different investors possess different portfolios in time and why portfolios change with the change of the environment. The developments of the games are path-dependent depending on several factors. The most significant are the returns, the rate of maximization, selection of an investor, the presence of liquidity investors and the number of alternatives. The main empirical conclusion is that investors opt for medium-risky to risky alternatives and avoid both extremes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信