利用评估系统促进更好的评估和学习

Hannah Kitchen, G. Bethell, Elizabeth Fordham, Kirsteen Henderson, Richard Ruochen Li
{"title":"利用评估系统促进更好的评估和学习","authors":"Hannah Kitchen, G. Bethell, Elizabeth Fordham, Kirsteen Henderson, Richard Ruochen Li","doi":"10.1787/ecdc6300-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at how the evaluation system – teacher appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation – interacts with practices for student assessment. While Turkey’s evaluation system encourages teachers and schools to focus on student achievement, achievement is frequently measured by numeric marks. This encourages a perception that it is high marks which are most important for learning. It also means that policymaking decisions around student outcomes are not based on reliable and valid data, since marks from classroom assessment can vary significantly across classrooms and schools. This chapter suggests how teacher appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation frameworks can be revised to encourage the kinds of quality assessment practices that research shows are most effective for learning.","PeriodicalId":198401,"journal":{"name":"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using the evaluation system to promote better assessment and learning\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Kitchen, G. Bethell, Elizabeth Fordham, Kirsteen Henderson, Richard Ruochen Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1787/ecdc6300-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks at how the evaluation system – teacher appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation – interacts with practices for student assessment. While Turkey’s evaluation system encourages teachers and schools to focus on student achievement, achievement is frequently measured by numeric marks. This encourages a perception that it is high marks which are most important for learning. It also means that policymaking decisions around student outcomes are not based on reliable and valid data, since marks from classroom assessment can vary significantly across classrooms and schools. This chapter suggests how teacher appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation frameworks can be revised to encourage the kinds of quality assessment practices that research shows are most effective for learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1787/ecdc6300-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OECD Reviews of Evaluation and Assessment in Education: Student Assessment in Turkey","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ecdc6300-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章着眼于评估系统——教师评估、学校评估和系统评估——如何与学生评估实践相互作用。虽然土耳其的评估体系鼓励教师和学校关注学生的成绩,但成绩通常是用数字分数来衡量的。这鼓励了一种观念,即高分对学习最重要。这也意味着,围绕学生成绩做出的决策并不是基于可靠和有效的数据,因为课堂评估的分数在不同的教室和学校之间差异很大。本章建议如何修改教师评估、学校评估和系统评估框架,以鼓励研究表明对学习最有效的各种质量评估实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using the evaluation system to promote better assessment and learning
This chapter looks at how the evaluation system – teacher appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation – interacts with practices for student assessment. While Turkey’s evaluation system encourages teachers and schools to focus on student achievement, achievement is frequently measured by numeric marks. This encourages a perception that it is high marks which are most important for learning. It also means that policymaking decisions around student outcomes are not based on reliable and valid data, since marks from classroom assessment can vary significantly across classrooms and schools. This chapter suggests how teacher appraisal, school evaluation and system evaluation frameworks can be revised to encourage the kinds of quality assessment practices that research shows are most effective for learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信