{"title":"俄罗斯和英国媒体对乌克兰危机的新闻框架","authors":"Zixiu Liu","doi":"10.31165/nk.2019.121.550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This pilot study uses quantitative content analysis following the framework of generic frames, diagnostic and prognostic frames (Godefroidt et al. 2016) to compare the news framing of the Ukraine crisis in Russia and the UK from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014. The Moscow Times and The Guardian were chosen as examples of quality print media with online editions that are comparable in terms of quality, circulation rate, political stance, and more importantly – global targeting. The study argues that firstly, the media in both countries were more likely to report through conflict lens, followed by responsibility frame. Secondly, the difference between the Eastern and Western media was tracked. While the Russian media relatively preferred economic consequence frame reflecting the country’s geopolitical interests, the British media tended to use human-interest frame highlighting unfairness and non-proportionality.","PeriodicalId":299414,"journal":{"name":"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"News framing of the Ukraine crisis in the Russian and British media\",\"authors\":\"Zixiu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.31165/nk.2019.121.550\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This pilot study uses quantitative content analysis following the framework of generic frames, diagnostic and prognostic frames (Godefroidt et al. 2016) to compare the news framing of the Ukraine crisis in Russia and the UK from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014. The Moscow Times and The Guardian were chosen as examples of quality print media with online editions that are comparable in terms of quality, circulation rate, political stance, and more importantly – global targeting. The study argues that firstly, the media in both countries were more likely to report through conflict lens, followed by responsibility frame. Secondly, the difference between the Eastern and Western media was tracked. While the Russian media relatively preferred economic consequence frame reflecting the country’s geopolitical interests, the British media tended to use human-interest frame highlighting unfairness and non-proportionality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299414,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2019.121.550\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Networking Knowledge: Journal of the MeCCSA Postgraduate Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31165/nk.2019.121.550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本试点研究采用定量内容分析,遵循通用框架、诊断框架和预测框架(Godefroidt et al. 2016)的框架,比较2013年11月30日至2014年2月26日俄罗斯和英国乌克兰危机的新闻框架。《莫斯科时报》(Moscow Times)和《卫报》(The Guardian)被选为高质量纸媒的代表,它们的网络版在质量、发行量、政治立场,以及更重要的全球目标方面都不相上下。研究认为,首先,两国媒体更倾向于通过冲突镜头进行报道,其次是责任框架。其次,追踪东西方媒体之间的差异。俄罗斯媒体相对偏爱反映本国地缘政治利益的经济后果框架,而英国媒体则倾向于使用凸显不公平和不成比例性的人文利益框架。
News framing of the Ukraine crisis in the Russian and British media
This pilot study uses quantitative content analysis following the framework of generic frames, diagnostic and prognostic frames (Godefroidt et al. 2016) to compare the news framing of the Ukraine crisis in Russia and the UK from 30 November 2013 to 26 February 2014. The Moscow Times and The Guardian were chosen as examples of quality print media with online editions that are comparable in terms of quality, circulation rate, political stance, and more importantly – global targeting. The study argues that firstly, the media in both countries were more likely to report through conflict lens, followed by responsibility frame. Secondly, the difference between the Eastern and Western media was tracked. While the Russian media relatively preferred economic consequence frame reflecting the country’s geopolitical interests, the British media tended to use human-interest frame highlighting unfairness and non-proportionality.