P. Darmstadt, Mihir Mistry, Andrew Arkebauer, Allan Beiderman, Ephraim Chen, C. Dillard, Sheevangi Pathak
{"title":"满足EASA SC-VTOL-01 10-9灾难性失效标准的分布式电力推进和飞行控制概念","authors":"P. Darmstadt, Mihir Mistry, Andrew Arkebauer, Allan Beiderman, Ephraim Chen, C. Dillard, Sheevangi Pathak","doi":"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The objective of the current work was to develop an all-electric distributed propulsion and flight control (DPFC) architecture that will have no more than 10-9 catastrophic failures per flight hour (pfh). The DPFC architecture was broken into four system design teams, the (i) electrical power and distribution system, (ii) drive and power system, (iii) thermal management system (TMS), and (iv) flight control system (FCS). System designs were updated and iterated upon, working with reliability and safety analysis teams, to develop compliant designs. The firm designs were reflected in a preliminary system safety assessment (PSSA) for initial verification of compliance. Additionally, design and analysis excursions are presented in which aircraft attributes were modified to investigate sensitivities to propulsion type, number of rotors, and control schemes. Excursion results found that all aircraft evaluated likely have paths to comply with the stringent, probabilistic catastrophic failure criteria. However, S&C models showed large power transients that must be addressed and PSSA results show that future work is needed in single load path structures, high voltage power storage and distribution, and in motor/rotor overspeed protection.\n","PeriodicalId":273020,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed Electric Propulsion and Flight Control Concept to Meet EASA SC-VTOL-01 10-9 Catastrophic Failure Criteria\",\"authors\":\"P. Darmstadt, Mihir Mistry, Andrew Arkebauer, Allan Beiderman, Ephraim Chen, C. Dillard, Sheevangi Pathak\",\"doi\":\"10.4050/f-0077-2021-16891\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The objective of the current work was to develop an all-electric distributed propulsion and flight control (DPFC) architecture that will have no more than 10-9 catastrophic failures per flight hour (pfh). The DPFC architecture was broken into four system design teams, the (i) electrical power and distribution system, (ii) drive and power system, (iii) thermal management system (TMS), and (iv) flight control system (FCS). System designs were updated and iterated upon, working with reliability and safety analysis teams, to develop compliant designs. The firm designs were reflected in a preliminary system safety assessment (PSSA) for initial verification of compliance. Additionally, design and analysis excursions are presented in which aircraft attributes were modified to investigate sensitivities to propulsion type, number of rotors, and control schemes. Excursion results found that all aircraft evaluated likely have paths to comply with the stringent, probabilistic catastrophic failure criteria. However, S&C models showed large power transients that must be addressed and PSSA results show that future work is needed in single load path structures, high voltage power storage and distribution, and in motor/rotor overspeed protection.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":273020,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16891\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Vertical Flight Society 77th Annual Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4050/f-0077-2021-16891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Distributed Electric Propulsion and Flight Control Concept to Meet EASA SC-VTOL-01 10-9 Catastrophic Failure Criteria
The objective of the current work was to develop an all-electric distributed propulsion and flight control (DPFC) architecture that will have no more than 10-9 catastrophic failures per flight hour (pfh). The DPFC architecture was broken into four system design teams, the (i) electrical power and distribution system, (ii) drive and power system, (iii) thermal management system (TMS), and (iv) flight control system (FCS). System designs were updated and iterated upon, working with reliability and safety analysis teams, to develop compliant designs. The firm designs were reflected in a preliminary system safety assessment (PSSA) for initial verification of compliance. Additionally, design and analysis excursions are presented in which aircraft attributes were modified to investigate sensitivities to propulsion type, number of rotors, and control schemes. Excursion results found that all aircraft evaluated likely have paths to comply with the stringent, probabilistic catastrophic failure criteria. However, S&C models showed large power transients that must be addressed and PSSA results show that future work is needed in single load path structures, high voltage power storage and distribution, and in motor/rotor overspeed protection.