租购施工合同及其与刑事犯罪的关系

Bambang Tri Bawono
{"title":"租购施工合同及其与刑事犯罪的关系","authors":"Bambang Tri Bawono","doi":"10.26532/ijlr.v3i1.5265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hire purchase agreements that have developed in the realm of society yet have clarity because there is no specific legislation governing the lease-sale agreement. The absence of specific legislation governing the lease resulted in the agreement to experience different views for legal experts both in terms of the definition and the legal consequences arising. This type of research used in this study is a research library with normative juridical approach. Normative research. The results of this study mention: first, the legal construction of a hire purchase agreement did not have legal certainty, because this agreement has legal consequences of changing from the payment of the debt to the payment of rent, when a tort committed by the purchaser. Other than that, construction law hire purchase agreement is null and void, because there are some clauses which are contrary to Article 1266 of the Civil Code and Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. Second, the criminal offenses arising from a lease agreement is a criminal offense of extortion, when the withdrawal unilaterally, although financing the vehicle has been registered in the Register of Fiduciary. This is because even though the fiduciary has the right of executor, but the execution must follow procedures for the implementation of a court decision, so businesses must apply in advance to the Chairman of the Court.","PeriodicalId":425396,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law Reconstruction","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT OF HIRE PURCHASE AND CORRELATION WITH CRIMINAL OFFENSE\",\"authors\":\"Bambang Tri Bawono\",\"doi\":\"10.26532/ijlr.v3i1.5265\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Hire purchase agreements that have developed in the realm of society yet have clarity because there is no specific legislation governing the lease-sale agreement. The absence of specific legislation governing the lease resulted in the agreement to experience different views for legal experts both in terms of the definition and the legal consequences arising. This type of research used in this study is a research library with normative juridical approach. Normative research. The results of this study mention: first, the legal construction of a hire purchase agreement did not have legal certainty, because this agreement has legal consequences of changing from the payment of the debt to the payment of rent, when a tort committed by the purchaser. Other than that, construction law hire purchase agreement is null and void, because there are some clauses which are contrary to Article 1266 of the Civil Code and Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. Second, the criminal offenses arising from a lease agreement is a criminal offense of extortion, when the withdrawal unilaterally, although financing the vehicle has been registered in the Register of Fiduciary. This is because even though the fiduciary has the right of executor, but the execution must follow procedures for the implementation of a court decision, so businesses must apply in advance to the Chairman of the Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":425396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Law Reconstruction\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Law Reconstruction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v3i1.5265\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26532/ijlr.v3i1.5265","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

租赁购买协议已经在社会领域发展起来,但由于没有具体的立法来管理租赁销售协议,因此具有清晰度。由于缺乏管理租赁的具体立法,因此,法律专家对该协议的定义和所产生的法律后果有不同的看法。本研究使用的研究类型是一个具有规范性法律方法的研究库。规范性研究。本研究的结果提到:首先,租购协议的法律建构不具备法律确定性,因为当购买者实施侵权行为时,租购协议具有从支付债务变为支付租金的法律后果。除此之外,建筑法代购协议是无效的,因为其中有一些条款与民法典第1266条和消费者保护法第18条相抵触。第二,由租赁协议引起的刑事犯罪是敲诈勒索的刑事犯罪,当单方面退出时,尽管融资车辆已在受托人登记册中登记。这是因为,虽然受托人拥有执行权,但执行必须遵循法院判决的执行程序,因此企业必须事先向法院院长提出申请。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT OF HIRE PURCHASE AND CORRELATION WITH CRIMINAL OFFENSE
Hire purchase agreements that have developed in the realm of society yet have clarity because there is no specific legislation governing the lease-sale agreement. The absence of specific legislation governing the lease resulted in the agreement to experience different views for legal experts both in terms of the definition and the legal consequences arising. This type of research used in this study is a research library with normative juridical approach. Normative research. The results of this study mention: first, the legal construction of a hire purchase agreement did not have legal certainty, because this agreement has legal consequences of changing from the payment of the debt to the payment of rent, when a tort committed by the purchaser. Other than that, construction law hire purchase agreement is null and void, because there are some clauses which are contrary to Article 1266 of the Civil Code and Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Act. Second, the criminal offenses arising from a lease agreement is a criminal offense of extortion, when the withdrawal unilaterally, although financing the vehicle has been registered in the Register of Fiduciary. This is because even though the fiduciary has the right of executor, but the execution must follow procedures for the implementation of a court decision, so businesses must apply in advance to the Chairman of the Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信