利基vs.广度:通过细粒度分析计算专业知识

José Ricardo da Silva, E. Clua, Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta, A. Sarma
{"title":"利基vs.广度:通过细粒度分析计算专业知识","authors":"José Ricardo da Silva, E. Clua, Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta, A. Sarma","doi":"10.1109/SANER.2015.7081851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying expertise in a project is essential for task allocation, knowledge dissemination, and risk management, among other activities. However, keeping a detailed record of such expertise at class and method levels is cumbersome due to project size, evolution, and team turnover. Existing approaches that automate this task have limitations in terms of the number and granularity of elements that can be analyzed and the analysis timeframe. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique to identify expertise for a given project, package, file, class, or method by considering not only the total number of edits that a developer has made, but also the spread of their changes in an artifact over time, and thereby the breadth of their expertise. We use Dominoes - our GPU-based approach for exploratory repository analysis - for expertise identification over any given granularity and time period with a short processing time. We evaluated our approach through Apache Derby and observed that granularity and time can have significant influence on expertise identification.","PeriodicalId":355949,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Niche vs. breadth: Calculating expertise over time through a fine-grained analysis\",\"authors\":\"José Ricardo da Silva, E. Clua, Leonardo Gresta Paulino Murta, A. Sarma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SANER.2015.7081851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying expertise in a project is essential for task allocation, knowledge dissemination, and risk management, among other activities. However, keeping a detailed record of such expertise at class and method levels is cumbersome due to project size, evolution, and team turnover. Existing approaches that automate this task have limitations in terms of the number and granularity of elements that can be analyzed and the analysis timeframe. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique to identify expertise for a given project, package, file, class, or method by considering not only the total number of edits that a developer has made, but also the spread of their changes in an artifact over time, and thereby the breadth of their expertise. We use Dominoes - our GPU-based approach for exploratory repository analysis - for expertise identification over any given granularity and time period with a short processing time. We evaluated our approach through Apache Derby and observed that granularity and time can have significant influence on expertise identification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2015.7081851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE 22nd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2015.7081851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

摘要

识别项目中的专业知识对于任务分配、知识传播和风险管理以及其他活动是必不可少的。然而,由于项目的规模、发展和团队的更替,在类和方法级别上保持这样的专业知识的详细记录是很麻烦的。自动化此任务的现有方法在可以分析的元素的数量和粒度以及分析时间范围方面存在限制。在本文中,我们介绍了一种新的技术,通过不仅考虑开发人员所做的编辑的总数,而且考虑他们在工件中所做的更改的扩展,从而确定给定项目、包、文件、类或方法的专业知识,从而确定他们的专业知识的广度。我们使用dominos——我们基于gpu的探索性存储库分析方法——在任何给定的粒度和时间段内以较短的处理时间进行专家鉴定。我们通过Apache Derby评估了我们的方法,并观察到粒度和时间会对专家识别产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Niche vs. breadth: Calculating expertise over time through a fine-grained analysis
Identifying expertise in a project is essential for task allocation, knowledge dissemination, and risk management, among other activities. However, keeping a detailed record of such expertise at class and method levels is cumbersome due to project size, evolution, and team turnover. Existing approaches that automate this task have limitations in terms of the number and granularity of elements that can be analyzed and the analysis timeframe. In this paper, we introduce a novel technique to identify expertise for a given project, package, file, class, or method by considering not only the total number of edits that a developer has made, but also the spread of their changes in an artifact over time, and thereby the breadth of their expertise. We use Dominoes - our GPU-based approach for exploratory repository analysis - for expertise identification over any given granularity and time period with a short processing time. We evaluated our approach through Apache Derby and observed that granularity and time can have significant influence on expertise identification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信