{"title":"对2016年11月10日jelenia地区法院gÓra裁决的注解,文件编号:维嘉431/16(批准)","authors":"Łukasz Buczek","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of the study is a commentary to the judgement of the appeal court, in which the court expressly denied the possibility of performing the examination of a premises as part of investigative operations, even if such activity was performed with the voluntary provision of premises by a person authorised to dispose of it.\n\n","PeriodicalId":278850,"journal":{"name":"PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"GLOSS TO THE RULING OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN JELENIA GÓRA DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2016, FILE REF. NO. VI KA 431/16 (APPROVING)\",\"authors\":\"Łukasz Buczek\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0015.0409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subject of the study is a commentary to the judgement of the appeal court, in which the court expressly denied the possibility of performing the examination of a premises as part of investigative operations, even if such activity was performed with the voluntary provision of premises by a person authorised to dispose of it.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":278850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0409\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRZEGLĄD POLICYJNY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.0409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
GLOSS TO THE RULING OF THE DISTRICT COURT IN JELENIA GÓRA DATED NOVEMBER 10, 2016, FILE REF. NO. VI KA 431/16 (APPROVING)
The subject of the study is a commentary to the judgement of the appeal court, in which the court expressly denied the possibility of performing the examination of a premises as part of investigative operations, even if such activity was performed with the voluntary provision of premises by a person authorised to dispose of it.