Syi 'ah和口译al-M zīfānīTafs Muḥīrān可兰经作品ammadḤusein al -Ṭabāā”选项卡ī

Anshori Anshori
{"title":"Syi 'ah和口译al-M zīfānīTafs Muḥīrān可兰经作品ammadḤusein al -Ṭabāā”选项卡ī","authors":"Anshori Anshori","doi":"10.15548/ju.v11i1.1906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the interpretation of Muhammad Husein al-Tabataba’i on QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 and QS. al-Baqarah (2): 136 in his commentary, al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. This study aims to show that there is a side of moderation in the interpretation of al-Ṭabataba'i which leads to the Sunni meaning, in this case, the interpretation of monotheism. The research method used in this study is descriptive analysis, which is to collect related data and then analyze it. The data analysis used refers to what is offered by Huberman & Miles, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions or verification. The results of this study indicate that the interpretation of al-Ṭabataba'i on QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 and QS. al-Baqarah (2): 136 is different from the interpretation of the Shiites, in this case, the interpretation of al-Kulaini. Al-Ṭabataba'i interprets the word shirk in QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 by associating partners with Allah as is the case with the Sunnis, not associating partners with the Imams, as interpreted by al-Kulaini. Then also interpret the word of God \"qulu amanna billah ...\" in QS. al-Baqarah (2) 136 by witnessing faith in Allah and also in the Prophets, differs from the interpretation of al-Kulaini which explains that what is meant by \"believing in what Allah has sent down\" is believing in Ali, Fatima, Hasan, Husein, and the Imams after them.","PeriodicalId":138175,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ulunnuha","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Syi’ah dan Tafsir al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān karya Muḥammad Ḥusein al-Ṭabātabā’ī\",\"authors\":\"Anshori Anshori\",\"doi\":\"10.15548/ju.v11i1.1906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the interpretation of Muhammad Husein al-Tabataba’i on QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 and QS. al-Baqarah (2): 136 in his commentary, al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. This study aims to show that there is a side of moderation in the interpretation of al-Ṭabataba'i which leads to the Sunni meaning, in this case, the interpretation of monotheism. The research method used in this study is descriptive analysis, which is to collect related data and then analyze it. The data analysis used refers to what is offered by Huberman & Miles, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions or verification. The results of this study indicate that the interpretation of al-Ṭabataba'i on QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 and QS. al-Baqarah (2): 136 is different from the interpretation of the Shiites, in this case, the interpretation of al-Kulaini. Al-Ṭabataba'i interprets the word shirk in QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 by associating partners with Allah as is the case with the Sunnis, not associating partners with the Imams, as interpreted by al-Kulaini. Then also interpret the word of God \\\"qulu amanna billah ...\\\" in QS. al-Baqarah (2) 136 by witnessing faith in Allah and also in the Prophets, differs from the interpretation of al-Kulaini which explains that what is meant by \\\"believing in what Allah has sent down\\\" is believing in Ali, Fatima, Hasan, Husein, and the Imams after them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138175,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ulunnuha\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ulunnuha\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v11i1.1906\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ulunnuha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v11i1.1906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了穆罕默德·侯赛因·塔巴塔巴对QS的解释。al-Zumar(39): 65和QS。al-Baqarah(2): 136在他的注释中,al-Mizan fi Tafsir al- quuran。本研究旨在表明,在al-Ṭabataba'i的解释中有温和的一面,这导致了逊尼派的意义,在这种情况下,一神教的解释。本研究使用的研究方法是描述性分析,即收集相关数据,然后进行分析。所使用的数据分析是指Huberman & Miles提供的数据,即数据简化,数据呈现,结论或验证。本研究结果表明,al-Ṭabataba'i对QS的解释。al-Zumar(39): 65和QS。al-Baqarah(2): 136与什叶派的解释不同,在这种情况下,是al-Kulaini的解释。Al-Ṭabataba'i在QS中解释了shirk这个词。祖玛(39):65与安拉结盟,就像与逊尼派结盟一样,而不是与伊玛目结盟,如库莱尼所解释的那样。然后还要解释QS中上帝的话“qulu amanna billah…”。al-Baqarah(2) 136见证了对安拉和先知的信仰,这与al-Kulaini的解释不同,al-Kulaini解释说,“相信安拉降下的”意味着相信阿里、法蒂玛、哈桑、侯赛因和他们之后的伊玛目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Syi’ah dan Tafsir al-Mīzān fī Tafsīr al-Qur’ān karya Muḥammad Ḥusein al-Ṭabātabā’ī
This paper examines the interpretation of Muhammad Husein al-Tabataba’i on QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 and QS. al-Baqarah (2): 136 in his commentary, al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. This study aims to show that there is a side of moderation in the interpretation of al-Ṭabataba'i which leads to the Sunni meaning, in this case, the interpretation of monotheism. The research method used in this study is descriptive analysis, which is to collect related data and then analyze it. The data analysis used refers to what is offered by Huberman & Miles, namely, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusions or verification. The results of this study indicate that the interpretation of al-Ṭabataba'i on QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 and QS. al-Baqarah (2): 136 is different from the interpretation of the Shiites, in this case, the interpretation of al-Kulaini. Al-Ṭabataba'i interprets the word shirk in QS. al-Zumar (39): 65 by associating partners with Allah as is the case with the Sunnis, not associating partners with the Imams, as interpreted by al-Kulaini. Then also interpret the word of God "qulu amanna billah ..." in QS. al-Baqarah (2) 136 by witnessing faith in Allah and also in the Prophets, differs from the interpretation of al-Kulaini which explains that what is meant by "believing in what Allah has sent down" is believing in Ali, Fatima, Hasan, Husein, and the Imams after them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信