大跨度桥梁的气动结构优化设计:从线性到非线性气动弹性驱动的视角

M. Cid Montoya, A. Kareem, S. Hernández
{"title":"大跨度桥梁的气动结构优化设计:从线性到非线性气动弹性驱动的视角","authors":"M. Cid Montoya, A. Kareem, S. Hernández","doi":"10.2749/istanbul.2023.0167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structural optimization techniques have been demonstrated to be a powerful tool for the cost-effective design of bridges under aeroelastic considerations, particularly when applied to super-long span suspension or cable-stayed bridges. The efficacy of this methodology relies on the comprehensive and accurate formulation of the wind-resistant design problem. The analysis of the wind-induced responses, such as flutter and buffeting, has been typically addressed in the industry by adopting multi-mode analysis techniques using linear force modeling approaches based on the fundamental contributions of Prof. Davenport and Prof. Scanlan. In the same way, the aero-structural optimization frameworks previously developed by the authors have followed this approach by mimicking the design goals and specifications of real bridge projects in the formulation of the optimization problem. However, wind tunnel tests and on-site monitoring measurements have shown that under some circumstances, the so-called linear aeroelasticity models fail in predicting the bridge responses. Hence, several nonlinear aeroelastic methods have been developed in the last decades, including the corrected quasi-steady theory (QST) model, band superposition model, hybrid nonlinear model, rheological model, artificial neural networks (ANN) based model, and Volterra models, among others. These methods should be advanced in order to define deck shape-dependent accurate models that permit their implementation into design optimization frameworks to achieve cost-effective and safe bridge design. This study reviews the effectiveness of these methods and discusses practical directions to follow to adequately implement nonlinear aeroelasticity features into the holistic aero-structural optimization of long-span bridges.","PeriodicalId":237396,"journal":{"name":"IABSE Symposium, Istanbul 2023: Long Span Bridges","volume":"192 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aero-structural design optimization of long-span bridges: From linear to nonlinear aeroelasticity-driven perspectives\",\"authors\":\"M. Cid Montoya, A. Kareem, S. Hernández\",\"doi\":\"10.2749/istanbul.2023.0167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Structural optimization techniques have been demonstrated to be a powerful tool for the cost-effective design of bridges under aeroelastic considerations, particularly when applied to super-long span suspension or cable-stayed bridges. The efficacy of this methodology relies on the comprehensive and accurate formulation of the wind-resistant design problem. The analysis of the wind-induced responses, such as flutter and buffeting, has been typically addressed in the industry by adopting multi-mode analysis techniques using linear force modeling approaches based on the fundamental contributions of Prof. Davenport and Prof. Scanlan. In the same way, the aero-structural optimization frameworks previously developed by the authors have followed this approach by mimicking the design goals and specifications of real bridge projects in the formulation of the optimization problem. However, wind tunnel tests and on-site monitoring measurements have shown that under some circumstances, the so-called linear aeroelasticity models fail in predicting the bridge responses. Hence, several nonlinear aeroelastic methods have been developed in the last decades, including the corrected quasi-steady theory (QST) model, band superposition model, hybrid nonlinear model, rheological model, artificial neural networks (ANN) based model, and Volterra models, among others. These methods should be advanced in order to define deck shape-dependent accurate models that permit their implementation into design optimization frameworks to achieve cost-effective and safe bridge design. This study reviews the effectiveness of these methods and discusses practical directions to follow to adequately implement nonlinear aeroelasticity features into the holistic aero-structural optimization of long-span bridges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":237396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IABSE Symposium, Istanbul 2023: Long Span Bridges\",\"volume\":\"192 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IABSE Symposium, Istanbul 2023: Long Span Bridges\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2749/istanbul.2023.0167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IABSE Symposium, Istanbul 2023: Long Span Bridges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2749/istanbul.2023.0167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

结构优化技术已被证明是考虑气动弹性的桥梁经济有效设计的有力工具,特别是当应用于超长跨度悬索桥或斜拉桥时。这种方法的有效性依赖于对抗风设计问题的全面和准确的表述。基于Davenport教授和Scanlan教授的基本贡献,采用线性力建模方法的多模态分析技术,对颤振和抖振等风致响应进行了典型的分析。同样,作者之前开发的空气结构优化框架也遵循了这种方法,在优化问题的制定中模仿了真实桥梁项目的设计目标和规范。然而,风洞试验和现场监测测量表明,在某些情况下,所谓的线性气动弹性模型无法预测桥梁的响应。因此,在过去的几十年里,已经发展了几种非线性气动弹性方法,包括校正准稳态理论(QST)模型、带叠加模型、混合非线性模型、流变模型、基于人工神经网络(ANN)的模型和Volterra模型等。这些方法应该得到改进,以便定义与桥面形状相关的精确模型,使其能够实施到设计优化框架中,以实现成本效益和安全的桥梁设计。本文综述了这些方法的有效性,并讨论了在大跨度桥梁整体气动结构优化中充分考虑非线性气动弹性特性的可行方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aero-structural design optimization of long-span bridges: From linear to nonlinear aeroelasticity-driven perspectives
Structural optimization techniques have been demonstrated to be a powerful tool for the cost-effective design of bridges under aeroelastic considerations, particularly when applied to super-long span suspension or cable-stayed bridges. The efficacy of this methodology relies on the comprehensive and accurate formulation of the wind-resistant design problem. The analysis of the wind-induced responses, such as flutter and buffeting, has been typically addressed in the industry by adopting multi-mode analysis techniques using linear force modeling approaches based on the fundamental contributions of Prof. Davenport and Prof. Scanlan. In the same way, the aero-structural optimization frameworks previously developed by the authors have followed this approach by mimicking the design goals and specifications of real bridge projects in the formulation of the optimization problem. However, wind tunnel tests and on-site monitoring measurements have shown that under some circumstances, the so-called linear aeroelasticity models fail in predicting the bridge responses. Hence, several nonlinear aeroelastic methods have been developed in the last decades, including the corrected quasi-steady theory (QST) model, band superposition model, hybrid nonlinear model, rheological model, artificial neural networks (ANN) based model, and Volterra models, among others. These methods should be advanced in order to define deck shape-dependent accurate models that permit their implementation into design optimization frameworks to achieve cost-effective and safe bridge design. This study reviews the effectiveness of these methods and discusses practical directions to follow to adequately implement nonlinear aeroelasticity features into the holistic aero-structural optimization of long-span bridges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信