金属锥球插入和介质透镜校正锥形角的性能比较

C. Y. Tan, K. Selvan
{"title":"金属锥球插入和介质透镜校正锥形角的性能比较","authors":"C. Y. Tan, K. Selvan","doi":"10.1109/RFM.2008.4897391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of metallic cone-sphere-inserted and plano-convex dielectric lens-corrected conical horns. The parameters considered in the study are gain, aperture efficiency, peak cross-polarization, radiation patterns and return loss. It emerges from the comparative study that, in an overall sense, the metallic cone-sphere-inserted conical horn outperforms the lens-corrected horn.","PeriodicalId":329128,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance comparison of metallic cone-sphere-inserted and dielectric lens-corrected conical horns\",\"authors\":\"C. Y. Tan, K. Selvan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RFM.2008.4897391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the performance of metallic cone-sphere-inserted and plano-convex dielectric lens-corrected conical horns. The parameters considered in the study are gain, aperture efficiency, peak cross-polarization, radiation patterns and return loss. It emerges from the comparative study that, in an overall sense, the metallic cone-sphere-inserted conical horn outperforms the lens-corrected horn.\",\"PeriodicalId\":329128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFM.2008.4897391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RFM.2008.4897391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文比较了金属锥球插入和光凸介电透镜校正锥形角的性能。研究中考虑的参数包括增益、孔径效率、峰值交叉极化、辐射方向图和回波损耗。从比较研究中可以看出,在整体意义上,金属锥球插入锥形角优于透镜校正角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance comparison of metallic cone-sphere-inserted and dielectric lens-corrected conical horns
This paper compares the performance of metallic cone-sphere-inserted and plano-convex dielectric lens-corrected conical horns. The parameters considered in the study are gain, aperture efficiency, peak cross-polarization, radiation patterns and return loss. It emerges from the comparative study that, in an overall sense, the metallic cone-sphere-inserted conical horn outperforms the lens-corrected horn.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信