并非所有的传球都是平等的:从跟踪数据客观地衡量足球中传球的风险和回报

P. Power, Héctor Ruiz, Xinyu Wei, P. Lucey
{"title":"并非所有的传球都是平等的:从跟踪数据客观地衡量足球中传球的风险和回报","authors":"P. Power, Héctor Ruiz, Xinyu Wei, P. Lucey","doi":"10.1145/3097983.3098051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In soccer, the most frequent event that occurs is a pass. For a trained eye, there are a myriad of adjectives which could describe this event (e.g., \"majestic pass\", \"conservative\" to \"poor-ball\"). However, as these events are needed to be coded live and in real-time (most often by human annotators), the current method of grading passes is restricted to the binary labels 0 (unsuccessful) or 1 (successful). Obviously, this is sub-optimal because the quality of a pass needs to be measured on a continuous spectrum (i.e., 0 to 100%) and not a binary value. Additionally, a pass can be measured across multiple dimensions, namely: i) risk -- the likelihood of executing a pass in a given situation, and ii) reward -- the likelihood of a pass creating a chance. In this paper, we show how we estimate both the risk and reward of a pass across two seasons of tracking data captured from a recent professional soccer league with state-of-the-art performance, then showcase various use cases of our deployed passing system.","PeriodicalId":314049,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"82","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not All Passes Are Created Equal: Objectively Measuring the Risk and Reward of Passes in Soccer from Tracking Data\",\"authors\":\"P. Power, Héctor Ruiz, Xinyu Wei, P. Lucey\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3097983.3098051\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In soccer, the most frequent event that occurs is a pass. For a trained eye, there are a myriad of adjectives which could describe this event (e.g., \\\"majestic pass\\\", \\\"conservative\\\" to \\\"poor-ball\\\"). However, as these events are needed to be coded live and in real-time (most often by human annotators), the current method of grading passes is restricted to the binary labels 0 (unsuccessful) or 1 (successful). Obviously, this is sub-optimal because the quality of a pass needs to be measured on a continuous spectrum (i.e., 0 to 100%) and not a binary value. Additionally, a pass can be measured across multiple dimensions, namely: i) risk -- the likelihood of executing a pass in a given situation, and ii) reward -- the likelihood of a pass creating a chance. In this paper, we show how we estimate both the risk and reward of a pass across two seasons of tracking data captured from a recent professional soccer league with state-of-the-art performance, then showcase various use cases of our deployed passing system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"82\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3097983.3098051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 82

摘要

在足球比赛中,最常见的是传球。对于训练有素的人来说,有无数的形容词可以描述这个事件(例如,“雄伟的传球”,“保守的”到“可怜的球”)。然而,由于这些事件需要实时编码(通常由人工注释器编写),因此当前的分级方法仅限于二进制标签0(不成功)或1(成功)。显然,这是次优的,因为通过的质量需要在连续谱(即0到100%)上测量,而不是二进制值。此外,通过可以通过多个维度进行衡量,即:i)风险—-在给定情况下执行通过的可能性,以及ii)奖励—-通过创造机会的可能性。在本文中,我们展示了如何通过跟踪从最近的具有最先进性能的职业足球联赛中捕获的两个赛季的数据来评估传球的风险和回报,然后展示了我们部署的传球系统的各种用例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Not All Passes Are Created Equal: Objectively Measuring the Risk and Reward of Passes in Soccer from Tracking Data
In soccer, the most frequent event that occurs is a pass. For a trained eye, there are a myriad of adjectives which could describe this event (e.g., "majestic pass", "conservative" to "poor-ball"). However, as these events are needed to be coded live and in real-time (most often by human annotators), the current method of grading passes is restricted to the binary labels 0 (unsuccessful) or 1 (successful). Obviously, this is sub-optimal because the quality of a pass needs to be measured on a continuous spectrum (i.e., 0 to 100%) and not a binary value. Additionally, a pass can be measured across multiple dimensions, namely: i) risk -- the likelihood of executing a pass in a given situation, and ii) reward -- the likelihood of a pass creating a chance. In this paper, we show how we estimate both the risk and reward of a pass across two seasons of tracking data captured from a recent professional soccer league with state-of-the-art performance, then showcase various use cases of our deployed passing system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信