用心理测量学方法监测训练强度和恢复:与年轻运动员的性别比较

R. Cruz, Danilo L. Alves, R. Azevedo, R. Bertuzzi, F. De-Oliveira, J. Lima
{"title":"用心理测量学方法监测训练强度和恢复:与年轻运动员的性别比较","authors":"R. Cruz, Danilo L. Alves, R. Azevedo, R. Bertuzzi, F. De-Oliveira, J. Lima","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201700030024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim — The purpose of present study was verify if the RPE-training session differs between females and males during the track and field training and if biological maturity (BM) has interference on this response. Methods: Seventyfive athletes (13-15 years old) have participated of study, with 38 male 37 female. Five training sessions of track and field were prescribe and monitoring by RPE-training session (intensity) and Total Quality Recovery (TQR) (recovery). Results: There was no statistical difference between males and females on 75-meters run, long jump and shot put. Otherwise, for training of 250 and 1000-meters females related higher RPE-values than males 3.68 ± 0.79, 3.26 ± 0.56, p < 0.01 and 4.14 ± 0.94, 3.72 ± 0.89, p < 0.05; respectively. Even when controlling the effect of biological maturity the same results were observed to 250-meters F1,73 = 2.060; p = 0.002 and 1000-meters F1,73 = 0.997; p = 0.036. There was no difference for TQR between genders. Conclusion: The comparison the RPE-training session of females and males indicated there were difference to 250 and 1000-m training sessions, females have more RPE-training sessions than males. Additionally, there were no differences between genders for recovery parameters, even controlling BM.","PeriodicalId":267352,"journal":{"name":"Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring the training intensity and recovery with a psychometrics approach: a gender comparison with young athletes\",\"authors\":\"R. Cruz, Danilo L. Alves, R. Azevedo, R. Bertuzzi, F. De-Oliveira, J. Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1980-6574201700030024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim — The purpose of present study was verify if the RPE-training session differs between females and males during the track and field training and if biological maturity (BM) has interference on this response. Methods: Seventyfive athletes (13-15 years old) have participated of study, with 38 male 37 female. Five training sessions of track and field were prescribe and monitoring by RPE-training session (intensity) and Total Quality Recovery (TQR) (recovery). Results: There was no statistical difference between males and females on 75-meters run, long jump and shot put. Otherwise, for training of 250 and 1000-meters females related higher RPE-values than males 3.68 ± 0.79, 3.26 ± 0.56, p < 0.01 and 4.14 ± 0.94, 3.72 ± 0.89, p < 0.05; respectively. Even when controlling the effect of biological maturity the same results were observed to 250-meters F1,73 = 2.060; p = 0.002 and 1000-meters F1,73 = 0.997; p = 0.036. There was no difference for TQR between genders. Conclusion: The comparison the RPE-training session of females and males indicated there were difference to 250 and 1000-m training sessions, females have more RPE-training sessions than males. Additionally, there were no differences between genders for recovery parameters, even controlling BM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":267352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201700030024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz-revista De Educacao Fisica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201700030024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是验证在田径训练中,女性和男性的rpe训练阶段是否不同,以及生物成熟度(BM)是否对这种反应有干扰。方法:75名运动员(13 ~ 15岁)参与研究,男38名,女37名。采用rpe(训练次数)(强度)和TQR(恢复)(总质量恢复)进行监测。结果:男女在75米跑、跳远、铅球三项成绩上差异无统计学意义。250米、1000米训练中,女性rpe值分别高于男性3.68±0.79、3.26±0.56 (p < 0.01)和4.14±0.94、3.72±0.89 (p < 0.05);分别。即使在控制生物成熟度的影响下,对250米的F1也有相同的结果,73 = 2.060;p = 0.002, 1000米F1,73 = 0.997;P = 0.036。TQR在性别间无差异。结论:女性和男性的rpe训练次数比较表明,在250米和1000米训练次数上存在差异,女性的rpe训练次数多于男性。此外,即使在控制BM的情况下,恢复参数也没有性别差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Monitoring the training intensity and recovery with a psychometrics approach: a gender comparison with young athletes
Aim — The purpose of present study was verify if the RPE-training session differs between females and males during the track and field training and if biological maturity (BM) has interference on this response. Methods: Seventyfive athletes (13-15 years old) have participated of study, with 38 male 37 female. Five training sessions of track and field were prescribe and monitoring by RPE-training session (intensity) and Total Quality Recovery (TQR) (recovery). Results: There was no statistical difference between males and females on 75-meters run, long jump and shot put. Otherwise, for training of 250 and 1000-meters females related higher RPE-values than males 3.68 ± 0.79, 3.26 ± 0.56, p < 0.01 and 4.14 ± 0.94, 3.72 ± 0.89, p < 0.05; respectively. Even when controlling the effect of biological maturity the same results were observed to 250-meters F1,73 = 2.060; p = 0.002 and 1000-meters F1,73 = 0.997; p = 0.036. There was no difference for TQR between genders. Conclusion: The comparison the RPE-training session of females and males indicated there were difference to 250 and 1000-m training sessions, females have more RPE-training sessions than males. Additionally, there were no differences between genders for recovery parameters, even controlling BM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信