皮萨列夫批判的理论前提

V. F. Pereverzev
{"title":"皮萨列夫批判的理论前提","authors":"V. F. Pereverzev","doi":"10.2753/RSL1061-197522020336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A proper understanding of Pisarev's critical position depends on a proper understanding of his view of aesthetics. His critical method is defined by his aesthetic outlook. Anyone who does not understand the logic of his aesthetic outlook will have nothing sensible to say about Pisarev as a critic. Pisarev's critical method is usually known as a \"publicistic\" method, by which is meant that the literary fact is transformed in his works from an object of investigation into an excuse for social propaganda. This is true only to a certain extent, and in any case does not grasp what is most essential for Pisarev's critical methodology. Considering Pisarev's inclination toward publicistics as the central element in his criticism distorts the true meaning and actual methodological position of his work.","PeriodicalId":173745,"journal":{"name":"Soviet Studies in Literature","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical Premises of Pisarev's Criticism\",\"authors\":\"V. F. Pereverzev\",\"doi\":\"10.2753/RSL1061-197522020336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A proper understanding of Pisarev's critical position depends on a proper understanding of his view of aesthetics. His critical method is defined by his aesthetic outlook. Anyone who does not understand the logic of his aesthetic outlook will have nothing sensible to say about Pisarev as a critic. Pisarev's critical method is usually known as a \\\"publicistic\\\" method, by which is meant that the literary fact is transformed in his works from an object of investigation into an excuse for social propaganda. This is true only to a certain extent, and in any case does not grasp what is most essential for Pisarev's critical methodology. Considering Pisarev's inclination toward publicistics as the central element in his criticism distorts the true meaning and actual methodological position of his work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":173745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soviet Studies in Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197522020336\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet Studies in Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-197522020336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

正确理解皮萨列夫的批判立场,取决于正确理解他的美学观。他的审美观决定了他的批评方法。任何不理解他的美学观点的逻辑的人,都不会对作为批评家的皮萨列夫有任何明智的评论。皮萨列夫的批评方法通常被称为“公共主义”方法,即文学事实在他的作品中从一个调查对象转变为一个社会宣传的借口。这只是在一定程度上是正确的,而且无论如何都没有抓住皮萨列夫批判方法论最重要的东西。把皮萨列夫对宣传学的倾向作为其批评的中心因素,扭曲了他的作品的真正意义和实际的方法论立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Theoretical Premises of Pisarev's Criticism
A proper understanding of Pisarev's critical position depends on a proper understanding of his view of aesthetics. His critical method is defined by his aesthetic outlook. Anyone who does not understand the logic of his aesthetic outlook will have nothing sensible to say about Pisarev as a critic. Pisarev's critical method is usually known as a "publicistic" method, by which is meant that the literary fact is transformed in his works from an object of investigation into an excuse for social propaganda. This is true only to a certain extent, and in any case does not grasp what is most essential for Pisarev's critical methodology. Considering Pisarev's inclination toward publicistics as the central element in his criticism distorts the true meaning and actual methodological position of his work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信