为医生信任而设计:迈向辐射毒性风险的机器学习决策辅助

Paige Gilbank, Kaleigh Johnson-Cover, T. Truong
{"title":"为医生信任而设计:迈向辐射毒性风险的机器学习决策辅助","authors":"Paige Gilbank, Kaleigh Johnson-Cover, T. Truong","doi":"10.1177/1064804619896172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The application of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care is expected to improve care delivery and patient outcomes. However, there are no best practices for designing these technologies for use in clinical settings. To explore user needs and design requirements for a user interface of a ML risk prediction tool in development, we consulted with subject matter experts and physicians. We explored physician expectations of using a ML tool in clinical practice and their preferences on designs. Our process revealed physician perspectives on trusting a ML tool and opportunities to design for these considerations, while navigating ambiguity in the tool’s outputs.","PeriodicalId":357563,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing for Physician Trust: Toward a Machine Learning Decision Aid for Radiation Toxicity Risk\",\"authors\":\"Paige Gilbank, Kaleigh Johnson-Cover, T. Truong\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1064804619896172\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The application of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care is expected to improve care delivery and patient outcomes. However, there are no best practices for designing these technologies for use in clinical settings. To explore user needs and design requirements for a user interface of a ML risk prediction tool in development, we consulted with subject matter experts and physicians. We explored physician expectations of using a ML tool in clinical practice and their preferences on designs. Our process revealed physician perspectives on trusting a ML tool and opportunities to design for these considerations, while navigating ambiguity in the tool’s outputs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804619896172\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804619896172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

机器学习(ML)技术在医疗保健领域的应用有望改善医疗服务和患者的治疗效果。然而,目前还没有设计这些技术用于临床的最佳实践。为了探索开发中的机器学习风险预测工具的用户界面的用户需求和设计要求,我们咨询了主题专家和医生。我们探讨了医生在临床实践中使用ML工具的期望以及他们对设计的偏好。我们的过程揭示了医生对信任ML工具的看法,以及为这些考虑因素进行设计的机会,同时导航工具输出中的模糊性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing for Physician Trust: Toward a Machine Learning Decision Aid for Radiation Toxicity Risk
The application of machine learning (ML) technologies in health care is expected to improve care delivery and patient outcomes. However, there are no best practices for designing these technologies for use in clinical settings. To explore user needs and design requirements for a user interface of a ML risk prediction tool in development, we consulted with subject matter experts and physicians. We explored physician expectations of using a ML tool in clinical practice and their preferences on designs. Our process revealed physician perspectives on trusting a ML tool and opportunities to design for these considerations, while navigating ambiguity in the tool’s outputs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信