{"title":"成为原告","authors":"E. Swift","doi":"10.15779/Z381W1N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rn speaking at the National Conference on Women and the Law, my goal was to describe what it takes to survive the obstacles women face in changing from \"tenure victim\" into \"discrimination plaintiff.\" I wanted to share my perspective on two unenviable experiences-my original losing battle for tenure as a woman law professor and my subsequent pursuit of a sex discrimination grievance as a woman plaintiff-with that particular audience of women law professors and women law students. Making the change from victim to plaintiff involves both groups. The process requires a network of mutually reinforcing collegial relationships and there is also much that law students have done and can do to help. Several discrimination lawyers told me after the Conference that my description of becoming a plaintiff was useful from their perspective also. Every lawyer understands one obvious premise of our system of justice: every lawsuit needs a plaintiff. But not every lawyer, and certainly not every prospective client, understands what it takes to become a plaintiff. What I learned about that process may be useful in both the practice and teaching of law. My experiences began two years ago when I was denied tenure at the School of Law-Boalt Hall-at the University of California at Berkeley. In February of 1988, I filed a grievance alleging that my tenure denial was a product of sex-based discrimination, in that the Boalt Hall faculty had applied different and more onerous standards to my tenure case than it had applied to the men granted tenure at Boalt Hall during the 1980s. After a preliminary investigation, the campus-wide grievance committee at Berkeley soon issued a prima facie finding in my favor on my charge. This finding, the first of its kind in a gender case at U.C. Berkeley, meant that the committee found \"sufficient reason\" to conduct a full hearing on my grievance. Thus in two years my \"tenure denial\" evolved into \"my grievance,\" and then into \"my finding,\" and then into \"my case.\" I retained two discrimination specialists as my lawyers to prepare for the grievance","PeriodicalId":408518,"journal":{"name":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Becoming a Plaintiff\",\"authors\":\"E. Swift\",\"doi\":\"10.15779/Z381W1N\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rn speaking at the National Conference on Women and the Law, my goal was to describe what it takes to survive the obstacles women face in changing from \\\"tenure victim\\\" into \\\"discrimination plaintiff.\\\" I wanted to share my perspective on two unenviable experiences-my original losing battle for tenure as a woman law professor and my subsequent pursuit of a sex discrimination grievance as a woman plaintiff-with that particular audience of women law professors and women law students. Making the change from victim to plaintiff involves both groups. The process requires a network of mutually reinforcing collegial relationships and there is also much that law students have done and can do to help. Several discrimination lawyers told me after the Conference that my description of becoming a plaintiff was useful from their perspective also. Every lawyer understands one obvious premise of our system of justice: every lawsuit needs a plaintiff. But not every lawyer, and certainly not every prospective client, understands what it takes to become a plaintiff. What I learned about that process may be useful in both the practice and teaching of law. My experiences began two years ago when I was denied tenure at the School of Law-Boalt Hall-at the University of California at Berkeley. In February of 1988, I filed a grievance alleging that my tenure denial was a product of sex-based discrimination, in that the Boalt Hall faculty had applied different and more onerous standards to my tenure case than it had applied to the men granted tenure at Boalt Hall during the 1980s. After a preliminary investigation, the campus-wide grievance committee at Berkeley soon issued a prima facie finding in my favor on my charge. This finding, the first of its kind in a gender case at U.C. Berkeley, meant that the committee found \\\"sufficient reason\\\" to conduct a full hearing on my grievance. Thus in two years my \\\"tenure denial\\\" evolved into \\\"my grievance,\\\" and then into \\\"my finding,\\\" and then into \\\"my case.\\\" I retained two discrimination specialists as my lawyers to prepare for the grievance\",\"PeriodicalId\":408518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z381W1N\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Berkeley La Raza Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15779/Z381W1N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在全国妇女与法律会议上,我的目标是描述如何克服女性从“终身任职受害者”转变为“歧视原告”所面临的障碍。我想和女法学教授和女法学学生这群特别的听众分享我对两个不令人羡慕的经历的看法——我最初作为一名女法学教授在争取终身教职的斗争中失败,以及后来作为一名女性原告对性别歧视的申诉。从受害者到原告的转变涉及两个群体。这个过程需要一个相互加强的学院关系网络,法学院学生已经做了很多事情,也可以做很多事情来提供帮助。会议结束后,几位反歧视律师告诉我,从他们的角度来看,我对成为原告的描述也很有用。每个律师都明白我们司法制度的一个显而易见的前提:每一起诉讼都需要一个原告。但并不是每一位律师,当然也不是每一位潜在客户,都明白成为原告需要付出什么代价。我在这个过程中学到的东西可能对法律的实践和教学都有用。我的经历始于两年前,当时我被加州大学伯克利分校(University of California at Berkeley)的法学院(boalt hall)拒绝终身聘用。1988年2月,我提出申诉,声称我的终身教职被拒是性别歧视的产物,因为鲍尔特学院的教职人员对我的终身教职申请采用了不同的、更苛刻的标准,而不是对20世纪80年代鲍尔特学院授予终身教职的男性的标准。经过初步调查,伯克利的校园申诉委员会很快发表了对我的指控有利的初步调查结果。这是加州大学伯克利分校首例性别案件的裁决,意味着委员会找到了“充分的理由”对我的申诉进行全面听证。就这样,在两年的时间里,我的“拒绝终身教职”演变成了“我的不满”,然后变成了“我的发现”,最后变成了“我的案子”。我聘请了两名歧视专家作为我的律师,为申诉做准备
Rn speaking at the National Conference on Women and the Law, my goal was to describe what it takes to survive the obstacles women face in changing from "tenure victim" into "discrimination plaintiff." I wanted to share my perspective on two unenviable experiences-my original losing battle for tenure as a woman law professor and my subsequent pursuit of a sex discrimination grievance as a woman plaintiff-with that particular audience of women law professors and women law students. Making the change from victim to plaintiff involves both groups. The process requires a network of mutually reinforcing collegial relationships and there is also much that law students have done and can do to help. Several discrimination lawyers told me after the Conference that my description of becoming a plaintiff was useful from their perspective also. Every lawyer understands one obvious premise of our system of justice: every lawsuit needs a plaintiff. But not every lawyer, and certainly not every prospective client, understands what it takes to become a plaintiff. What I learned about that process may be useful in both the practice and teaching of law. My experiences began two years ago when I was denied tenure at the School of Law-Boalt Hall-at the University of California at Berkeley. In February of 1988, I filed a grievance alleging that my tenure denial was a product of sex-based discrimination, in that the Boalt Hall faculty had applied different and more onerous standards to my tenure case than it had applied to the men granted tenure at Boalt Hall during the 1980s. After a preliminary investigation, the campus-wide grievance committee at Berkeley soon issued a prima facie finding in my favor on my charge. This finding, the first of its kind in a gender case at U.C. Berkeley, meant that the committee found "sufficient reason" to conduct a full hearing on my grievance. Thus in two years my "tenure denial" evolved into "my grievance," and then into "my finding," and then into "my case." I retained two discrimination specialists as my lawyers to prepare for the grievance