运输历史方法论:新的趋势和观点

M. Moraglio
{"title":"运输历史方法论:新的趋势和观点","authors":"M. Moraglio","doi":"10.1177/00225266221103038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This issue is a collection of papers regarding methodology in transport history. These papers represent the answer to JTH’s CfP launched in 2020 on the topic of transport history ontologies. Many of the papers making up this Special Issue, not too surprisingly, have a strong focus on the spatial dimension of transport, as well as on the politics of mobility. Although those foci are not new, it is interesting to note how this opens up new research avenues and broadens the field’s horizons. In this vein, this Special Issue not only offers food for discussion but is also a positive sign of the fruitful ongoing discussion about refreshing our research tools and approaches in transport and mobility history. Far from being an arrival point, this Special Issue aims to further trigger the debate, and The Journal of Transport History is simply keen to offer space for more discussion. The first paper, by Govind Gopakumar, focuses on the historical imagination of transport. Using the case of the city of Bengaluru, the author targets the concept of “usable past” and its application in pre/post/colonial histories. Here, the idea of “displaced past” offers an angle to better contextualise the usable past, and eventually to question how much the (mobility) past in colonial and post-colonial countries may not necessarily be “usable”. This critical approach is based on the ubiquities of frictions and resistance to mobility (openly referring to Cresswell’s ideas), all driving to an intriguing concept of “Displaced Past”. Giovanni Favero, Michael-W. Serruys, and Miki Sugiura also address the spatial element of mobility, in their case on the 1980s Urban network theory, it is “an incomplete mapping of hinterlands and the prevalence of neo-Christallerian model”. The authors propose to further build on an “urban logistic network”, to focus on “the interaction between urban systems on one hand, and transport and mobility on the other”. This approach better bridges “urban history and transport history”, therefore making Editorial","PeriodicalId":336494,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Transport History","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transport history methodology: New trends and perspectives\",\"authors\":\"M. Moraglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00225266221103038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This issue is a collection of papers regarding methodology in transport history. These papers represent the answer to JTH’s CfP launched in 2020 on the topic of transport history ontologies. Many of the papers making up this Special Issue, not too surprisingly, have a strong focus on the spatial dimension of transport, as well as on the politics of mobility. Although those foci are not new, it is interesting to note how this opens up new research avenues and broadens the field’s horizons. In this vein, this Special Issue not only offers food for discussion but is also a positive sign of the fruitful ongoing discussion about refreshing our research tools and approaches in transport and mobility history. Far from being an arrival point, this Special Issue aims to further trigger the debate, and The Journal of Transport History is simply keen to offer space for more discussion. The first paper, by Govind Gopakumar, focuses on the historical imagination of transport. Using the case of the city of Bengaluru, the author targets the concept of “usable past” and its application in pre/post/colonial histories. Here, the idea of “displaced past” offers an angle to better contextualise the usable past, and eventually to question how much the (mobility) past in colonial and post-colonial countries may not necessarily be “usable”. This critical approach is based on the ubiquities of frictions and resistance to mobility (openly referring to Cresswell’s ideas), all driving to an intriguing concept of “Displaced Past”. Giovanni Favero, Michael-W. Serruys, and Miki Sugiura also address the spatial element of mobility, in their case on the 1980s Urban network theory, it is “an incomplete mapping of hinterlands and the prevalence of neo-Christallerian model”. The authors propose to further build on an “urban logistic network”, to focus on “the interaction between urban systems on one hand, and transport and mobility on the other”. This approach better bridges “urban history and transport history”, therefore making Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":336494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Transport History\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Transport History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266221103038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Transport History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00225266221103038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这期是关于运输史方法论的论文汇编。这些论文代表了JTH在2020年推出的关于运输历史本体主题的CfP的答案。不出所料,本期特刊的许多论文都非常关注交通的空间维度,以及交通的政治。虽然这些焦点并不新鲜,但有趣的是,这开辟了新的研究途径,拓宽了该领域的视野。在这方面,本期特刊不仅提供了讨论的素材,而且是一个积极的迹象,表明我们正在进行的关于更新我们在运输和移动历史上的研究工具和方法的富有成效的讨论。这期特刊旨在进一步引发辩论,而《交通历史杂志》只是热衷于为更多的讨论提供空间,而不是作为一个起点。第一篇论文由戈文德·戈帕库马尔(Govind Gopakumar)撰写,重点关注交通运输的历史想象。以班加罗尔为例,作者针对“可用的过去”的概念及其在前/后/殖民历史中的应用。在这里,“流离失所的过去”的概念提供了一个角度,可以更好地将可用的过去置于背景中,并最终质疑殖民和后殖民国家的(流动性)过去在多大程度上不一定是“可用的”。这种批判性的方法是基于无处不在的摩擦和对流动性的抵制(公开引用克雷斯韦尔的想法),所有这些都推动了一个有趣的概念“流离失所的过去”。乔瓦尼·法维罗,迈克尔·w。Serruys和Miki Sugiura也谈到了流动性的空间要素,在他们20世纪80年代的城市网络理论中,它是“腹地的不完整映射和新克里斯塔勒模型的流行”。作者建议进一步构建“城市物流网络”,关注“城市系统之间的相互作用,另一方面是运输和流动”。这种方法更好地连接了“城市历史和交通历史”,因此,社论
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transport history methodology: New trends and perspectives
This issue is a collection of papers regarding methodology in transport history. These papers represent the answer to JTH’s CfP launched in 2020 on the topic of transport history ontologies. Many of the papers making up this Special Issue, not too surprisingly, have a strong focus on the spatial dimension of transport, as well as on the politics of mobility. Although those foci are not new, it is interesting to note how this opens up new research avenues and broadens the field’s horizons. In this vein, this Special Issue not only offers food for discussion but is also a positive sign of the fruitful ongoing discussion about refreshing our research tools and approaches in transport and mobility history. Far from being an arrival point, this Special Issue aims to further trigger the debate, and The Journal of Transport History is simply keen to offer space for more discussion. The first paper, by Govind Gopakumar, focuses on the historical imagination of transport. Using the case of the city of Bengaluru, the author targets the concept of “usable past” and its application in pre/post/colonial histories. Here, the idea of “displaced past” offers an angle to better contextualise the usable past, and eventually to question how much the (mobility) past in colonial and post-colonial countries may not necessarily be “usable”. This critical approach is based on the ubiquities of frictions and resistance to mobility (openly referring to Cresswell’s ideas), all driving to an intriguing concept of “Displaced Past”. Giovanni Favero, Michael-W. Serruys, and Miki Sugiura also address the spatial element of mobility, in their case on the 1980s Urban network theory, it is “an incomplete mapping of hinterlands and the prevalence of neo-Christallerian model”. The authors propose to further build on an “urban logistic network”, to focus on “the interaction between urban systems on one hand, and transport and mobility on the other”. This approach better bridges “urban history and transport history”, therefore making Editorial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信